Why this app: How user ratings and app store rankings impact parents’ choice of educational apps

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Emma Liptrot, Armaghan Montazami, Heather Ann Pearson, Adam Kenneth Dubé
{"title":"Why this app: How user ratings and app store rankings impact parents’ choice of educational apps","authors":"Emma Liptrot,&nbsp;Armaghan Montazami,&nbsp;Heather Ann Pearson,&nbsp;Adam Kenneth Dubé","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Parents should look for benchmarks of educational quality (curriculum, feedback, scaffolding, learning theory, and development team) to distinguish good apps from the abundance of poor-quality apps available in mobile app stores. If parents instead base their choices on user ratings or the app's ranking in the top charts of the education category, they risk selecting apps that do not offer quality educational experiences for their children. Thus, the present study investigates how ratings, rankings, and educational benchmarks impact parents' choices of educational apps. One-hundred and forty-nine parents of children in kindergarten to grade 6 viewed and evaluated 18 researcher-created educational math app pages. Results from a repeated-measures MANOVA and non-parametric tests revealed that parents were more likely to download, pay more for, and rate apps higher when they had positive user ratings, with a large effect, and parents generally preferred apps with bottom rankings, with a medium effect. Yet, the effect of educational benchmarks on parents' decisions was unclear. This study demonstrates an important problem in parents' app selection: when user ratings are available in app stores, parents rely heavily on this poor source of evidence of educational quality to choose apps for their kids. To address this, researchers should develop trainings and guidelines to help parents evaluate educational quality, and app stores should improve their rating and ranking systems to facilitate the selection of high-quality educational apps.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 105410"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525001782","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parents should look for benchmarks of educational quality (curriculum, feedback, scaffolding, learning theory, and development team) to distinguish good apps from the abundance of poor-quality apps available in mobile app stores. If parents instead base their choices on user ratings or the app's ranking in the top charts of the education category, they risk selecting apps that do not offer quality educational experiences for their children. Thus, the present study investigates how ratings, rankings, and educational benchmarks impact parents' choices of educational apps. One-hundred and forty-nine parents of children in kindergarten to grade 6 viewed and evaluated 18 researcher-created educational math app pages. Results from a repeated-measures MANOVA and non-parametric tests revealed that parents were more likely to download, pay more for, and rate apps higher when they had positive user ratings, with a large effect, and parents generally preferred apps with bottom rankings, with a medium effect. Yet, the effect of educational benchmarks on parents' decisions was unclear. This study demonstrates an important problem in parents' app selection: when user ratings are available in app stores, parents rely heavily on this poor source of evidence of educational quality to choose apps for their kids. To address this, researchers should develop trainings and guidelines to help parents evaluate educational quality, and app stores should improve their rating and ranking systems to facilitate the selection of high-quality educational apps.
为什么选择这款应用:用户评分和应用商店排名如何影响家长对教育应用的选择
家长应该寻找教育质量的基准(课程、反馈、脚手架、学习理论和开发团队),以便从手机应用商店中大量质量低劣的应用中区分出优秀的应用。如果家长根据用户评分或应用在教育类排行榜上的排名来选择应用,他们可能会选择不能为孩子提供高质量教育体验的应用。因此,本研究调查了评级、排名和教育基准如何影响家长对教育应用程序的选择。149名幼儿园到六年级孩子的家长查看并评估了18个研究人员创建的教育数学应用程序页面。重复测量方差分析和非参数测试的结果显示,当应用获得积极的用户评价时,父母更有可能下载、支付更多的费用,并给予更高的评价,这一影响很大,而父母通常更喜欢排名靠后的应用,这一影响中等。然而,教育基准对家长决定的影响尚不清楚。这项研究表明了家长在选择应用程序时的一个重要问题:当应用程序商店中有用户评分时,家长在为孩子选择应用程序时严重依赖于这个糟糕的教育质量证据来源。为了解决这个问题,研究人员应该开发培训和指南,帮助家长评估教育质量,应用商店应该改进他们的评级和排名系统,以方便选择高质量的教育应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信