Trend analysis of adverse drug reactions to sedative-hypnotics among residents in Jiangsu Province of China, 2011-2019.

Jinxia Yu, Ming Li, Hui Xue, Yitao Liu, Lijun Fan, Jianjun Zou, Wei Du
{"title":"Trend analysis of adverse drug reactions to sedative-hypnotics among residents in Jiangsu Province of China, 2011-2019.","authors":"Jinxia Yu, Ming Li, Hui Xue, Yitao Liu, Lijun Fan, Jianjun Zou, Wei Du","doi":"10.1177/09246479251360682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe safety of sedative-hypnotic drugs represents an underrecognized and crucial public health concern, despite their widespread use.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics and trends of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to sedative-hypnotics in China.MethodData were extracted from the spontaneous reporting system (SRS) for ADR surveillance in Jiangsu Province. Sedative-hypnotic drugs for ADRs were coded using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. We used the Chinese modification of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, to group primary diseases, and the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities to classify the manifestation of ADRs. We analysed the characteristics of ADR reports, including demographic and sedative-hypnotics information, ADR involvement of system organs and clinical manifestations, and cost of ADRs. Joinpoint regression was employed to estimate age-adjusted ADR rates stratified by sex from 2011 to 2019, and the percentage change annualized estimator was used to evaluate trends over time.ResultsA total of 899 reports of ADRs to sedative-hypnotics were found, with 440 (49.1%) males and 459 (50.9%) females. Regarding ADRs to sedative-hypnotics, neurological disorders (310 cases, 34.5%) were the most common. An estimated cost savings of RMB 6031.98-54,287.82 (USD 826.38-7437.43) could be realised if 10%-90% of the ADRs in this study were reduced. The age-adjusted ADRs reporting rates increased significantly from 0.06 to 0.18 per 100,000 population during 2011-2019, representing an annual increase of 14.5% (95% confidence interval 9.4-19.9%; <i>p</i>-value < 0.001). There was a gender difference, with an age-adjusted ADRs annual increase of 14.0% (95% confidence interval 6.6%-21.9%; <i>p</i>-value 0.002) for males and 14.8% (95% confidence interval 7.5%-22.6%; <i>p</i>-value 0.002) for females.ConclusionsReports of sedative-hypnotic ADRs were on the rise during the study period, and there was a gender difference. More rational policies and systems are needed to promote the safe use of sedative-hypnotic drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520800,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"9246479251360682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479251360682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe safety of sedative-hypnotic drugs represents an underrecognized and crucial public health concern, despite their widespread use.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics and trends of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to sedative-hypnotics in China.MethodData were extracted from the spontaneous reporting system (SRS) for ADR surveillance in Jiangsu Province. Sedative-hypnotic drugs for ADRs were coded using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. We used the Chinese modification of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, to group primary diseases, and the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities to classify the manifestation of ADRs. We analysed the characteristics of ADR reports, including demographic and sedative-hypnotics information, ADR involvement of system organs and clinical manifestations, and cost of ADRs. Joinpoint regression was employed to estimate age-adjusted ADR rates stratified by sex from 2011 to 2019, and the percentage change annualized estimator was used to evaluate trends over time.ResultsA total of 899 reports of ADRs to sedative-hypnotics were found, with 440 (49.1%) males and 459 (50.9%) females. Regarding ADRs to sedative-hypnotics, neurological disorders (310 cases, 34.5%) were the most common. An estimated cost savings of RMB 6031.98-54,287.82 (USD 826.38-7437.43) could be realised if 10%-90% of the ADRs in this study were reduced. The age-adjusted ADRs reporting rates increased significantly from 0.06 to 0.18 per 100,000 population during 2011-2019, representing an annual increase of 14.5% (95% confidence interval 9.4-19.9%; p-value < 0.001). There was a gender difference, with an age-adjusted ADRs annual increase of 14.0% (95% confidence interval 6.6%-21.9%; p-value 0.002) for males and 14.8% (95% confidence interval 7.5%-22.6%; p-value 0.002) for females.ConclusionsReports of sedative-hypnotic ADRs were on the rise during the study period, and there was a gender difference. More rational policies and systems are needed to promote the safe use of sedative-hypnotic drugs.

2011-2019年江苏省居民镇静催眠药物不良反应趋势分析
背景镇静催眠药物的安全性是一个未被充分认识的重要公共卫生问题,尽管它们被广泛使用。目的了解镇静催眠药在中国的不良反应特点及趋势。方法从江苏省药品不良反应监测自发报告系统(SRS)中提取数据。使用解剖治疗化学分类系统对adr镇静催眠药物进行编码。我们使用《国际疾病分类第十版》中文修订本对原发疾病进行分组,并使用《药物调节活动医学词典》对adr的表现进行分类。我们分析了ADR报告的特点,包括人口统计学和镇静催眠药物信息、ADR累及系统器官和临床表现、ADR费用。采用联合点回归估计2011年至2019年按性别分层的年龄调整不良反应发生率,并使用百分比变化年化估计器评估随时间变化的趋势。结果共发现镇静催眠药物不良反应报告899例,其中男性440例(49.1%),女性459例(50.9%)。镇静催眠药物不良反应以神经系统疾病(310例,34.5%)最为常见。如果在本研究中减少10%-90%的adr,预计可节省6031.98-54,287.82元人民币(826.38-7437.43美元)的成本。2011-2019年期间,年龄调整后的adr报告率从每10万人0.06例显著上升至0.18例,年均增长14.5%(95%置信区间9.4-19.9%;p值< 0.001)。存在性别差异,年龄调整后的adr年增长率为14.0%(95%可信区间6.6%-21.9%;p值为0.002),男性为14.8%(95%置信区间为7.5%-22.6%;p值为0.002)。结论研究期间镇静催眠药物不良反应报告呈上升趋势,且存在性别差异。需要更合理的政策和制度来促进镇静催眠药物的安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信