Behavioural insights in the underuse of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure: a pilot survey on incentive perceptions among referring cardiologists.

IF 3.3 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Joan Costa-I-Font, Georgiana Miler-Raicu, Elena Arbelo, Ruben Casado-Arroyo, Aya Sami, Eric Wei Seong Tee, Joseph Hazel, Laurent Roten, Tobias Reichlin, Haran Burri, Khaled Albouaini, Nikola Kozhuharov
{"title":"Behavioural insights in the underuse of cardiac resynchronisation therapy in heart failure: a pilot survey on incentive perceptions among referring cardiologists.","authors":"Joan Costa-I-Font, Georgiana Miler-Raicu, Elena Arbelo, Ruben Casado-Arroyo, Aya Sami, Eric Wei Seong Tee, Joseph Hazel, Laurent Roten, Tobias Reichlin, Haran Burri, Khaled Albouaini, Nikola Kozhuharov","doi":"10.1186/s13561-025-00657-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalisation in patients over 50, significantly impacting both quality of life and survival. Despite the well-established benefits of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT), its utilisation in clinical practice remains suboptimal. Traditional incentives, have shown limited effectiveness in increasing CRT referrals. This manuscript explores how behavioural economics can offer a novel framework for improving CRT uptake by leveraging behavioural incentives, particularly choice architecture and social incentives, to influence physician referral patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We underscore key concepts of behavioural economics, including choice architecture (nudges, reference points, sludges), cognitive biases (status quo bias, overconfidence bias, availability bias), and social incentives, which are applied in designing incentives to promote CRT referrals. A survey was conducted with 51 physicians from six European countries, including electrophysiologists, heart failure specialists, and general cardiologists, recruited through cardiology networks and personal contacts. Participants rated their perceptions of five incentive strategies using a Likert scale (1-5). Behavioural incentives, such as peer comparison through league tables (social incentive) and decision prompts in electronic health records (choice architecture nudge), were perceived as more effective than traditional financial incentives, with a median Likert score of 4.0 [IQR 3.0-5.0] versus 2.5 [IQR 1.5-3.0] for traditional incentives (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that interventions drawing on behavioural economics, particularly those utilising social incentives and choice architecture redesign, may offer more effective to increasing CRT referrals than traditional incentives. Such interventions could enhance CRT uptake and outcomes for heart failure patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"15 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-025-00657-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalisation in patients over 50, significantly impacting both quality of life and survival. Despite the well-established benefits of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT), its utilisation in clinical practice remains suboptimal. Traditional incentives, have shown limited effectiveness in increasing CRT referrals. This manuscript explores how behavioural economics can offer a novel framework for improving CRT uptake by leveraging behavioural incentives, particularly choice architecture and social incentives, to influence physician referral patterns.

Methods and results: We underscore key concepts of behavioural economics, including choice architecture (nudges, reference points, sludges), cognitive biases (status quo bias, overconfidence bias, availability bias), and social incentives, which are applied in designing incentives to promote CRT referrals. A survey was conducted with 51 physicians from six European countries, including electrophysiologists, heart failure specialists, and general cardiologists, recruited through cardiology networks and personal contacts. Participants rated their perceptions of five incentive strategies using a Likert scale (1-5). Behavioural incentives, such as peer comparison through league tables (social incentive) and decision prompts in electronic health records (choice architecture nudge), were perceived as more effective than traditional financial incentives, with a median Likert score of 4.0 [IQR 3.0-5.0] versus 2.5 [IQR 1.5-3.0] for traditional incentives (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that interventions drawing on behavioural economics, particularly those utilising social incentives and choice architecture redesign, may offer more effective to increasing CRT referrals than traditional incentives. Such interventions could enhance CRT uptake and outcomes for heart failure patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

心脏再同步治疗在心力衰竭中使用不足的行为洞察:对转诊心脏病专家的激励观念的试点调查。
目的:心力衰竭是50岁以上患者住院的主要原因,严重影响生活质量和生存率。尽管心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的益处已得到公认,但其在临床实践中的应用仍不理想。传统的激励措施在增加CRT转诊方面效果有限。本文探讨了行为经济学如何通过利用行为激励,特别是选择架构和社会激励,来影响医生转诊模式,从而为提高CRT的吸收提供一个新的框架。方法和结果:我们强调了行为经济学的关键概念,包括选择架构(轻推、参考点、污泥)、认知偏差(现状偏差、过度自信偏差、可得性偏差)和社会激励,这些概念应用于设计促进CRT转诊的激励措施。研究人员对来自6个欧洲国家的51名医生进行了调查,包括电生理学家、心力衰竭专家和普通心脏病专家,他们是通过心脏病学网络和个人联系招募的。参与者用李克特量表(1-5)评价他们对五种激励策略的看法。行为激励,如通过排名表进行同伴比较(社会激励)和电子健康记录中的决策提示(选择架构推动),被认为比传统的财务激励更有效,传统激励的中位数李克特得分为4.0 [IQR 3.0-5.0],而传统激励的中位数李克特得分为2.5 [IQR 1.5-3.0] (p结论:这些发现表明,利用行为经济学的干预措施,特别是那些利用社会激励和重新设计选择架构的干预措施,可能比传统的激励措施更有效地增加CRT转诊。这些干预措施可以提高心力衰竭患者CRT的吸收和预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信