The impact of the 1997 Office of Management and Budget standards for collecting multiracial data on the assessment of race-specific cancer rates of incidence and mortality in the United States

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35930
Mandi Yu PhD, Natalie Joe PhD, Recinda L. Sherman PhD, Christopher J. Johnson MA, Serban Negoita MD, DrPH, Steve Scoppa BA, James (Todd) Gibson BA, Kathleen A. Cronin PhD, MPH
{"title":"The impact of the 1997 Office of Management and Budget standards for collecting multiracial data on the assessment of race-specific cancer rates of incidence and mortality in the United States","authors":"Mandi Yu PhD,&nbsp;Natalie Joe PhD,&nbsp;Recinda L. Sherman PhD,&nbsp;Christopher J. Johnson MA,&nbsp;Serban Negoita MD, DrPH,&nbsp;Steve Scoppa BA,&nbsp;James (Todd) Gibson BA,&nbsp;Kathleen A. Cronin PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The differential implementation of the 1997 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) standards of collecting multiracial data affects the accuracy and comparability of race-specific cancer rates of incidence and mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Cancer incidences from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and cancer deaths from the National Vital Statistics System were obtained. Population data came from Census Bureau postcensal vintage 2022 estimates. Age-standardized rates of incidence and mortality in 2020 were compared via rate ratios across three race definitions: two definitions compliant with the 1997 OMB standards, namely race-alone and race-alone-or-in-combination, and one compliant with the previous 1977 OMB standards, namely bridged-race.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The proportions of multiracial individuals in the incidence and death data were lower than those in the population data, with the degree varying by age, race, and geography. However, race definitions had minimal impact on rates for Whites, Blacks, and Asians. Race-alone-or-in-combination rates were lower for Native Hawaiians or other Pacific Islanders (NHOPIs) compared to race-alone rates, which suggests an underrepresentation of multiracial NHOPI individuals in the incidence data. Race-alone and race-alone-or-in-combination yielded similar rates for American Indians/Alaskan Natives (AI/ANs) but were significantly lower than their bridged-race counterparts, which suggests a mismatch in how AI/AN was classified between the incidence and population data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Improving the representation of multiracial incidence is essential for addressing the unique needs in cancer prevention and care among subpopulations with large shares of multiracial individuals. This article is the first to demonstrate the usefulness of race-alone-or-in-combination categories in capturing cancer burdens for minority race groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35930","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35930","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The differential implementation of the 1997 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) standards of collecting multiracial data affects the accuracy and comparability of race-specific cancer rates of incidence and mortality.

Methods

Cancer incidences from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and cancer deaths from the National Vital Statistics System were obtained. Population data came from Census Bureau postcensal vintage 2022 estimates. Age-standardized rates of incidence and mortality in 2020 were compared via rate ratios across three race definitions: two definitions compliant with the 1997 OMB standards, namely race-alone and race-alone-or-in-combination, and one compliant with the previous 1977 OMB standards, namely bridged-race.

Results

The proportions of multiracial individuals in the incidence and death data were lower than those in the population data, with the degree varying by age, race, and geography. However, race definitions had minimal impact on rates for Whites, Blacks, and Asians. Race-alone-or-in-combination rates were lower for Native Hawaiians or other Pacific Islanders (NHOPIs) compared to race-alone rates, which suggests an underrepresentation of multiracial NHOPI individuals in the incidence data. Race-alone and race-alone-or-in-combination yielded similar rates for American Indians/Alaskan Natives (AI/ANs) but were significantly lower than their bridged-race counterparts, which suggests a mismatch in how AI/AN was classified between the incidence and population data.

Conclusions

Improving the representation of multiracial incidence is essential for addressing the unique needs in cancer prevention and care among subpopulations with large shares of multiracial individuals. This article is the first to demonstrate the usefulness of race-alone-or-in-combination categories in capturing cancer burdens for minority race groups.

Abstract Image

1997年管理和预算办公室标准对收集美国特定种族癌症发病率和死亡率评估的多种族数据的影响
背景1997年管理和预算办公室(OMB)收集多种族数据标准的差异执行影响了种族特异性癌症发病率和死亡率的准确性和可比性。方法获取美国国家癌症研究所监测、流行病学和最终结果项目中的癌症发病率和美国国家生命统计系统中的癌症死亡人数。人口数据来自人口普查局2022年人口普查后的估计。2020年年龄标准化的发病率和死亡率通过三种种族定义的比率进行比较:两种定义符合1997年OMB标准,即单独种族和单独种族或结合种族,另一种定义符合1977年OMB之前的标准,即桥接种族。结果多种族个体在发病率和死亡数据中的比例低于人口数据,且程度随年龄、种族和地理位置的不同而不同。然而,种族定义对白人、黑人和亚洲人的发病率影响很小。与单一种族相比,夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民(NHOPI)的单一种族或混合种族的发病率较低,这表明在发病率数据中,多种族NHOPI个体的代表性不足。在美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/ANs)中,单独的种族和单独的种族或结合的种族产生了相似的发病率,但明显低于他们的桥种族对应,这表明AI/AN在发病率和人口数据之间的分类方式不匹配。结论:提高多种族发病率的代表性对于解决多种族人群在癌症预防和治疗方面的独特需求至关重要。这篇文章首次证明了单独种族或组合种族分类在捕捉少数种族群体癌症负担方面的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信