Long-term validation and error analysis of MODIS and VIIRS dark target aerosol products in Africa

IF 4.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Xiaoxia Xue , Leiku Yang , Ping Zhang , Muhammad Bilal , Weiqian Ji , Xin Pei , Yizhe Fan , Xiaofeng Lu , Xiaoqian Cheng
{"title":"Long-term validation and error analysis of MODIS and VIIRS dark target aerosol products in Africa","authors":"Xiaoxia Xue ,&nbsp;Leiku Yang ,&nbsp;Ping Zhang ,&nbsp;Muhammad Bilal ,&nbsp;Weiqian Ji ,&nbsp;Xin Pei ,&nbsp;Yizhe Fan ,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Lu ,&nbsp;Xiaoqian Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study reports the accuracy and uncertainty of aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrievals for the dark target (DT) algorithm over Africa. Three AOD products from the Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), the NOAA-20 Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), and the Suomi-NPP (SNPP) VIIRS were evaluated against ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations during the period from 2018 to 2023. The validation results indicate that all three products show good validation accuracy in northern Africa, with a slight underestimation in southern Africa. However, it is worth noting that a severe systematic underestimation was observed for all three products in western Africa. Although the correlation coefficients (R) between these three products and the AERONET observations in western Africa are all greater than 0.9, they exhibit significant negative mean biases (MB) of less than −0.18 and root mean square errors (RMSE) exceeding 0.25. Subsequently, an in-depth analysis of error dependence was conducted to explore the underlying causes of this underestimation in this region. The analysis reveals that the aerosol model assumptions and surface reflectance estimation in the DT algorithm jointly lead to this underestimation. Specifically, the underestimation is more pronounced under conditions of strongly absorbing aerosols and sparse vegetation surfaces with high reflectance. Additionally, it was found that as the scattering angle (SCA) increases, the degree of AOD underestimation also intensifies. These results provide critical insights to guide the ongoing refinement of the DT algorithm in western Africa.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8600,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Research","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 108372"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169809525004648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study reports the accuracy and uncertainty of aerosol optical depth (AOD) retrievals for the dark target (DT) algorithm over Africa. Three AOD products from the Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), the NOAA-20 Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS), and the Suomi-NPP (SNPP) VIIRS were evaluated against ground-based Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) observations during the period from 2018 to 2023. The validation results indicate that all three products show good validation accuracy in northern Africa, with a slight underestimation in southern Africa. However, it is worth noting that a severe systematic underestimation was observed for all three products in western Africa. Although the correlation coefficients (R) between these three products and the AERONET observations in western Africa are all greater than 0.9, they exhibit significant negative mean biases (MB) of less than −0.18 and root mean square errors (RMSE) exceeding 0.25. Subsequently, an in-depth analysis of error dependence was conducted to explore the underlying causes of this underestimation in this region. The analysis reveals that the aerosol model assumptions and surface reflectance estimation in the DT algorithm jointly lead to this underestimation. Specifically, the underestimation is more pronounced under conditions of strongly absorbing aerosols and sparse vegetation surfaces with high reflectance. Additionally, it was found that as the scattering angle (SCA) increases, the degree of AOD underestimation also intensifies. These results provide critical insights to guide the ongoing refinement of the DT algorithm in western Africa.
非洲MODIS和VIIRS暗靶气溶胶产品的长期验证和误差分析
本研究报告了非洲上空暗目标(DT)算法的气溶胶光学深度(AOD)检索的准确性和不确定性。利用2018 - 2023年陆基气溶胶机器人网络(AERONET)观测资料,对Aqua中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)、NOAA-20可见光红外成像辐射计套件(VIIRS)和Suomi-NPP (SNPP) VIIRS的3种AOD产品进行了评估。验证结果表明,这三种产品在北非都具有良好的验证精度,而在南部非洲则略有低估。然而,值得注意的是,西非所有三种产品都存在严重的系统性低估。尽管这三种产品与西非AERONET观测值之间的相关系数(R)均大于0.9,但它们表现出显著的负平均偏差(MB)小于- 0.18,均方根误差(RMSE)超过0.25。随后,我们对误差相关性进行了深入分析,以探讨该地区这种低估的根本原因。分析表明,DT算法中的气溶胶模式假设和地表反射率估计共同导致了这种低估。特别是在强气溶胶吸收和植被表面稀疏、反射率高的条件下,低估更为明显。此外,随着散射角(SCA)的增大,AOD的低估程度也随之加剧。这些结果为指导西非持续改进DT算法提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Research
Atmospheric Research 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
460
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes scientific papers (research papers, review articles, letters and notes) dealing with the part of the atmosphere where meteorological events occur. Attention is given to all processes extending from the earth surface to the tropopause, but special emphasis continues to be devoted to the physics of clouds, mesoscale meteorology and air pollution, i.e. atmospheric aerosols; microphysical processes; cloud dynamics and thermodynamics; numerical simulation, climatology, climate change and weather modification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信