Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Diabetes and Previous Stroke: A Post-Hoc Analysis of ACCORD-BP Trial

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Zhixian Wang, Jue Wang, Liu He, Chao Jiang, Yufeng Wang, Ting Shen, Meiqi Zhao, Enze Li, Ning Zhou, Caihua Sang, Xin Du, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma
{"title":"Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Diabetes and Previous Stroke: A Post-Hoc Analysis of ACCORD-BP Trial","authors":"Zhixian Wang,&nbsp;Jue Wang,&nbsp;Liu He,&nbsp;Chao Jiang,&nbsp;Yufeng Wang,&nbsp;Ting Shen,&nbsp;Meiqi Zhao,&nbsp;Enze Li,&nbsp;Ning Zhou,&nbsp;Caihua Sang,&nbsp;Xin Du,&nbsp;Jianzeng Dong,&nbsp;Changsheng Ma","doi":"10.1111/jch.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control reduces cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients, but its effects in those with diabetes and prior stroke need further evidence. Among 4733 patients with elevated SBP enrolled in the ACCORD-BP (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes–Blood Pressure) trial, this post-hoc analysis focused on 307 patients with type 2 diabetes and prior stroke to evaluate intensive versus standard SBP control. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed with a 3-year conditional landmark. Multivariable Cox regression models and overlap weighting models were constructed in sensitivity analysis. In landmark analysis at the 3-year time point, intensive SBP control was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32–0.95) using the IPTW Cox model. The associations remained consistent across multivariable Cox regression model (HR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.31–0.90) and overlap weighting model (HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32–0.94). Patients in the intensive SBP control group showed a trend toward lower recurrent stroke risk, though it was not statistically significant (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.30–1.37). Similar trends were observed in subgroup analyses. In conclusion, targeting an SBP below 120 mmHg in patients with diabetes and prior stroke is associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of recurrent stroke.</p><p><b>Trial Registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00000620</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.70095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control reduces cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients, but its effects in those with diabetes and prior stroke need further evidence. Among 4733 patients with elevated SBP enrolled in the ACCORD-BP (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes–Blood Pressure) trial, this post-hoc analysis focused on 307 patients with type 2 diabetes and prior stroke to evaluate intensive versus standard SBP control. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed with a 3-year conditional landmark. Multivariable Cox regression models and overlap weighting models were constructed in sensitivity analysis. In landmark analysis at the 3-year time point, intensive SBP control was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32–0.95) using the IPTW Cox model. The associations remained consistent across multivariable Cox regression model (HR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.31–0.90) and overlap weighting model (HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32–0.94). Patients in the intensive SBP control group showed a trend toward lower recurrent stroke risk, though it was not statistically significant (HR 0.65, 95% CI, 0.30–1.37). Similar trends were observed in subgroup analyses. In conclusion, targeting an SBP below 120 mmHg in patients with diabetes and prior stroke is associated with a lower risk of major cardiovascular events without increasing the risk of recurrent stroke.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00000620

Abstract Image

糖尿病和既往卒中患者强化血压控制:ACCORD-BP试验的事后分析
强化收缩压(SBP)控制可降低高血压患者的心血管结局,但其对糖尿病和既往卒中患者的影响需要进一步的证据。在4733名收缩压升高的患者中加入了ACCORD-BP(控制糖尿病心血管风险的行动-血压)试验,这项事后分析集中在307名2型糖尿病患者和既往卒中患者中,以评估强化与标准收缩压控制。主要终点是主要心血管不良事件(MACE),即心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死或非致死性卒中的综合结果。采用3年条件地标进行治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)校正Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归分析。在敏感性分析中,构建了多变量Cox回归模型和重叠加权模型。在3年时间点的里程碑分析中,使用IPTW Cox模型,强化收压控制与MACE风险显著降低相关(风险比[HR] 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32-0.95)。在多变量Cox回归模型(HR 0.53, 95% CI, 0.31-0.90)和重叠加权模型(HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.32-0.94)中,相关性保持一致。强化收缩压对照组患者卒中复发风险降低,但差异无统计学意义(HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.30-1.37)。在亚组分析中也观察到类似的趋势。综上所述,有卒中病史的糖尿病患者将收缩压控制在120 mmHg以下,可降低主要心血管事件发生的风险,且不会增加卒中复发的风险。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT00000620
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信