Partial ignorance: strategies for coping with inconvenient information

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dianna R. Amasino, Margarita Leib
{"title":"Partial ignorance: strategies for coping with inconvenient information","authors":"Dianna R. Amasino, Margarita Leib","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Willful ignorance – intentionally avoiding inconvenient information – allows individuals to act selfishly without spoiling their positive image. Yet, full avoidance is not always possible, especially in today’s information-rich environments. We propose that when ignorance is not possible, individuals use more subtle information-processing strategies to achieve the same result. These partial ignorance strategies include limiting exposure to inconvenient information, seeking contradictory information, and interpreting information in self-serving ways to maintain a positive image while behaving selfishly. Therefore, to effectively promote prosociality, interventions should go beyond confronting individuals with inconvenient information. Instead, interventions should focus on mitigating the more subtle strategies individuals use. We present potentially promising interventions and raise open research questions that merit further exploration. Understanding these subtle information-processing strategies and developing interventions to tackle them is important to promote prosociality.","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Willful ignorance – intentionally avoiding inconvenient information – allows individuals to act selfishly without spoiling their positive image. Yet, full avoidance is not always possible, especially in today’s information-rich environments. We propose that when ignorance is not possible, individuals use more subtle information-processing strategies to achieve the same result. These partial ignorance strategies include limiting exposure to inconvenient information, seeking contradictory information, and interpreting information in self-serving ways to maintain a positive image while behaving selfishly. Therefore, to effectively promote prosociality, interventions should go beyond confronting individuals with inconvenient information. Instead, interventions should focus on mitigating the more subtle strategies individuals use. We present potentially promising interventions and raise open research questions that merit further exploration. Understanding these subtle information-processing strategies and developing interventions to tackle them is important to promote prosociality.
部分无知:处理不方便信息的策略
故意的无知——故意回避不方便的信息——允许个人自私地行事,而不会破坏他们的正面形象。然而,完全避免并不总是可能的,尤其是在当今信息丰富的环境中。我们提出,当不可能无知时,个体使用更微妙的信息处理策略来达到同样的结果。这些部分无知策略包括限制接触不方便的信息,寻求矛盾的信息,以自私的方式解释信息,以保持积极的形象,同时表现得自私。因此,为了有效地促进亲社会,干预措施不应局限于让个体面对不方便的信息。相反,干预应侧重于减轻个人使用的更微妙的策略。我们提出了潜在的有希望的干预措施,并提出了值得进一步探索的开放性研究问题。了解这些微妙的信息处理策略并制定干预措施来解决它们对于促进亲社会是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信