A "Bare Hope of A Result": The Second CRISPR Patent Appeal.

IF 3.7 4区 生物学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jacob S Sherkow
{"title":"A \"Bare Hope of A Result\": The Second CRISPR Patent Appeal.","authors":"Jacob S Sherkow","doi":"10.1177/25731599251361362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On May 12, 2025, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its second decision in the long-running CRISPR patent dispute between the Regents of the University of California and related institutions (CVC) and the Broad Institute. This Perspective recounts the principal dispute to date, reviews the Federal Circuit's recent opinion, and provides a critique of its analysis. In particular, this Perspective highlights how the decision is self-contradictory and in tension with patent law's conception doctrine-when an inventor has formed a \"definite and permanent\" idea of an invention in the mind or whether the invention was little more than a \"bare hope\" of a result. This Perspective briefly concludes with the implications of this recent decision and where the underlying dispute is likely headed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54232,"journal":{"name":"CRISPR Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRISPR Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25731599251361362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On May 12, 2025, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its second decision in the long-running CRISPR patent dispute between the Regents of the University of California and related institutions (CVC) and the Broad Institute. This Perspective recounts the principal dispute to date, reviews the Federal Circuit's recent opinion, and provides a critique of its analysis. In particular, this Perspective highlights how the decision is self-contradictory and in tension with patent law's conception doctrine-when an inventor has formed a "definite and permanent" idea of an invention in the mind or whether the invention was little more than a "bare hope" of a result. This Perspective briefly concludes with the implications of this recent decision and where the underlying dispute is likely headed.

“结果的一线希望”:第二次CRISPR专利上诉。
2025年5月12日,美国联邦巡回上诉法院就加州大学及相关机构(CVC)与布罗德研究所(Broad Institute)之间旷日持久的CRISPR专利纠纷发布了第二项裁决。本文回顾了迄今为止的主要争议,回顾了联邦巡回法院最近的意见,并对其分析提出了批评。特别地,这一观点强调了这一决定是如何自相矛盾的,并且与专利法的概念原则相矛盾——当发明人在头脑中形成了对一项发明的“明确和永久”的想法,或者这项发明是否仅仅是对结果的“纯粹的希望”。本展望简要总结了最近这一决定的含义,以及潜在的争端可能走向何方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CRISPR Journal
CRISPR Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: In recognition of this extraordinary scientific and technological era, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers recently announced the creation of The CRISPR Journal -- an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal publishing outstanding research on the myriad applications and underlying technology of CRISPR. Debuting in 2018, The CRISPR Journal will be published online and in print with flexible open access options, providing a high-profile venue for groundbreaking research, as well as lively and provocative commentary, analysis, and debate. The CRISPR Journal adds an exciting and dynamic component to the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. portfolio, which includes GEN (Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News) and more than 80 leading peer-reviewed journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信