Lucy van Eck , Shirley Kempeneer , Michael Duijn , Gerard Nijboer
{"title":"The public sector’s new knowledge: Narrating the life of liquid knowledge in public sector innovation labs","authors":"Lucy van Eck , Shirley Kempeneer , Michael Duijn , Gerard Nijboer","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Public sector innovation labs (PSI-labs) are emerging as experimental spaces where governments attempt to generate knowledge for navigating uncertain, technology-driven futures. However, the knowledge they produce often remains “liquid”; relational and difficult to embed in traditional bureaucratic structures. This paper investigates these tensions through an ethnographic study of Vonk, Rotterdam’s digital innovation lab which prepares the municipality for emerging digital technologies in policymaking and service delivery.</div><div>Based on over 200 h of participant observation and 15 interviews, it examines how knowledge is created, shared, and embedded - or fails to be. Employing Hans Christian Andersen’s <em>The Emperor’s New Clothes</em> as a metaphor, the analysis highlights the relational and processual nature of knowledge in PSI-labs.</div><div>The findings reveal that PSI-labs hold potential for future-oriented governance, but face challenges in translating and embedding their \"liquid\" knowledge. We argue that knowledge becomes actionable through enactment within dynamic actor-networks. Knowledge is thus not merely a product of PSI-labs, but a shared accomplishment that materialises in the “doing”. This paper argues for strategic mechanisms to ensure the visibility and usability of such knowledge. By combining ethnographic insights with creative storytelling, it offers fresh perspectives on the governance of public sector innovation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public sector innovation labs (PSI-labs) are emerging as experimental spaces where governments attempt to generate knowledge for navigating uncertain, technology-driven futures. However, the knowledge they produce often remains “liquid”; relational and difficult to embed in traditional bureaucratic structures. This paper investigates these tensions through an ethnographic study of Vonk, Rotterdam’s digital innovation lab which prepares the municipality for emerging digital technologies in policymaking and service delivery.
Based on over 200 h of participant observation and 15 interviews, it examines how knowledge is created, shared, and embedded - or fails to be. Employing Hans Christian Andersen’s The Emperor’s New Clothes as a metaphor, the analysis highlights the relational and processual nature of knowledge in PSI-labs.
The findings reveal that PSI-labs hold potential for future-oriented governance, but face challenges in translating and embedding their "liquid" knowledge. We argue that knowledge becomes actionable through enactment within dynamic actor-networks. Knowledge is thus not merely a product of PSI-labs, but a shared accomplishment that materialises in the “doing”. This paper argues for strategic mechanisms to ensure the visibility and usability of such knowledge. By combining ethnographic insights with creative storytelling, it offers fresh perspectives on the governance of public sector innovation.
期刊介绍:
Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures