Systematic review on biomechanical effects of high-velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0328048
Anke Langenfeld, Mirjam Baechler, Jaap Swanenburg, Malin Mühlemann, Luana Nyirö, Daniel Streuli, Brigitte Wirth, Petra Schweinhardt
{"title":"Systematic review on biomechanical effects of high-velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation.","authors":"Anke Langenfeld, Mirjam Baechler, Jaap Swanenburg, Malin Mühlemann, Luana Nyirö, Daniel Streuli, Brigitte Wirth, Petra Schweinhardt","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0328048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal manipulative therapy uses high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrusts which are clinically effective, but underlying mechanisms are still unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To summarize the evidence for biomechanical effects of HVLA thrusts in asymptomatic and symptomatic humans as well as for a possible link between biomechanical effects and clinical effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An information specialist conducted systematic literature searches in six databases [Medline (OvidSP), Premedline (PubMed), CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Biosis]. Studies were selected by two authors and classified using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Results were qualitatively summarized per biomechanical output [range of motion (ROM) according to the spinal region where HVLA thrusts were applied, facet joint gapping, and spinal stiffness].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thirty-three included studies were heterogeneous regarding participant characteristics, intervention frequency and outcomes. Twenty-seven studies reported on the effects of HVLA thrusts on spinal ROM. There is evidence increased cervical ROM following cervical HVLA thrusts on cervical ROM [9/15 studies with a positive treatment effect (5 low risk of bias/4 some concern) and increased cervical ROM following thoracic HVLA thrusts [8/8 studies (4 low risk of bias/4 some concern)]. The effects of a thoracic and lumbar HVLA thrusts on the respective ROM were less clear. Three (2 low risk/1 some concern) studies on facet joint gapping showed increased gapping following HVLA thrusts compared to side-posture positioning, and a single study (some concern) on spinal stiffness showed no effect of HVLA thrusts. Only one study (some concern) linked the biomechanical to clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HVLA thrusts, either applied to the cervical or the thoracic spine, appear to increase cervical ROM, based on studies with low risk and studies with some concern regarding risk of bias. For all other outcomes, the included studies were too heterogeneous and too few to draw any sound conclusion. Future studies on the biomechanical effects of HVLA thrusts should link the biomechanical to clinical outcomes such as pain and disability.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42018096963.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0328048"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal manipulative therapy uses high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrusts which are clinically effective, but underlying mechanisms are still unknown.

Objective: To summarize the evidence for biomechanical effects of HVLA thrusts in asymptomatic and symptomatic humans as well as for a possible link between biomechanical effects and clinical effectiveness.

Study design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Methods: An information specialist conducted systematic literature searches in six databases [Medline (OvidSP), Premedline (PubMed), CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Biosis]. Studies were selected by two authors and classified using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Results were qualitatively summarized per biomechanical output [range of motion (ROM) according to the spinal region where HVLA thrusts were applied, facet joint gapping, and spinal stiffness].

Results: The thirty-three included studies were heterogeneous regarding participant characteristics, intervention frequency and outcomes. Twenty-seven studies reported on the effects of HVLA thrusts on spinal ROM. There is evidence increased cervical ROM following cervical HVLA thrusts on cervical ROM [9/15 studies with a positive treatment effect (5 low risk of bias/4 some concern) and increased cervical ROM following thoracic HVLA thrusts [8/8 studies (4 low risk of bias/4 some concern)]. The effects of a thoracic and lumbar HVLA thrusts on the respective ROM were less clear. Three (2 low risk/1 some concern) studies on facet joint gapping showed increased gapping following HVLA thrusts compared to side-posture positioning, and a single study (some concern) on spinal stiffness showed no effect of HVLA thrusts. Only one study (some concern) linked the biomechanical to clinical outcomes.

Conclusion: HVLA thrusts, either applied to the cervical or the thoracic spine, appear to increase cervical ROM, based on studies with low risk and studies with some concern regarding risk of bias. For all other outcomes, the included studies were too heterogeneous and too few to draw any sound conclusion. Future studies on the biomechanical effects of HVLA thrusts should link the biomechanical to clinical outcomes such as pain and disability.

Prospero registration: CRD42018096963.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高速、低幅度脊柱推拿生物力学效应的系统综述。
背景:脊柱推拿疗法使用高速低振幅(HVLA)推力,这在临床上是有效的,但潜在的机制尚不清楚。目的:总结HVLA推力在无症状和有症状人群中的生物力学效应的证据,以及生物力学效应与临床疗效之间的可能联系。研究设计:对随机对照试验进行系统评价。方法:由信息专家对Medline (OvidSP)、Premedline (PubMed)、CINAHL、EMBASE、Cochrane和Biosis等6个数据库进行系统文献检索。研究由两位作者选择,并使用改进的Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具(RoB 2)进行分类。根据生物力学输出(根据HVLA插入的脊柱区域的运动范围(ROM)、小关节间隙和脊柱刚度)对结果进行定性总结。结果:纳入的33项研究在参与者特征、干预频率和结果方面存在异质性。27项研究报道了HVLA推入对脊柱ROM的影响。有证据表明,颈椎HVLA推入对颈椎ROM的影响增加了颈椎ROM[9/15项研究具有积极的治疗效果(5项低偏倚风险/4项关注),胸椎HVLA推入后颈椎ROM增加[8/8项研究(4项低偏倚风险/4项关注)]。胸椎和腰椎HVLA推力对各自ROM的影响尚不清楚。三项(2项低风险/1项值得关注)关于小关节间隙的研究表明,与侧位相比,HVLA推力后间隙增加,而一项关于脊柱僵硬的研究(一些值得关注)显示HVLA推力没有影响。只有一项研究(一些关注)将生物力学与临床结果联系起来。结论:基于低风险研究和有一定偏倚风险的研究,应用于颈椎或胸椎的HVLA推力似乎会增加颈椎ROM。对于所有其他结果,纳入的研究太不均匀,而且太少,无法得出任何可靠的结论。未来关于HVLA推力的生物力学效应的研究应该将生物力学与临床结果(如疼痛和残疾)联系起来。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42018096963。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信