Strengthening Continuing Professional Development through Active Collaboration.

IF 1.9 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Nitin Seam, Joseph Green, David W Price
{"title":"Strengthening Continuing Professional Development through Active Collaboration.","authors":"Nitin Seam, Joseph Green, David W Price","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0115PS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuing professional development (CPD) offerings in pulmonary and critical care medicine, such as grand rounds lectures and online trainings, are traditionally chosen on the basis of physician interest or expert opinion. The current era of rapid growth in medical innovation requires high-value education for clinicians to prevent decay of knowledge and learn new skills, with an eye to addressing performance gaps and improving clinical outcomes, rather than meeting local licensing requirements. Faculty development for CPD on how to explicitly plan and design high-value educational interventions for faculty members and measuring improvements in practice is needed. CPD courses should adhere to principles of effective adult learning, with faculty members taught to incorporate active learning strategies into multimodal, longitudinal educational interventions that are most effective in translating learning into sustained practice. CPD activities should allow time for reflection, practice, and feedback and include practical tips so that attendees can immediately apply learnings in their work setting. Providers of CPD should work with local quality improvement and implementation leaders so that CPD aligns with complex organizational needs and clinical gaps so that offerings are directed at improving clinical care at the local level. We suggest that organizations identify \"just one opportunity\" to develop such an intervention that addresses a local organizational priority, with buy-in from clinician educator collaborators with leadership sponsors. Organizations should further incentivize such work with local and regional scholarship opportunities that provide academic recognition for the efforts. Creative strategies may be necessary to provide resources for such high-value CPD. Regional interinstitutional learning collaboratives may be helpful in sharing infrastructure, conserving cost, sharing faculty members, and providing space and equipment to develop CPD programs that are of mutual interest to local healthcare systems. Evidence-based guidelines and implementation materials provided by national professional societies can be adapted by local CPD teams to their organizational context. Education researchers involved in these programs could pursue small grants from foundations or government agencies to help defray costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0115PS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Continuing professional development (CPD) offerings in pulmonary and critical care medicine, such as grand rounds lectures and online trainings, are traditionally chosen on the basis of physician interest or expert opinion. The current era of rapid growth in medical innovation requires high-value education for clinicians to prevent decay of knowledge and learn new skills, with an eye to addressing performance gaps and improving clinical outcomes, rather than meeting local licensing requirements. Faculty development for CPD on how to explicitly plan and design high-value educational interventions for faculty members and measuring improvements in practice is needed. CPD courses should adhere to principles of effective adult learning, with faculty members taught to incorporate active learning strategies into multimodal, longitudinal educational interventions that are most effective in translating learning into sustained practice. CPD activities should allow time for reflection, practice, and feedback and include practical tips so that attendees can immediately apply learnings in their work setting. Providers of CPD should work with local quality improvement and implementation leaders so that CPD aligns with complex organizational needs and clinical gaps so that offerings are directed at improving clinical care at the local level. We suggest that organizations identify "just one opportunity" to develop such an intervention that addresses a local organizational priority, with buy-in from clinician educator collaborators with leadership sponsors. Organizations should further incentivize such work with local and regional scholarship opportunities that provide academic recognition for the efforts. Creative strategies may be necessary to provide resources for such high-value CPD. Regional interinstitutional learning collaboratives may be helpful in sharing infrastructure, conserving cost, sharing faculty members, and providing space and equipment to develop CPD programs that are of mutual interest to local healthcare systems. Evidence-based guidelines and implementation materials provided by national professional societies can be adapted by local CPD teams to their organizational context. Education researchers involved in these programs could pursue small grants from foundations or government agencies to help defray costs.

通过积极合作加强持续专业发展。
肺部和重症医学的持续专业发展(CPD)课程,如大查房讲座和在线培训,传统上是根据医生的兴趣或专家意见来选择的。当前医疗创新快速增长的时代需要对临床医生进行高价值的教育,以防止知识衰退和学习新技能,着眼于解决绩效差距和改善临床结果,而不是满足当地的许可要求。在如何明确地为教师规划和设计高价值的教育干预措施以及衡量实践中的改进方面,需要对持续专业发展的教师进行发展。CPD课程应坚持有效的成人学习原则,教授教师将积极的学习策略融入多模式、纵向的教育干预中,以最有效地将学习转化为持续的实践。CPD活动应该有时间进行反思、练习和反馈,并包括实用技巧,以便参与者能够立即将所学知识应用到他们的工作环境中。CPD的提供者应该与当地的质量改进和实施领导者合作,这样CPD才能与复杂的组织需求和临床差距保持一致,这样提供的服务就能直接改善当地的临床护理。我们建议组织确定“只有一个机会”来开发这样的干预措施,解决当地组织的优先事项,并得到临床医生、教育者、合作者和领导赞助商的支持。各组织应进一步鼓励这种工作,提供地方和区域奖学金机会,为这些努力提供学术认可。为这种高价值的持续专业发展提供资源,创造性策略可能是必要的。区域机构间学习合作可能有助于共享基础设施,节约成本,共享教员,并提供空间和设备,以开发对当地医疗保健系统共同感兴趣的CPD项目。国家专业协会提供的循证指南和实施材料可由地方持续专业发展小组根据其组织情况加以调整。参与这些项目的教育研究人员可以向基金会或政府机构寻求小额赠款,以帮助支付费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信