Mahla Tayefi Nasrabadi , Taimaz Larimian , Tan Yigitcanlar
{"title":"Developing a measurement model to assess perceived housing inequality: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses","authors":"Mahla Tayefi Nasrabadi , Taimaz Larimian , Tan Yigitcanlar","doi":"10.1016/j.cities.2025.106276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Housing inequality and resulting housing crisis are pressing global issues with significant socioeconomic implications. This study develops a robust measurement model for assessing housing inequality from residents' perspectives, filling a critical gap in the existing literature that largely overlooks subjective perceptions. By conceptualising housing inequality as a multidimensional construct encompassing affordability, sanitation, comfort, maintenance, safety and security, space, local facilities, accessibility, and social inclusivity, our model captures nuanced disparities that conventional metrics may miss. This study addresses the lack of a standardised measurement model for perceived housing inequality, which has hindered comparative research and policy development. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), the model was validated through data from Nottingham, a city from the UK with notable socioeconomic diversity and high deprivation levels. Study findings highlight that perceived housing inequality, rooted in individual assessments of housing quality, affordability, and neighbourhood environment, is equally significant as its traditional nature, which mostly focuses on objective indicators such as income or housing availability. Theoretically, the study challenges conventional economic and spatial debates that rely solely on objective measures. It highlights the role of perception in shaping urban experiences and social cohesion, offering a holistic framework that integrates subjective dimensions of housing inequality. This study provides insights that researchers, local authorities, and policymakers can use to assess perceived housing inequality more accurately, guiding targeted interventions and promoting equitable urban development across diverse urban contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48405,"journal":{"name":"Cities","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 106276"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264275125005773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Housing inequality and resulting housing crisis are pressing global issues with significant socioeconomic implications. This study develops a robust measurement model for assessing housing inequality from residents' perspectives, filling a critical gap in the existing literature that largely overlooks subjective perceptions. By conceptualising housing inequality as a multidimensional construct encompassing affordability, sanitation, comfort, maintenance, safety and security, space, local facilities, accessibility, and social inclusivity, our model captures nuanced disparities that conventional metrics may miss. This study addresses the lack of a standardised measurement model for perceived housing inequality, which has hindered comparative research and policy development. Using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA), the model was validated through data from Nottingham, a city from the UK with notable socioeconomic diversity and high deprivation levels. Study findings highlight that perceived housing inequality, rooted in individual assessments of housing quality, affordability, and neighbourhood environment, is equally significant as its traditional nature, which mostly focuses on objective indicators such as income or housing availability. Theoretically, the study challenges conventional economic and spatial debates that rely solely on objective measures. It highlights the role of perception in shaping urban experiences and social cohesion, offering a holistic framework that integrates subjective dimensions of housing inequality. This study provides insights that researchers, local authorities, and policymakers can use to assess perceived housing inequality more accurately, guiding targeted interventions and promoting equitable urban development across diverse urban contexts.
期刊介绍:
Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.