DunedinPACE Predicts Incident Metabolic Syndrome: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Data from the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II).

Ilja Demuth,Valentin Max Vetter,Jan Homann,Marit Philine Junge,Vera Regitz-Zagrosek,Denis Gerstorf,Christina M Lill,Lars Bertram
{"title":"DunedinPACE Predicts Incident Metabolic Syndrome: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Data from the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II).","authors":"Ilja Demuth,Valentin Max Vetter,Jan Homann,Marit Philine Junge,Vera Regitz-Zagrosek,Denis Gerstorf,Christina M Lill,Lars Bertram","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAim of the study was a comparative analysis of different epigenetic clocks with regard to their ability to predict a future onset of the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). In addition, cross-sectional relationships between epigenetic age measures and MetS were investigated.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nMetS was diagnosed in participants of the Berlin Aging Study II at baseline (n = 1,671, mean age 68.8 ± 3.7 years, 51.6% women) and at follow-up (n = 1,083; 7.4 ± 1.5 years later). DNA methylation age acceleration (DNAmAA) was calculated for a total of ten epigenetic clocks at baseline. In addition, DunedinPACE, a DNAm-based measure of the pace of aging, was calculated. The relationship between MetS, DNAmAA and DunedinPACE was investigated by fitting regression models adjusted for potential confounders and calculating receiver operating characteristic statistics.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAmong all biomarkers investigated, DunedinPACE was the only DNAm-based predictor that was significantly associated with incident MetS at follow-up on average 7.4 years later (OR: 9.84, p = 0.028). Logistic regression models predicting MetS that either included solely clinical parameters or solely epigenetic clock estimates (DNAmAA) or DunedinPACE revealed that GrimAge DNAmAA had an area under the curve most comparable to the model considering clinical variables only. Cross-sectional differences between participants with and without MetS remained statistically significant for DunedinPACE only after covariate adjustment (baseline: β = 0.042, follow-up: β = 0.031, p < 0.0001 in both cases).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nComparison of epigenetic clocks in relation to MetS showed strong and consistent associations with DunedinPACE. Our results highlight the potential of using certain DNAm-based measures of biological ageing in predicting the onset of clinical outcomes, such as MetS.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Aim of the study was a comparative analysis of different epigenetic clocks with regard to their ability to predict a future onset of the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). In addition, cross-sectional relationships between epigenetic age measures and MetS were investigated. METHODS MetS was diagnosed in participants of the Berlin Aging Study II at baseline (n = 1,671, mean age 68.8 ± 3.7 years, 51.6% women) and at follow-up (n = 1,083; 7.4 ± 1.5 years later). DNA methylation age acceleration (DNAmAA) was calculated for a total of ten epigenetic clocks at baseline. In addition, DunedinPACE, a DNAm-based measure of the pace of aging, was calculated. The relationship between MetS, DNAmAA and DunedinPACE was investigated by fitting regression models adjusted for potential confounders and calculating receiver operating characteristic statistics. RESULTS Among all biomarkers investigated, DunedinPACE was the only DNAm-based predictor that was significantly associated with incident MetS at follow-up on average 7.4 years later (OR: 9.84, p = 0.028). Logistic regression models predicting MetS that either included solely clinical parameters or solely epigenetic clock estimates (DNAmAA) or DunedinPACE revealed that GrimAge DNAmAA had an area under the curve most comparable to the model considering clinical variables only. Cross-sectional differences between participants with and without MetS remained statistically significant for DunedinPACE only after covariate adjustment (baseline: β = 0.042, follow-up: β = 0.031, p < 0.0001 in both cases). CONCLUSION Comparison of epigenetic clocks in relation to MetS showed strong and consistent associations with DunedinPACE. Our results highlight the potential of using certain DNAm-based measures of biological ageing in predicting the onset of clinical outcomes, such as MetS.
DunedinPACE预测代谢综合征:来自柏林老龄化研究II (BASE-II)的横断面和纵向数据。
本研究的目的是比较分析不同的表观遗传时钟在预测代谢综合征(MetS)未来发病方面的能力。此外,研究了表观遗传年龄测量与MetS之间的横断面关系。方法柏林老龄化研究II的参与者在基线时(n = 1,671,平均年龄68.8±3.7岁,51.6%为女性)和随访时(n = 1,083;7.4±1.5年)。DNA甲基化年龄加速(DNAmAA)在基线上计算了总共10个表观遗传时钟。此外,还计算了DunedinPACE,一种基于dna的衰老速度测量方法。通过拟合校正潜在混杂因素的回归模型和计算受试者工作特征统计量,研究MetS、DNAmAA和DunedinPACE之间的关系。结果在所有被调查的生物标志物中,DunedinPACE是唯一基于dnam的预测因子,与平均7.4年后随访时发生的MetS事件显著相关(OR: 9.84, p = 0.028)。预测met的逻辑回归模型要么只包括临床参数,要么只包括表观遗传时钟估计(DNAmAA)或DunedinPACE,结果显示GrimAge DNAmAA的曲线下面积与只考虑临床变量的模型最具可比性。仅在协变量调整后,患有和未患有MetS的受试者之间的横断面差异在DunedinPACE中仍具有统计学意义(基线:β = 0.042,随访:β = 0.031,两种情况下p < 0.0001)。结论与MetS相关的表观遗传时钟的比较显示,DunedinPACE与MetS具有强烈而一致的相关性。我们的研究结果强调了使用某些基于dna的生物衰老测量方法来预测临床结果(如MetS)开始的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信