Using Machine-Learning to Identify Differences in the Association between Blood-Based Biomarkers and Later Life Health Across Race and Ethnicity.

Mateo P Farina,Eric T Klopack,Eileen M Crimmins
{"title":"Using Machine-Learning to Identify Differences in the Association between Blood-Based Biomarkers and Later Life Health Across Race and Ethnicity.","authors":"Mateo P Farina,Eric T Klopack,Eileen M Crimmins","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasingly, biomarkers are used to understand health and health inequalities among older adults. Combined with advancements in machine-learning approaches, researchers are using predictive algorithms of later life health to identify biomarkers of interest and create biological risk scores. However, these algorithms may select biomarkers that are most important for majority populations, which, in most population-based samples, would reflect the health and aging of White older adults. Understanding how biomarker selection varies across race/ethnicity across different types of health outcomes is paramount to advancing GeroScience research. We used the 2016 Venous Blood Substudy (VBS) of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). We fit race-stratified boosted decision tree models to predict all-cause mortality, multimorbidity, diabetes, and heart conditions from 54 biomarkers in the 2016 VBS that covered 11 biological systems. We, then, graphed biomarkers that had feature values above .01 for each algorithm to show racial/ethnic differences in biomarker selection. We found more variation in biomarker selection across racial/ethnic groups for all-cause mortality. We found little variation in biomarker selection for heart conditions and diabetes. There was some variation for multimorbidity but with substantial overlap across racial/ethnic groups. While machine-learning approaches for developing biological risk scores and identifying biomarkers linked to later life health will yield additional insight into aging processes in human populations, researchers must consider how these approaches may differ across race/ethnicity for different types of health conditions and its potential implications for Geroscience research.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increasingly, biomarkers are used to understand health and health inequalities among older adults. Combined with advancements in machine-learning approaches, researchers are using predictive algorithms of later life health to identify biomarkers of interest and create biological risk scores. However, these algorithms may select biomarkers that are most important for majority populations, which, in most population-based samples, would reflect the health and aging of White older adults. Understanding how biomarker selection varies across race/ethnicity across different types of health outcomes is paramount to advancing GeroScience research. We used the 2016 Venous Blood Substudy (VBS) of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). We fit race-stratified boosted decision tree models to predict all-cause mortality, multimorbidity, diabetes, and heart conditions from 54 biomarkers in the 2016 VBS that covered 11 biological systems. We, then, graphed biomarkers that had feature values above .01 for each algorithm to show racial/ethnic differences in biomarker selection. We found more variation in biomarker selection across racial/ethnic groups for all-cause mortality. We found little variation in biomarker selection for heart conditions and diabetes. There was some variation for multimorbidity but with substantial overlap across racial/ethnic groups. While machine-learning approaches for developing biological risk scores and identifying biomarkers linked to later life health will yield additional insight into aging processes in human populations, researchers must consider how these approaches may differ across race/ethnicity for different types of health conditions and its potential implications for Geroscience research.
使用机器学习来识别基于血液的生物标志物与不同种族和民族的晚年健康之间的关联差异。
越来越多的生物标志物被用于了解老年人的健康和健康不平等。结合机器学习方法的进步,研究人员正在使用晚年健康的预测算法来识别感兴趣的生物标志物并创建生物风险评分。然而,这些算法可能会选择对大多数人群最重要的生物标志物,在大多数基于人群的样本中,这些生物标志物将反映白人老年人的健康和衰老。了解生物标志物选择如何在不同种族/民族和不同类型的健康结果之间变化,对于推进地理科学研究至关重要。我们使用了2016年健康与退休研究(HRS)的静脉血亚研究(VBS)。我们拟合了种族分层的增强决策树模型,以预测2016年VBS中涵盖11个生物系统的54个生物标志物的全因死亡率、多发病、糖尿病和心脏病。然后,我们绘制了每个算法的特征值高于0.01的生物标记物的图表,以显示生物标记物选择中的种族/民族差异。我们发现,在不同种族/民族的全因死亡率中,生物标志物选择的差异更大。我们发现在心脏疾病和糖尿病的生物标志物选择上几乎没有变化。多重发病有一些差异,但在种族/民族群体中有大量重叠。虽然用于开发生物风险评分和识别与晚年健康相关的生物标志物的机器学习方法将对人口老龄化过程产生额外的见解,但研究人员必须考虑这些方法在不同种族/民族中对不同类型的健康状况的差异及其对老年科学研究的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信