[Trajectory of intrinsic capacity and association with daily life ability in people aged 50 years and over in Shanghai].

Q1 Medicine
J Q Wang, Y F Guo, Y Shi, S Y Sun, J M Cao, A L Jiang, Y J Dong, Y Ruan, F Wu
{"title":"[Trajectory of intrinsic capacity and association with daily life ability in people aged 50 years and over in Shanghai].","authors":"J Q Wang, Y F Guo, Y Shi, S Y Sun, J M Cao, A L Jiang, Y J Dong, Y Ruan, F Wu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20241115-00728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To identify the change trajectory of intrinsic capacity in people aged ≥50 years in Shanghai and explore the impact of intrinsic capacity trajectory change on overall function and dalily life activities in this population. <b>Methods:</b> The longitudinal data from round 1 to 3 Study of Global Ageing and Adult Health in Shanghai were used. The total intrinsic ability scores from five dimensions of cognition, psychology, sensory, vitality and locomotion were calculated. The censored normal model of group-based trajectory was used to identify the trajectory of intrinsic capacity change over time. Linear regression model and multivariate logistic regression model were used to analyse the effects of different levels intrinsic capacity trajectory on the scores of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), the activity of daily living (ADL) and the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). <b>Results:</b> A total of 2 302 study participants aged ≥50 years with 3 round complete data were included in this study, and 3 levels of intrinsic capacity trajectory were identified, low-level trajectory (9.3%), medium-level trajectory (41.7%), and high-level trajectory (49.0%). Compared with the high-level group, the medium-level and low-level groups had higher WHODAS scores, which increased by 3.578 (95%<i>CI</i>: 2.028-5.129) and 12.620 (95%<i>CI</i>: 9.951-15.289), respectively, and those with more severe disability and those in the low-level group were at higher risk for severe difficulty in ADLs (<i>OR</i>=12.450, 95%<i>CI</i>: 4.310-35.966) and IADLs (<i>OR</i>=5.479, 95%<i>CI</i>: 1.311-22.904). <b>Conclusions:</b> Heterogeneity in trajectory of intrinsic capacity exists in people aged ≥50 years in Shanghai. Middle-aged and elderly people with low initial level and rapid decline trajectory of intrinsic capacity are at greater risk for the decline of daily life ability and the increase of disability. It is necessary to strengthen the long-term dynamic monitoring and evaluation of the change trajectory of intrinsic capacity in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23968,"journal":{"name":"中华流行病学杂志","volume":"46 7","pages":"1209-1216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华流行病学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20241115-00728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the change trajectory of intrinsic capacity in people aged ≥50 years in Shanghai and explore the impact of intrinsic capacity trajectory change on overall function and dalily life activities in this population. Methods: The longitudinal data from round 1 to 3 Study of Global Ageing and Adult Health in Shanghai were used. The total intrinsic ability scores from five dimensions of cognition, psychology, sensory, vitality and locomotion were calculated. The censored normal model of group-based trajectory was used to identify the trajectory of intrinsic capacity change over time. Linear regression model and multivariate logistic regression model were used to analyse the effects of different levels intrinsic capacity trajectory on the scores of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS), the activity of daily living (ADL) and the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Results: A total of 2 302 study participants aged ≥50 years with 3 round complete data were included in this study, and 3 levels of intrinsic capacity trajectory were identified, low-level trajectory (9.3%), medium-level trajectory (41.7%), and high-level trajectory (49.0%). Compared with the high-level group, the medium-level and low-level groups had higher WHODAS scores, which increased by 3.578 (95%CI: 2.028-5.129) and 12.620 (95%CI: 9.951-15.289), respectively, and those with more severe disability and those in the low-level group were at higher risk for severe difficulty in ADLs (OR=12.450, 95%CI: 4.310-35.966) and IADLs (OR=5.479, 95%CI: 1.311-22.904). Conclusions: Heterogeneity in trajectory of intrinsic capacity exists in people aged ≥50 years in Shanghai. Middle-aged and elderly people with low initial level and rapid decline trajectory of intrinsic capacity are at greater risk for the decline of daily life ability and the increase of disability. It is necessary to strengthen the long-term dynamic monitoring and evaluation of the change trajectory of intrinsic capacity in this population.

[上海50岁及以上人群内在能力与日常生活能力的关系轨迹]。
目的:了解上海市≥50岁人群内容量的变化轨迹,探讨内容量轨迹变化对该人群整体功能和日常生活活动的影响。方法:采用全球老龄化与上海市成人健康研究第1 ~ 3轮的纵向数据。从认知、心理、感觉、活力和运动五个维度计算总内在能力得分。采用基于群体轨迹的截尾正态模型来识别内在能力随时间变化的轨迹。采用线性回归模型和多元logistic回归模型分析不同水平的内在能力轨迹对WHO残疾评定表(WHODAS)评分、日常生活活动(ADL)评分和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)评分的影响。结果:本研究共纳入2 302名年龄≥50岁、3轮完整资料的研究对象,确定了3个水平的内在能力轨迹,即低水平轨迹(9.3%)、中等水平轨迹(41.7%)和高水平轨迹(49.0%)。与高水平组相比,中等水平组和低水平组的WHODAS评分分别提高了3.578 (95%CI: 2.028 ~ 5.129)和12.620 (95%CI: 9.951 ~ 15.289),重度残疾组和低水平组的adl (OR=12.450, 95%CI: 4.310 ~ 35.966)和iadl (OR=5.479, 95%CI: 1.311 ~ 22.904)发生严重困难的风险更高。结论:上海地区≥50岁人群内在能力轨迹存在异质性。初始水平低、内在能力下降轨迹快的中老年人日常生活能力下降、残疾增加的风险更大。有必要加强对该人群内在能力变化轨迹的长期动态监测和评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华流行病学杂志
中华流行病学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8981
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Epidemiology, established in 1981, is an advanced academic periodical in epidemiology and related disciplines in China, which, according to the principle of integrating theory with practice, mainly reports the major progress in epidemiological research. The columns of the journal include commentary, expert forum, original article, field investigation, disease surveillance, laboratory research, clinical epidemiology, basic theory or method and review, etc.  The journal is included by more than ten major biomedical databases and index systems worldwide, such as been indexed in Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, PubMed Central (PMC), Europe PubMed Central, Embase, Chemical Abstract, Chinese Science and Technology Paper and Citation Database (CSTPCD), Chinese core journal essentials overview, Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) core database, Chinese Biological Medical Disc (CBMdisc), and Chinese Medical Citation Index (CMCI), etc. It is one of the core academic journals and carefully selected core journals in preventive and basic medicine in China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信