Liberals and conservatives respond divergently to stereotype portrayals of race and gender.

Elizabeth Q Jiang, Margaret J Shih
{"title":"Liberals and conservatives respond divergently to stereotype portrayals of race and gender.","authors":"Elizabeth Q Jiang, Margaret J Shih","doi":"10.1038/s44271-025-00287-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Representation in the media has become a polarizing issue dividing conservatives and liberals in the U.S. In four experiments (N = 5125), we find that stereotype portrayal elicits divergent attitudinal, economic, and behavioral reactions from liberals and conservatives. Notably, these reactions differ when portrayals feature racial minority (Study 1, n = 958 & Study 2, n = 900) versus white models (Study 3, n = 783 & Study 4, n = 2484). Our findings demonstrate consistent divergence in responses to stereotype congruent versus incongruent portrayals between liberals and conservatives, although the direction and magnitude of differences vary. Liberals and conservatives display both variability and consistency in their divergent evaluations: liberals endorse portrayals of minority races and of incongruency but withhold this endorsement for solely white models, whereas conservatives typically prefer congruent portrayals, but show an openness towards incongruency when white models are featured. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for navigating the current sociopolitical landscape, especially in contexts where representations of race and gender identities are contentious.</p>","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":"3 1","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00287-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Representation in the media has become a polarizing issue dividing conservatives and liberals in the U.S. In four experiments (N = 5125), we find that stereotype portrayal elicits divergent attitudinal, economic, and behavioral reactions from liberals and conservatives. Notably, these reactions differ when portrayals feature racial minority (Study 1, n = 958 & Study 2, n = 900) versus white models (Study 3, n = 783 & Study 4, n = 2484). Our findings demonstrate consistent divergence in responses to stereotype congruent versus incongruent portrayals between liberals and conservatives, although the direction and magnitude of differences vary. Liberals and conservatives display both variability and consistency in their divergent evaluations: liberals endorse portrayals of minority races and of incongruency but withhold this endorsement for solely white models, whereas conservatives typically prefer congruent portrayals, but show an openness towards incongruency when white models are featured. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for navigating the current sociopolitical landscape, especially in contexts where representations of race and gender identities are contentious.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自由派和保守派对种族和性别的刻板印象反应不一。
在四个实验中(N = 5125),我们发现刻板印象的描绘引起了自由派和保守派在态度、经济和行为上的不同反应。值得注意的是,当描绘的是少数族裔(研究1,n = 958;研究2,n = 900)和白人模特(研究3,n = 783;研究4,n = 2484)时,这些反应是不同的。我们的研究结果表明,自由主义者和保守主义者对刻板印象一致和不一致的反应存在一致的差异,尽管差异的方向和幅度有所不同。自由主义者和保守主义者在他们不同的评价中既表现出可变性,又表现出一致性:自由主义者支持少数民族和不一致的描绘,但对纯白人模特不认可,而保守主义者通常更喜欢一致的描绘,但当白人模特出现时,他们对不一致的描绘持开放态度。了解这些动态对于驾驭当前的社会政治格局至关重要,特别是在种族和性别身份的表现存在争议的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信