Navigating barriers: examining social equality through transportation disadvantages and perceived healthcare accessibility in South Carolina

IF 6.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Yihong Ning , Songyuan Deng , Yuche Chen
{"title":"Navigating barriers: examining social equality through transportation disadvantages and perceived healthcare accessibility in South Carolina","authors":"Yihong Ning ,&nbsp;Songyuan Deng ,&nbsp;Yuche Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transportation inequities significantly contribute to health disparities, particularly in socially and geographically diverse regions like South Carolina. Prior research predominantly relied on objective measurements, like travel time or distance, to assess healthcare accessibility. However, limited attention has been given to the subjective perceptions of transportation barriers. To address this gap, we designed a comprehensive survey consisting of 61 questions (including 32 five-point Likert-scale items) capturing demographic, socioeconomic, and travel behavior data from a diverse sample of South Carolina residents. Urban and rural contexts were distinguished using county categorization and built environment measures. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was employed to identify latent factors, including Financial and Time Constraints, Safety and Security Concerns, and Accessibility Challenges, related to perceived transportation barriers. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was subsequently applied to analyze interactions among these factors shaping accessibility perceptions of access demographic groups. Our findings highlight that Financial and Time Constraints represent the most significant barriers, disproportionately affecting low-income and minority populations. Additionally, built environment factors such as population density appear as important predictors of perceived accessibility, with urban residents reporting better access than rural residents. The study provides targeted policy recommendations to improve public transit affordability and enhance transportation safety, emphasizing the importance of addressing both objective and subjective obstacles to achieve better health equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 104607"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425002356","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transportation inequities significantly contribute to health disparities, particularly in socially and geographically diverse regions like South Carolina. Prior research predominantly relied on objective measurements, like travel time or distance, to assess healthcare accessibility. However, limited attention has been given to the subjective perceptions of transportation barriers. To address this gap, we designed a comprehensive survey consisting of 61 questions (including 32 five-point Likert-scale items) capturing demographic, socioeconomic, and travel behavior data from a diverse sample of South Carolina residents. Urban and rural contexts were distinguished using county categorization and built environment measures. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) was employed to identify latent factors, including Financial and Time Constraints, Safety and Security Concerns, and Accessibility Challenges, related to perceived transportation barriers. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was subsequently applied to analyze interactions among these factors shaping accessibility perceptions of access demographic groups. Our findings highlight that Financial and Time Constraints represent the most significant barriers, disproportionately affecting low-income and minority populations. Additionally, built environment factors such as population density appear as important predictors of perceived accessibility, with urban residents reporting better access than rural residents. The study provides targeted policy recommendations to improve public transit affordability and enhance transportation safety, emphasizing the importance of addressing both objective and subjective obstacles to achieve better health equity.
导航障碍:通过交通劣势和感知的南卡罗来纳州医疗保健可及性来检查社会平等
交通运输的不平等在很大程度上导致了健康差异,特别是在社会和地理上不同的地区,如南卡罗来纳州。先前的研究主要依赖于客观测量,如旅行时间或距离,来评估医疗保健的可及性。然而,对运输障碍的主观看法给予的注意有限。为了解决这一差距,我们设计了一项由61个问题(包括32个五点李克特量表项目)组成的综合调查,从南卡罗来纳州居民的不同样本中获取人口统计、社会经济和旅行行为数据。使用县分类和建筑环境措施区分城市和农村环境。探索性因素分析(EFA)用于识别潜在因素,包括与感知运输障碍相关的财务和时间限制、安全和保障问题以及可达性挑战。结构方程模型(SEM)随后应用于分析这些因素之间的相互作用,形成无障碍人口群体的感知。我们的研究结果强调,资金和时间限制是最大的障碍,对低收入和少数民族人口的影响尤为严重。此外,人口密度等建筑环境因素似乎是感知可达性的重要预测因素,城市居民报告的可达性优于农村居民。该研究提供了有针对性的政策建议,以提高公共交通的可负担性和加强交通安全,强调解决客观和主观障碍的重要性,以实现更好的卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信