The impact of retrieval goals on memory for complex events in younger and older adults

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Can Fenerci, Samantha O'Toole, Emma Ranalli, Kailin Summers, Signy Sheldon
{"title":"The impact of retrieval goals on memory for complex events in younger and older adults","authors":"Can Fenerci,&nbsp;Samantha O'Toole,&nbsp;Emma Ranalli,&nbsp;Kailin Summers,&nbsp;Signy Sheldon","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Retrieval goals influence what individuals remember from past experiences. Previous research has demonstrated that adopting accuracy and social goals modify the content of an associated episodic memory. Age-related episodic memory changes coincide with shifts in retrieval goals, leading to questions about how retrieval goals alter memory in the context of aging. To answer these questions, we conducted a between-group experiment in which younger and older participants (<em>N</em> = 120) encoded an audiovisual movie and later recalled it with either an accuracy or social retrieval goal. Following a 24-h delay, participants completed two recognition memory tasks—one assessing memory for narrative (i.e., story structure), another for the perceptual aspects of the movie – and then freely recalled the movie. Using a Natural Language Processing model, we compared the similarity in content between the encoded movie and recollections as well as between the recollections. First, we found higher similarity for participants recalling the movie with an accuracy compared to a social goal, regardless of age group. Second, when comparing the recollections made to a social versus accuracy goal, we found greater similarity across goals for older compared to younger adults. Finally, while younger adults outperformed older adults on both recognition tasks, this effect was stronger for the perceptual than the narrative recognition task. These findings highlight how retrieval goals shape the content of younger and older adults' memories, yet age differences persist as a reduced ability to tune recall to retrieval goals and access precise details from a memory.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 106263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027725002033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrieval goals influence what individuals remember from past experiences. Previous research has demonstrated that adopting accuracy and social goals modify the content of an associated episodic memory. Age-related episodic memory changes coincide with shifts in retrieval goals, leading to questions about how retrieval goals alter memory in the context of aging. To answer these questions, we conducted a between-group experiment in which younger and older participants (N = 120) encoded an audiovisual movie and later recalled it with either an accuracy or social retrieval goal. Following a 24-h delay, participants completed two recognition memory tasks—one assessing memory for narrative (i.e., story structure), another for the perceptual aspects of the movie – and then freely recalled the movie. Using a Natural Language Processing model, we compared the similarity in content between the encoded movie and recollections as well as between the recollections. First, we found higher similarity for participants recalling the movie with an accuracy compared to a social goal, regardless of age group. Second, when comparing the recollections made to a social versus accuracy goal, we found greater similarity across goals for older compared to younger adults. Finally, while younger adults outperformed older adults on both recognition tasks, this effect was stronger for the perceptual than the narrative recognition task. These findings highlight how retrieval goals shape the content of younger and older adults' memories, yet age differences persist as a reduced ability to tune recall to retrieval goals and access precise details from a memory.
检索目标对年轻人和老年人复杂事件记忆的影响
检索目标影响个体对过去经历的记忆。先前的研究表明,采用准确性和社会目标会改变相关情景记忆的内容。与年龄相关的情景记忆变化与检索目标的变化相吻合,这导致了关于检索目标如何在衰老背景下改变记忆的问题。为了回答这些问题,我们进行了一项组间实验,在实验中,年轻和年长的参与者(N = 120)对一段视听电影进行编码,然后以准确性或社会检索目标来回忆它。在24小时的延迟之后,参与者完成了两项识别记忆任务——一项是评估叙事(即故事结构)的记忆,另一项是评估电影的感知方面——然后自由回忆电影。使用自然语言处理模型,我们比较了编码电影和记忆之间以及记忆之间的内容相似性。首先,我们发现,与社会目标相比,无论年龄大小,参与者回忆电影的准确性都有更高的相似性。其次,当比较社会目标和准确性目标的回忆时,我们发现,与年轻人相比,老年人的目标更相似。最后,虽然年轻人在两项识别任务上的表现都优于老年人,但这种效应在知觉识别任务上强于叙事识别任务。这些发现强调了检索目标如何塑造年轻人和老年人的记忆内容,然而,年龄差异仍然存在,因为将回忆调整为检索目标和从记忆中获取精确细节的能力降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信