Initial Evaluation of a New Auditory Attention Task for Assessing Alerting, Orienting, and Executive Control Attention.

Arianna N LaCroix, Emily Sebranek
{"title":"Initial Evaluation of a New Auditory Attention Task for Assessing Alerting, Orienting, and Executive Control Attention.","authors":"Arianna N LaCroix, Emily Sebranek","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Attention is a key cognitive function crucial for selecting and processing information. It is often divided into three components: alerting, orienting, and executive control. While there are tasks designed to simultaneously assess the attentional subsystems in the visual modality, creating an effective auditory task has been challenging, especially for clinical populations. This study aimed to explore whether a new Auditory Attention Task (AAT) measures all three attentional subsystems in neurotypical controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Forty-eight young adults completed the AAT, where they judged the duration of the first of two tones while ignoring the second tone's duration. Executive control was assessed by comparing performance on trials with conflict (incongruent) and without conflict (congruent). The tones could also differ on frequency and performance differences between trials with same versus different frequencies measured orienting attention. A warning cue was presented before the first pure tone on half of the trials. Alerting attention was measured by comparing performance on trials with and without a warning cue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AAT measured alerting, orienting, and executive control attention as expected. Participants were faster on warned than nonwarned trials (alerting) and on same- versus different-frequency trials (orienting). Participants were also faster and more accurate on same- versus different-duration trials (executive control). We also observed several interactions between the attentional subsystems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate that the AAT measured alerting, orienting, and executive control attention. However, additional work is needed to explore the AAT's utility in clinical populations, such as people with aphasia.</p><p><strong>Supplemental material: </strong>https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29525717.</p>","PeriodicalId":520690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Attention is a key cognitive function crucial for selecting and processing information. It is often divided into three components: alerting, orienting, and executive control. While there are tasks designed to simultaneously assess the attentional subsystems in the visual modality, creating an effective auditory task has been challenging, especially for clinical populations. This study aimed to explore whether a new Auditory Attention Task (AAT) measures all three attentional subsystems in neurotypical controls.

Method: Forty-eight young adults completed the AAT, where they judged the duration of the first of two tones while ignoring the second tone's duration. Executive control was assessed by comparing performance on trials with conflict (incongruent) and without conflict (congruent). The tones could also differ on frequency and performance differences between trials with same versus different frequencies measured orienting attention. A warning cue was presented before the first pure tone on half of the trials. Alerting attention was measured by comparing performance on trials with and without a warning cue.

Results: The AAT measured alerting, orienting, and executive control attention as expected. Participants were faster on warned than nonwarned trials (alerting) and on same- versus different-frequency trials (orienting). Participants were also faster and more accurate on same- versus different-duration trials (executive control). We also observed several interactions between the attentional subsystems.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the AAT measured alerting, orienting, and executive control attention. However, additional work is needed to explore the AAT's utility in clinical populations, such as people with aphasia.

Supplemental material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29525717.

评估警报、定向和执行控制注意的新听觉注意任务的初步评估。
目的:注意是一种重要的认知功能,对信息的选择和加工至关重要。它通常分为三个部分:警报、定向和执行控制。虽然有任务旨在同时评估视觉模式中的注意子系统,但创建有效的听觉任务一直具有挑战性,特别是对于临床人群。本研究旨在探讨一个新的听觉注意任务(AAT)是否能测量神经正常对照的所有三个注意子系统。方法:48名年轻人完成了AAT测试,在测试中,他们判断两个音调中的第一个音调的持续时间,而忽略第二个音调的持续时间。通过比较冲突(不一致)和无冲突(一致)试验的表现来评估执行控制。音调的频率也可能不同,在相同频率和不同频率的实验中,音调的表现差异也可能不同。在一半的实验中,在第一个纯音之前有一个警告提示。通过比较在有警告提示和没有警告提示的情况下的表现来衡量注意力。结果:AAT测量了警觉性、定向性和执行控制注意力。参与者在警告试验中比非警告试验(警告)更快,在相同频率试验与不同频率试验(定向)中更快。参与者在相同和不同持续时间的试验中也更快更准确(执行控制)。我们还观察到注意子系统之间的一些相互作用。结论:我们的研究结果表明,AAT测量警报、定向和执行控制注意。然而,还需要进一步的工作来探索AAT在临床人群中的应用,比如失语症患者。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.29525717。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信