Marginal pricing and the energy crisis: Where should we go?

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Ibrahim Abada, Andreas Ehrenmann, Yves Smeers
{"title":"Marginal pricing and the energy crisis: Where should we go?","authors":"Ibrahim Abada, Andreas Ehrenmann, Yves Smeers","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fundamental principle of marginal pricing in electricity markets has been challenged following the recent European energy crisis. A main criticism targets the incapacity of current markets to drive investments, as spot prices provide only short-term information about supply, demand, and costs. This paper revisits the seminal work of Boiteux (1960) in the context of the recent energy crisis to discuss the fundamental assumption of <ce:italic>adapted capacity</ce:italic>, which underpins the equality between long-term and short-term marginal costs in the theory of marginal pricing. We argue that capacity is no longer adapted to current economic conditions in Europe. We then leverage mathematical programming techniques to generalize the results of Boiteux (1960) and propose a market-clearing mechanism that preserves the efficiency of current short-term marginal pricing to drive optimal plant operations while also providing a long-term investment signal when capacities are not necessarily adapted to current economic conditions. Through an analysis of captured margins, our proposal, which differs only marginally from the current market-clearing mechanism, identifies plants that should remain in the current mix and those that are no longer economical. We also discuss possible extensions of our proposal to accommodate capacity markets and price caps. Finally, we implement our models with the French power mix and demonstrate their advantages over the current market-clearing mechanism using a realistic case study.","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"665 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108716","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fundamental principle of marginal pricing in electricity markets has been challenged following the recent European energy crisis. A main criticism targets the incapacity of current markets to drive investments, as spot prices provide only short-term information about supply, demand, and costs. This paper revisits the seminal work of Boiteux (1960) in the context of the recent energy crisis to discuss the fundamental assumption of adapted capacity, which underpins the equality between long-term and short-term marginal costs in the theory of marginal pricing. We argue that capacity is no longer adapted to current economic conditions in Europe. We then leverage mathematical programming techniques to generalize the results of Boiteux (1960) and propose a market-clearing mechanism that preserves the efficiency of current short-term marginal pricing to drive optimal plant operations while also providing a long-term investment signal when capacities are not necessarily adapted to current economic conditions. Through an analysis of captured margins, our proposal, which differs only marginally from the current market-clearing mechanism, identifies plants that should remain in the current mix and those that are no longer economical. We also discuss possible extensions of our proposal to accommodate capacity markets and price caps. Finally, we implement our models with the French power mix and demonstrate their advantages over the current market-clearing mechanism using a realistic case study.
边际定价与能源危机:我们该何去何从?
在最近的欧洲能源危机之后,电力市场边际定价的基本原则受到了挑战。一种主要批评针对当前市场无法推动投资,因为现货价格只能提供有关供应、需求和成本的短期信息。本文在最近的能源危机背景下回顾了Boiteux(1960)的开创性工作,讨论了适应能力的基本假设,该假设支撑了边际定价理论中长期和短期边际成本之间的平等。我们认为,产能已不再适应欧洲当前的经济状况。然后,我们利用数学规划技术来推广Boiteux(1960)的结果,并提出了一种市场清算机制,该机制保留了当前短期边际定价的效率,以驱动最佳工厂运营,同时在产能不一定适应当前经济条件时提供长期投资信号。通过对捕获利润的分析,我们的建议(与目前的市场清算机制仅略有不同)确定了应该保留在当前组合中的工厂和那些不再具有经济效益的工厂。我们还讨论了扩大产能市场和价格上限的可能性。最后,我们以法国电力组合为例实施了我们的模型,并通过实际案例研究证明了它们相对于当前市场出清机制的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信