What support is needed for preconception health improvement, and by whom? A qualitative study of women's views

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Michael P. Daly , Ruth R. Kipping , James White , Julia Sanders
{"title":"What support is needed for preconception health improvement, and by whom? A qualitative study of women's views","authors":"Michael P. Daly ,&nbsp;Ruth R. Kipping ,&nbsp;James White ,&nbsp;Julia Sanders","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Systematic reviews suggest preconception health interventions may be effective in improving maternal and infant outcomes<em>.</em> However, few studies have explored women's views on the types of support required for preconception health improvement, nor when and to whom this support should be provided.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We purposively sampled women aged 18–48 years in the West of England from respondents to a survey, and conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews to explore their views on support needs in the preconception period and target populations for this support. We analyzed the data using a data-driven framework analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The women we interviewed (N = 20) broadly supported promoting greater awareness of preconception health and felt the limited focus on health before pregnancy downplays its importance relative to antenatal health. Some women opposed support services and structural interventions to improve preconception health, due to concerns these are less impactful than encouraging individual responsibility for health. Women who supported structural interventions highlighted broader determinants of health and socioeconomic barriers to preconception health improvement. Men were considered a key target population for preconception support, to help share the burden for preconception health improvement. Women broadly supported ‘age-appropriate’, school-based preconception health education, highlighting young women as an under-served group in need of additional preconception education.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings indicate a need to deliver early preventive support ahead of first pregnancy through services, interventions and policies co-produced with women and women's partners. Future research should explore how to increase public understanding of the socioeconomic, environmental and commercial determinants of preconception health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100607"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266732152500085X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Systematic reviews suggest preconception health interventions may be effective in improving maternal and infant outcomes. However, few studies have explored women's views on the types of support required for preconception health improvement, nor when and to whom this support should be provided.

Methods

We purposively sampled women aged 18–48 years in the West of England from respondents to a survey, and conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews to explore their views on support needs in the preconception period and target populations for this support. We analyzed the data using a data-driven framework analysis.

Results

The women we interviewed (N = 20) broadly supported promoting greater awareness of preconception health and felt the limited focus on health before pregnancy downplays its importance relative to antenatal health. Some women opposed support services and structural interventions to improve preconception health, due to concerns these are less impactful than encouraging individual responsibility for health. Women who supported structural interventions highlighted broader determinants of health and socioeconomic barriers to preconception health improvement. Men were considered a key target population for preconception support, to help share the burden for preconception health improvement. Women broadly supported ‘age-appropriate’, school-based preconception health education, highlighting young women as an under-served group in need of additional preconception education.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate a need to deliver early preventive support ahead of first pregnancy through services, interventions and policies co-produced with women and women's partners. Future research should explore how to increase public understanding of the socioeconomic, environmental and commercial determinants of preconception health.
改善孕前健康需要什么样的支持,由谁来支持?对妇女观点的定性研究
背景:系统综述表明,孕前健康干预措施可能对改善孕产妇和婴儿结局有效。然而,很少有研究探讨妇女对改善孕前健康所需的支助类型的看法,也没有探讨应在何时和向谁提供这种支助。方法我们有目的地从英格兰西部18-48岁的女性受访者中抽样调查,并进行半结构化的深度访谈,探讨她们对孕前期支持需求的看法以及这种支持的目标人群。我们使用数据驱动的框架分析来分析数据。结果我们采访的妇女(N = 20)广泛支持提高对孕前健康的认识,并认为对孕前健康的有限关注低估了其相对于产前健康的重要性。一些妇女反对旨在改善孕前健康的支助服务和结构性干预措施,因为她们担心这些措施不如鼓励个人对健康负责有效。支持结构性干预措施的妇女强调了健康的更广泛决定因素和改善孕前健康的社会经济障碍。男性被认为是孕前支助的主要目标人群,以帮助分担改善孕前健康的负担。妇女普遍支持“适龄”的、以学校为基础的孕前健康教育,强调年轻妇女是一个服务不足的群体,需要更多的孕前教育。结论我们的研究结果表明,需要通过与妇女和妇女伴侣共同制定的服务、干预措施和政策,在首次怀孕之前提供早期预防支持。未来的研究应探讨如何提高公众对孕前健康的社会经济、环境和商业决定因素的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信