Prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of suboptimal glycemic control in persons with diabetes in Ghana: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0327610
Emmanuel Ekpor, Dorothy Wilson, Eric Peprah Osei, Bernard Abeiku Mensah, Samuel Akyirem
{"title":"Prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of suboptimal glycemic control in persons with diabetes in Ghana: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Emmanuel Ekpor, Dorothy Wilson, Eric Peprah Osei, Bernard Abeiku Mensah, Samuel Akyirem","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0327610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective glycemic control is a cornerstone of diabetes management, essential for reducing the risk of complications and mortality. However, in Ghana, persistent limitations in diabetes management capacity present significant challenges to meeting recommended glycemic targets. This systematic review synthesizes the available evidence on the prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of suboptimal glycemic control among individuals with diabetes in Ghana. Relevant observational studies were obtained through a systematic search conducted on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Global health, Scopus, and Web of Science, from their inception to November 29, 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of suboptimal glycemic control, accounting for heterogeneity across studies. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential sources of variability. We assessed publication bias statistically using Egger's regression and Begg's rank correlation test. Out of 1390 articles screened, 28 meet the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 11,242 participants. The pooled prevalence of suboptimal glycemic control was 67.6% (95% CI: 64.2-70.8). When stratified by glycemic control measures, the prevalence was 69.2% (95% CI: 62.5-75.2) for fasting blood glucose levels ≥7.0 mmol/L and 66.9% (95% CI: 62.5-70.9) for hemoglobin A1c levels ≥7.0%. Sociodemographic factors such as age, income, gender, and ethnicity were found to be associated with suboptimal glycemic control. These findings underscore the substantial burden of suboptimal glycemic control among individuals with diabetes in Ghana, with over two-thirds not meeting recommended targets. There is an urgent need for targeted, context-specific interventions to address both clinical and systemic barriers to effective diabetes management in Ghana.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0327610"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0327610","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective glycemic control is a cornerstone of diabetes management, essential for reducing the risk of complications and mortality. However, in Ghana, persistent limitations in diabetes management capacity present significant challenges to meeting recommended glycemic targets. This systematic review synthesizes the available evidence on the prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of suboptimal glycemic control among individuals with diabetes in Ghana. Relevant observational studies were obtained through a systematic search conducted on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Global health, Scopus, and Web of Science, from their inception to November 29, 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of suboptimal glycemic control, accounting for heterogeneity across studies. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential sources of variability. We assessed publication bias statistically using Egger's regression and Begg's rank correlation test. Out of 1390 articles screened, 28 meet the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 11,242 participants. The pooled prevalence of suboptimal glycemic control was 67.6% (95% CI: 64.2-70.8). When stratified by glycemic control measures, the prevalence was 69.2% (95% CI: 62.5-75.2) for fasting blood glucose levels ≥7.0 mmol/L and 66.9% (95% CI: 62.5-70.9) for hemoglobin A1c levels ≥7.0%. Sociodemographic factors such as age, income, gender, and ethnicity were found to be associated with suboptimal glycemic control. These findings underscore the substantial burden of suboptimal glycemic control among individuals with diabetes in Ghana, with over two-thirds not meeting recommended targets. There is an urgent need for targeted, context-specific interventions to address both clinical and systemic barriers to effective diabetes management in Ghana.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

加纳糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳的患病率和社会人口学决定因素:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
有效的血糖控制是糖尿病管理的基石,对降低并发症和死亡率至关重要。然而,在加纳,糖尿病管理能力的持续限制对达到推荐血糖目标提出了重大挑战。本系统综述综合了加纳糖尿病患者中血糖控制不佳的患病率和社会人口学决定因素的现有证据。通过系统检索PubMed, Medline, Embase, Global health, Scopus和Web of Science,从它们成立到2024年11月29日,获得了相关的观察性研究。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计亚理想血糖控制的总患病率,考虑到研究之间的异质性。进行亚组分析以探索变异性的潜在来源。我们采用Egger’s回归和Begg’s秩相关检验对发表偏倚进行统计评估。在筛选的1390篇文章中,28篇符合纳入标准,共包括11,242名参与者。血糖控制不佳的总患病率为67.6% (95% CI: 64.2-70.8)。当按血糖控制措施分层时,空腹血糖水平≥7.0 mmol/L的患病率为69.2% (95% CI: 62.5-75.2),血红蛋白A1c水平≥7.0%的患病率为66.9% (95% CI: 62.5-70.9)。发现年龄、收入、性别和种族等社会人口因素与血糖控制不佳有关。这些发现强调了加纳糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳的沉重负担,超过三分之二的糖尿病患者未达到推荐目标。迫切需要有针对性的、针对具体情况的干预措施,以解决加纳有效管理糖尿病的临床和系统障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信