Association of Perirectal Hydrogel Spacer Placement with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jong Kyou Kwon, Jinhyung Jeon, Sungun Bang, Kyo Chul Koo, Kang Su Cho, Do Kyung Kim
{"title":"Association of Perirectal Hydrogel Spacer Placement with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jong Kyou Kwon, Jinhyung Jeon, Sungun Bang, Kyo Chul Koo, Kang Su Cho, Do Kyung Kim","doi":"10.5534/wjmh.250043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the relationship between perirectal hydrogel spacer placement and the clinical outcomes in men undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An extensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, encompassing studies published through June 2024. Group comparisons were performed using the weighted mean difference for continuous variables and the risk ratio for dichotomous measures. The primary endpoint was to compare rectal radiation doses with or without a perirectal spacer. Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities (acute/late and any/grade ≥2, with subgroup analyses for hypofractionated RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 35 studies comprising 4,664 males. Rectal spacers effectively reduced the mean and maximum rectal radiation exposure, with reductions of 51.8% in V50 (mL) and 56.8% in V70 (mL). Furthermore, the percentage-based analysis showed reductions of 54.5% in V50 (%) and 62.2% in V70 (%). Acute GU toxicities (any grade and grade ≥2) showed no significant difference between the spacer and no-spacer groups, with no subgroup differences by fractionation. Late GU toxicities (any grade) were lower in the spacer group, while grade ≥2 toxicities showed no difference. Acute GI toxicities (any grade) were significantly reduced with spacers, particularly in hypofractionated RT, while grade ≥2 toxicities showed no difference. Late GI toxicities (any grade) were lower in the spacer group, with a stronger protective effect in hypofractionated RT. No significant difference was observed in grade ≥2 late GI toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hydrogel spacers significantly reduced rectal radiation exposure and overall GI toxicity. However, their limited impact on severe toxicity highlights the need for further research on high-risk treatments and advanced RT techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":54261,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Mens Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.250043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the relationship between perirectal hydrogel spacer placement and the clinical outcomes in men undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer.
Materials and methods: An extensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, encompassing studies published through June 2024. Group comparisons were performed using the weighted mean difference for continuous variables and the risk ratio for dichotomous measures. The primary endpoint was to compare rectal radiation doses with or without a perirectal spacer. Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities (acute/late and any/grade ≥2, with subgroup analyses for hypofractionated RT.
Results: We reviewed 35 studies comprising 4,664 males. Rectal spacers effectively reduced the mean and maximum rectal radiation exposure, with reductions of 51.8% in V50 (mL) and 56.8% in V70 (mL). Furthermore, the percentage-based analysis showed reductions of 54.5% in V50 (%) and 62.2% in V70 (%). Acute GU toxicities (any grade and grade ≥2) showed no significant difference between the spacer and no-spacer groups, with no subgroup differences by fractionation. Late GU toxicities (any grade) were lower in the spacer group, while grade ≥2 toxicities showed no difference. Acute GI toxicities (any grade) were significantly reduced with spacers, particularly in hypofractionated RT, while grade ≥2 toxicities showed no difference. Late GI toxicities (any grade) were lower in the spacer group, with a stronger protective effect in hypofractionated RT. No significant difference was observed in grade ≥2 late GI toxicities.
Conclusions: Hydrogel spacers significantly reduced rectal radiation exposure and overall GI toxicity. However, their limited impact on severe toxicity highlights the need for further research on high-risk treatments and advanced RT techniques.
目的:探讨直肠周围水凝胶间隔剂放置与前列腺癌放疗(RT)患者临床预后的关系。材料和方法:使用PubMed/Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science数据库进行了广泛的文献综述,包括截至2024年6月发表的研究。使用连续变量的加权平均差和二分类测量的风险比进行组间比较。主要终点是比较有或没有直肠周围间隔器的直肠辐射剂量。次要结局包括胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性(急性/晚期和任何/分级≥2),并对低分级rt进行亚组分析。结果:我们回顾了35项研究,包括4,664名男性。直肠间隔剂有效降低直肠辐射暴露的平均和最大,V50 (mL)降低51.8%,V70 (mL)降低56.8%。此外,基于百分比的分析显示V50(%)降低54.5%,V70(%)降低62.2%。急性GU毒性(任何级别和≥2级)在间隔剂组和非间隔剂组之间无显著差异,亚组间无分级差异。间隔组的晚期GU毒性(任何级别)均较低,而≥2级的毒性无差异。急性胃肠道毒性(任何级别)与间隔剂显著降低,特别是在低分割RT中,而≥2级的毒性没有差异。间隔剂组的晚期胃肠道毒性(任何级别)均较低,在低分割rt中具有更强的保护作用。在≥2级的晚期胃肠道毒性中未观察到显著差异。结论:水凝胶间隔剂显著降低直肠辐射暴露和整体胃肠道毒性。然而,它们对严重毒性的影响有限,因此需要进一步研究高风险治疗和先进的放射治疗技术。