The Relevance of Relevance: A Conceptual Framework for Identifying Willful Ignorance

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mengchen Hu, Jacob L. Orquin
{"title":"The Relevance of Relevance: A Conceptual Framework for Identifying Willful Ignorance","authors":"Mengchen Hu, Jacob L. Orquin","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Willful ignorance refers to any behavior intended to prevent or delay the acquisition of available, relevant, and free information. Current research assumes that willful ignorance and information seeking are the opposite ends of a single continuum. However, this assumption fails to account for information relevance and we show how this may lead to an overestimation of the prevalence of willful ignorance as well as a misinterpretation of its behavioral effects. To address this, we propose a conceptual framework consisting of two dimensions: information acquisition and information relevance. The framework distinguishes willful ignorance from related constructs, such as rational inattention and omission. Based on this framework, we propose remedies for more accurate measurement of willful ignorance.","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Willful ignorance refers to any behavior intended to prevent or delay the acquisition of available, relevant, and free information. Current research assumes that willful ignorance and information seeking are the opposite ends of a single continuum. However, this assumption fails to account for information relevance and we show how this may lead to an overestimation of the prevalence of willful ignorance as well as a misinterpretation of its behavioral effects. To address this, we propose a conceptual framework consisting of two dimensions: information acquisition and information relevance. The framework distinguishes willful ignorance from related constructs, such as rational inattention and omission. Based on this framework, we propose remedies for more accurate measurement of willful ignorance.
关联的相关性:识别故意无知的概念框架
故意无知是指任何旨在阻止或延迟获取可用的、相关的和免费的信息的行为。目前的研究认为,故意无知和信息寻求是一个连续体的两端。然而,这一假设未能解释信息相关性,我们展示了这可能会导致对故意无知的普遍程度的高估以及对其行为影响的误解。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个由两个维度组成的概念框架:信息获取和信息关联。该框架将故意无知与相关构念(如理性不注意和遗漏)区分开来。基于这个框架,我们提出了更准确地衡量故意无知的补救措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信