Global energy conservation research: A systematic analysis of thematic areas, methodologies and geographic distribution

IF 8 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Bushra Jan , Muhammad Asif , Mansour Alhazmi
{"title":"Global energy conservation research: A systematic analysis of thematic areas, methodologies and geographic distribution","authors":"Bushra Jan ,&nbsp;Muhammad Asif ,&nbsp;Mansour Alhazmi","doi":"10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy conservation is pivotal in addressing global sustainability and climate change challenges. Despite substantial research in this field, gaps remain in understanding regional priorities and methodological patterns. This systematic review aims to bridge that gap by synthesizing findings from 144 peer-reviewed studies, selected using PRISMA guidelines and validated through independent screening and thematic analysis. The study first explores thematic and geographical distributions, categorizing research into four primary areas: Behavioral Interventions, Policy and Governance, Educational and Awareness Campaigns, and Technological and Data-Driven Solutions. The analysis reveals that 87 % of studies focus on specific regions, with developed countries accounting for 65.6 %—highlighting strong institutional and infrastructural support—while developing countries represent 34.4 %, focusing more on culturally adapted behavioral and policy approaches. Both groups show a strong preference for mixed methods (48.8 %), though quantitative approaches are more common in developing regions (46.5 %) compared to developed ones (39 %). Qualitative methods remain underutilized, particularly in developing countries (4.7 %). The findings emphasize the urgent need for greater international collaboration and tailored policy frameworks. By promoting knowledge transfer and context-sensitive strategies, this review offers actionable insights to enhance global energy conservation efforts and advance progress toward sustainable development goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93548,"journal":{"name":"Energy nexus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100477"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy conservation is pivotal in addressing global sustainability and climate change challenges. Despite substantial research in this field, gaps remain in understanding regional priorities and methodological patterns. This systematic review aims to bridge that gap by synthesizing findings from 144 peer-reviewed studies, selected using PRISMA guidelines and validated through independent screening and thematic analysis. The study first explores thematic and geographical distributions, categorizing research into four primary areas: Behavioral Interventions, Policy and Governance, Educational and Awareness Campaigns, and Technological and Data-Driven Solutions. The analysis reveals that 87 % of studies focus on specific regions, with developed countries accounting for 65.6 %—highlighting strong institutional and infrastructural support—while developing countries represent 34.4 %, focusing more on culturally adapted behavioral and policy approaches. Both groups show a strong preference for mixed methods (48.8 %), though quantitative approaches are more common in developing regions (46.5 %) compared to developed ones (39 %). Qualitative methods remain underutilized, particularly in developing countries (4.7 %). The findings emphasize the urgent need for greater international collaboration and tailored policy frameworks. By promoting knowledge transfer and context-sensitive strategies, this review offers actionable insights to enhance global energy conservation efforts and advance progress toward sustainable development goals.
全球节能研究:专题领域、方法和地理分布的系统分析
节约能源是应对全球可持续发展和气候变化挑战的关键。尽管在这一领域进行了大量研究,但在了解区域优先事项和方法模式方面仍然存在差距。本系统审查旨在通过综合144项同行评议研究的结果来弥补这一差距,这些研究是根据PRISMA指南选出的,并通过独立筛选和专题分析进行验证。该研究首先探讨了主题和地理分布,将研究分为四个主要领域:行为干预、政策和治理、教育和意识运动以及技术和数据驱动的解决方案。分析显示,87%的研究侧重于特定地区,其中发达国家占65.6%,突出了强有力的制度和基础设施支持,而发展中国家占34.4%,更多地关注与文化相适应的行为和政策方法。这两个群体都对混合方法表现出强烈的偏好(48.8%),尽管与发达地区(39%)相比,定量方法在发展中地区更为常见(46.5%)。定性方法仍未得到充分利用,特别是在发展中国家(4.7%)。研究结果强调,迫切需要加强国际合作和制定有针对性的政策框架。通过促进知识转移和环境敏感战略,本综述为加强全球节能工作和推进可持续发展目标提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy nexus
Energy nexus Energy (General), Ecological Modelling, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Water Science and Technology, Agricultural and Biological Sciences (General)
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
109 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信