Impact of wild pig invasion on 13 years of crop planting in the contiguous United States

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Abigail B. Feuka, Kim M. Pepin, Nathan P. Snow
{"title":"Impact of wild pig invasion on 13 years of crop planting in the contiguous United States","authors":"Abigail B. Feuka,&nbsp;Kim M. Pepin,&nbsp;Nathan P. Snow","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wild pigs (<em>Sus scrofa</em>) are an invasive pest that cause extensive damage to agricultural crops. We examined the extent that planting for five types of crops known to sustain damage from wild pigs (corn [<em>Zea mays</em>], cotton [<em>Gossypium</em> L.], peanuts [<em>Arachis hypogaea</em>], soybeans [<em>Glycine max</em>], and wheat [<em>Triticum</em> spp.]) was influenced by the expansion of wild pigs in counties of the United States (US) during 2009–2022. Specifically, we examined changes in planting anomalies (i.e., the amount planted relative to the long-term average) relative to two variables that could explain wild pig pressure: the proportion of a county with wild pigs and a trend in the intensity of management, while accounting for other variables that could influence decisions to plant. We found that greater overlap with wild pig range was associated with larger planting anomalies for cotton. However, removal of wild pigs did not influence planting anomalies for any crop. We also found that planting anomalies were influenced by return on investment, climate, and the amount of Conservation Reserve Program lands. For some crops, these other factors were more influential than pressures from wild pigs. Our results indicate that producers are planting more cotton in areas with greater presence of wild pigs, and current management efforts to reduce populations of wild pigs are not altering those decisions. Producers switching to lessor-damaged crops as wild pigs expand their range in the US could alter future crop yields, and more intensive efforts to mitigate wild pigs may be needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are an invasive pest that cause extensive damage to agricultural crops. We examined the extent that planting for five types of crops known to sustain damage from wild pigs (corn [Zea mays], cotton [Gossypium L.], peanuts [Arachis hypogaea], soybeans [Glycine max], and wheat [Triticum spp.]) was influenced by the expansion of wild pigs in counties of the United States (US) during 2009–2022. Specifically, we examined changes in planting anomalies (i.e., the amount planted relative to the long-term average) relative to two variables that could explain wild pig pressure: the proportion of a county with wild pigs and a trend in the intensity of management, while accounting for other variables that could influence decisions to plant. We found that greater overlap with wild pig range was associated with larger planting anomalies for cotton. However, removal of wild pigs did not influence planting anomalies for any crop. We also found that planting anomalies were influenced by return on investment, climate, and the amount of Conservation Reserve Program lands. For some crops, these other factors were more influential than pressures from wild pigs. Our results indicate that producers are planting more cotton in areas with greater presence of wild pigs, and current management efforts to reduce populations of wild pigs are not altering those decisions. Producers switching to lessor-damaged crops as wild pigs expand their range in the US could alter future crop yields, and more intensive efforts to mitigate wild pigs may be needed.
野猪入侵对美国连续13年作物种植的影响
野猪(Sus scrofa)是一种对农作物造成广泛破坏的入侵害虫。我们研究了2009-2022年期间美国各县野猪扩张对已知遭受野猪危害的五种作物(玉米[Zea mays]、棉花[Gossypium L.]、花生[arachhis hypogaea]、大豆[Glycine max]和小麦[Triticum spp.])种植的影响程度。具体来说,我们研究了种植异常的变化(即相对于长期平均水平的种植数量)与两个变量的关系,这两个变量可以解释野猪的压力:一个县拥有野猪的比例和管理强度的趋势,同时考虑了其他可能影响种植决策的变量。我们发现,与野猪范围的重叠越大,棉花的种植异常就越大。然而,清除野猪并不影响任何作物的种植异常。研究还发现,种植异常受投资回报率、气候和保护区土地数量的影响。对于某些作物,这些其他因素比来自野猪的压力更有影响。我们的研究结果表明,生产者正在野猪较多的地区种植更多的棉花,目前减少野猪数量的管理努力并没有改变这些决定。随着野猪在美国的活动范围扩大,生产商转而种植损害较小的作物,这可能会改变未来的作物产量,可能需要更密集的努力来减少野猪的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信