Cervical deformity correction: comparison of neurological, radiographic, and patient-reported outcome measures by three-column osteotomy level.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether level selection for a three-column osteotomy (3CO) impacts cervical deformity correction outcomes, including neurological, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent a cervical or upper thoracic 3CO for cervical deformity correction by the senior author from 2008 to 2024. Collected outcome measures included neurological outcomes, mechanical complication rates, spinopelvic alignment, and patient-reported outcomes. The minimum follow-up was 1 year.

Results: One hundred fifteen patients were identified who underwent a cervical or upper thoracic 3CO for cervical deformity correction, of whom 77 met inclusion criteria for this study with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. The median age was 66 years, the median BMI was 27, and 43% of patients were male. Sixteen patients underwent a 3CO at the C7-T1 levels and 61 patients at T2-6 levels. Patients who underwent C7-T1 3CO were more likely to experience a new postoperative neurological deficit compared with those who underwent T2-6 3CO (56% vs 18%, p = 0.004), had less correction in their T1 slope (6° vs 18°, p = 0.027), had less correction in C2-T4 sagittal vertical axis (2.8 cm vs 4.9 cm, p = 0.043), and had a worse Neck Disability Index (NDI) score at 1 year compared with baseline (an increase of 7 vs a decrease of 12, p = 0.033).

Conclusions: Cervical deformity patients who underwent a 3CO at C7-T1 had a higher rate of postoperative neurological deficits, less radiographic correction, and worse NDI scores at 1 year compared with patients who underwent a 3CO from T2 to T6. Although 3CO level selection is multifactorial and patient specific, surgeons should consider a 3CO level caudal to T1 when feasible.