Nursing undergraduates' use, readiness, barriers, and perceived effectiveness of online distance learning during COVID-19 in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Prasanthi Sumudrika Ilankoon Ilankoon Mudiyanselage, Kedhara Sujatha Seneviratne Seneviratne Mudiyanselage
{"title":"Nursing undergraduates' use, readiness, barriers, and perceived effectiveness of online distance learning during COVID-19 in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Prasanthi Sumudrika Ilankoon Ilankoon Mudiyanselage, Kedhara Sujatha Seneviratne Seneviratne Mudiyanselage","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-03583-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional learning, presenting unique challenges for nursing undergraduates due to the hands-on nature of their education. Assessing students' readiness, usage of online platforms, and the barriers they face is crucial to evaluating the effectiveness and sustainability of online learning. This study aimed to investigate nursing undergraduates' use of online learning facilities, readiness for online distance learning, and associated factors; to identify the barriers and challenges they faced; and to explore their perceived effectiveness with online distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 137 nursing undergraduates in Sri Lanka. Data were collected using a pretested, validated study instrument, including students' Online Learning Readiness Score (OLRS) distributed through Google Forms. The data were then analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study had a 91.3% response rate (n = 137), with a mean participant age of 24.18 (± 3.45) years. Nearly half (51.8%) accessed online classes via smartphones, and most (62.8%) used mobile data. Key challenges included mobility restrictions (85.4%), lack of face-to-face interaction (82.5%), heavy workloads (81%), household duties (79.6%), and poor internet connectivity (78.8%). The mean Online Learning Readiness Score (OLRS) was 13.95 (± 4.90), with higher scores in self-directed learning and motivation (3.44-3.63). MANOVA revealed a significant gender difference in OLRS (F = 3.932, p < 0.04; Wilks' Lambda = 0.955; η² = 0.028), and significant differences in computer internet self-efficacy across academic years (F = 6.015, p < 0.001; Wilks' Lambda = 0.808; η² = 0.119).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nursing undergraduates faced several challenges to online learning during COVID-19, including mobility restrictions, low motivation, and poor connectivity. Despite moderate self-directed learning and motivation, overall readiness was low. Readiness varied by gender and academic year, indicating the need for targeted support to improve digital preparedness and engagement.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03583-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional learning, presenting unique challenges for nursing undergraduates due to the hands-on nature of their education. Assessing students' readiness, usage of online platforms, and the barriers they face is crucial to evaluating the effectiveness and sustainability of online learning. This study aimed to investigate nursing undergraduates' use of online learning facilities, readiness for online distance learning, and associated factors; to identify the barriers and challenges they faced; and to explore their perceived effectiveness with online distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 137 nursing undergraduates in Sri Lanka. Data were collected using a pretested, validated study instrument, including students' Online Learning Readiness Score (OLRS) distributed through Google Forms. The data were then analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate analysis of variance.

Results: The study had a 91.3% response rate (n = 137), with a mean participant age of 24.18 (± 3.45) years. Nearly half (51.8%) accessed online classes via smartphones, and most (62.8%) used mobile data. Key challenges included mobility restrictions (85.4%), lack of face-to-face interaction (82.5%), heavy workloads (81%), household duties (79.6%), and poor internet connectivity (78.8%). The mean Online Learning Readiness Score (OLRS) was 13.95 (± 4.90), with higher scores in self-directed learning and motivation (3.44-3.63). MANOVA revealed a significant gender difference in OLRS (F = 3.932, p < 0.04; Wilks' Lambda = 0.955; η² = 0.028), and significant differences in computer internet self-efficacy across academic years (F = 6.015, p < 0.001; Wilks' Lambda = 0.808; η² = 0.119).

Conclusion: Nursing undergraduates faced several challenges to online learning during COVID-19, including mobility restrictions, low motivation, and poor connectivity. Despite moderate self-directed learning and motivation, overall readiness was low. Readiness varied by gender and academic year, indicating the need for targeted support to improve digital preparedness and engagement.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

斯里兰卡护理本科生在COVID-19期间在线远程学习的使用、准备、障碍和感知有效性:一项横断面研究
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行扰乱了传统学习,由于护理本科生的教育是实践性的,这给他们带来了独特的挑战。评估学生的准备情况、在线平台的使用情况以及他们面临的障碍对于评估在线学习的有效性和可持续性至关重要。本研究旨在调查护理本科生在线学习设备的使用情况、在线远程学习的准备情况及其相关因素;确定他们面临的障碍和挑战;并探讨他们在COVID-19大流行期间在线远程学习的感知效果。方法:对斯里兰卡137名护理本科生进行描述性横断面研究。数据收集使用预先测试,验证的学习工具,包括通过谷歌表格分发的学生在线学习准备评分(OLRS)。然后使用描述性统计和多变量方差分析对数据进行分析。结果:该研究有效率为91.3% (n = 137),参与者平均年龄为24.18(±3.45)岁。近一半(51.8%)的学生通过智能手机访问在线课程,大多数(62.8%)使用移动数据。主要挑战包括行动受限(85.4%)、缺乏面对面互动(82.5%)、工作量大(81%)、家务(79.6%)和互联网连接差(78.8%)。在线学习准备得分(OLRS)平均为13.95(±4.90)分,自主学习和动机得分较高(3.44-3.63)。结论:2019冠状病毒病疫情期间,护理本科生在线学习面临诸多挑战,包括行动受限、学习动机低、连通性差。尽管有适度的自主学习和动机,但总体准备程度很低。准备程度因性别和学年而异,这表明需要有针对性的支持,以改善数字准备和参与。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信