The Day Two Advantage: A Retrospective Paired Analysis of Consecutive HPC(A) Collections

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q4 HEMATOLOGY
Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman, Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez, Shinnette Lumame, Charisma Castelo, Jay Mary Rose-Roque, Marlene Cato, Nameer Al-Saadawi, Mohamed Ibrahim Abu-Haleeqa, Inas El-Najjar, Yendry Ventura-Carmenate, Fatema Mohammed Al-Kaabi
{"title":"The Day Two Advantage: A Retrospective Paired Analysis of Consecutive HPC(A) Collections","authors":"Yandy Marx Castillo-Aleman,&nbsp;Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde,&nbsp;Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez,&nbsp;Shinnette Lumame,&nbsp;Charisma Castelo,&nbsp;Jay Mary Rose-Roque,&nbsp;Marlene Cato,&nbsp;Nameer Al-Saadawi,&nbsp;Mohamed Ibrahim Abu-Haleeqa,&nbsp;Inas El-Najjar,&nbsp;Yendry Ventura-Carmenate,&nbsp;Fatema Mohammed Al-Kaabi","doi":"10.1002/jca.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The hematopoietic progenitor cell apheresis [HPC(A)] is a cornerstone of stem cell transplantation. While multiple apheresis sessions are common in clinical practice, few studies have examined the procedural variability within the same donor across consecutive collections. This study aims to compare changes in the efficiency metrics between the first and second HPC(A) procedures. A retrospective analysis was conducted on paired HPC(A) procedures performed on the same donor between January 2023 and May 2025 at the Abu Dhabi Stem Cells Center. The predefined parameters, including the collection efficiencies (CE<sub>1</sub>, CE<sub>2</sub>, cruCE), performance ratio (PR), and total volume processed (TVP), were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's <i>r</i>, and associations between variables were assessed using the Spearman correlation. Of the 215 procedures screened, 90 met the inclusion criteria. Despite similar preapheresis CD34<sup>+</sup> cell counts and flow rates, second-day procedures demonstrated significantly improved CE<sub>1</sub>, CE<sub>2</sub>, and PR, with lower TVP. A large effect size was observed for the TVP/total blood volume (TBV) ratio (<i>r</i> = 0.63), and moderate-to-large effect sizes for CE<sub>2</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.41), PR (<i>r</i> = 0.47), and CE<sub>1</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.47). CE<sub>1</sub> and CE<sub>2</sub> correlated strongly with PR across both sessions, while CE<sub>2</sub> correlated positively with TVP/TBV on day 1 (<i>ρ</i> = 0.47) and negatively on day 2 (<i>ρ</i> = −0.40). Second-day HPC(A) sessions yielded superior efficiency despite reduced volume, supporting the value of individualized collection planning. These “<i>day two advantages</i>” may inform refinements in yield prediction and highlight the need for prospective studies to optimize apheresis strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jca.70046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The hematopoietic progenitor cell apheresis [HPC(A)] is a cornerstone of stem cell transplantation. While multiple apheresis sessions are common in clinical practice, few studies have examined the procedural variability within the same donor across consecutive collections. This study aims to compare changes in the efficiency metrics between the first and second HPC(A) procedures. A retrospective analysis was conducted on paired HPC(A) procedures performed on the same donor between January 2023 and May 2025 at the Abu Dhabi Stem Cells Center. The predefined parameters, including the collection efficiencies (CE1, CE2, cruCE), performance ratio (PR), and total volume processed (TVP), were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen's r, and associations between variables were assessed using the Spearman correlation. Of the 215 procedures screened, 90 met the inclusion criteria. Despite similar preapheresis CD34+ cell counts and flow rates, second-day procedures demonstrated significantly improved CE1, CE2, and PR, with lower TVP. A large effect size was observed for the TVP/total blood volume (TBV) ratio (r = 0.63), and moderate-to-large effect sizes for CE2 (r = 0.41), PR (r = 0.47), and CE1 (r = 0.47). CE1 and CE2 correlated strongly with PR across both sessions, while CE2 correlated positively with TVP/TBV on day 1 (ρ = 0.47) and negatively on day 2 (ρ = −0.40). Second-day HPC(A) sessions yielded superior efficiency despite reduced volume, supporting the value of individualized collection planning. These “day two advantages” may inform refinements in yield prediction and highlight the need for prospective studies to optimize apheresis strategies.

第2天的优势:连续HPC(A)收集的回顾性配对分析
造血祖细胞分离[HPC(A)]是干细胞移植的基石。虽然多次采血在临床实践中很常见,但很少有研究检查同一供者在连续采集中的程序可变性。本研究旨在比较第一次和第二次HPC(A)程序之间效率指标的变化。回顾性分析了2023年1月至2025年5月在阿布扎比干细胞中心对同一供体进行的配对HPC(A)手术。预定义的参数,包括收集效率(CE1、CE2、cruCE)、性能比(PR)和处理总量(TVP),使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较。效应量使用Cohen’s r计算,变量之间的关联使用Spearman相关评估。在筛选的215项手术中,有90项符合纳入标准。尽管采前CD34+细胞计数和流速相似,但第2天的手术显示CE1、CE2和PR显著改善,TVP降低。TVP/总血容量(TBV)比值有较大的效应量(r = 0.63), CE2 (r = 0.41)、PR (r = 0.47)和CE1 (r = 0.47)有中等到较大的效应量。CE1和CE2在两个会话中与PR呈强相关,而CE2在第1天与TVP/TBV呈正相关(ρ = 0.47),在第2天呈负相关(ρ = - 0.40)。第二天的HPC(A)会议产生了卓越的效率,尽管减少了体积,支持个性化收集计划的价值。这些“第2天优势”可以为产量预测的改进提供信息,并强调需要进行前瞻性研究以优化分离策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Apheresis publishes articles dealing with all aspects of hemapheresis. Articles welcomed for review include those reporting basic research and clinical applications of therapeutic plasma exchange, therapeutic cytapheresis, therapeutic absorption, blood component collection and transfusion, donor recruitment and safety, administration of hemapheresis centers, and innovative applications of hemapheresis technology. Experimental studies, clinical trials, case reports, and concise reviews will be welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信