Effectiveness and safety of intermittent catheterisation for the management of acute urinary retention: A prospective, randomised, multicentre, controlled study.

IF 0.7 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Vigen Malkhasyan, Sergey Kotov, Ibragim Mamaev, Sergey Belomytcev, Roman Perov, Sergey Pulbere, Alexey Volnukhin, Bagrat Grigoryan, Dmitry Pushkar
{"title":"Effectiveness and safety of intermittent catheterisation for the management of acute urinary retention: A prospective, randomised, multicentre, controlled study.","authors":"Vigen Malkhasyan, Sergey Kotov, Ibragim Mamaev, Sergey Belomytcev, Roman Perov, Sergey Pulbere, Alexey Volnukhin, Bagrat Grigoryan, Dmitry Pushkar","doi":"10.1177/03915603251355815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC) in the management of acute urinary retention (AUR) and identify factors those affect the likelihood of recovery of spontaneous urination and the development of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective multicentre comparative randomised study included 129 patients hospitalised in urological hospitals with AUR due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients were randomised into two groups. In group I, the classical tactics of TWOC (drainage of the bladder with a urethral Foley catheter for 3 days) were used, whereas in group II, patients underwent CIC for 3 days. A comparative assessment of the effectiveness of intermittent catheterisation was carried out and compared to the classical tactics of TWOC (trial without catheter/attempt without catheter).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Normal voiding was restored in 25 (35.7%) patients in group I and 26 (44%) patients in group II. The point estimate of the probability of urination recovery on the third day of therapy in group II was 1.5 times higher than that in group I. The difference between these estimates was not statistically significant. In group II, 1 (3.8%) patient recovered spontaneous urination within 1 day, 12 (46.2%) within 2 days, and 13 (50%) by the end of 3 days. On the seventh day, AUR recurred in three (2.3%) patients: two (2.8%) in group I and one (1.7%) in group II. Statistically significant relationships were found between the probability of developing gross haematuria and patient age, as well as between possible urethrorrhagia and a history of AUR, between age and the use of α1-blockers at the time of AUR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intermittent catheterisation is an effective treatment for AUR. Its main advantages include the possibility of outpatient management, earlier recovery of spontaneous urination and significantly less severe catheter-associated lower urinary tract symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":23574,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3915603251355815"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03915603251355815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC) in the management of acute urinary retention (AUR) and identify factors those affect the likelihood of recovery of spontaneous urination and the development of adverse events.

Materials and methods: A prospective multicentre comparative randomised study included 129 patients hospitalised in urological hospitals with AUR due to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Patients were randomised into two groups. In group I, the classical tactics of TWOC (drainage of the bladder with a urethral Foley catheter for 3 days) were used, whereas in group II, patients underwent CIC for 3 days. A comparative assessment of the effectiveness of intermittent catheterisation was carried out and compared to the classical tactics of TWOC (trial without catheter/attempt without catheter).

Results: Normal voiding was restored in 25 (35.7%) patients in group I and 26 (44%) patients in group II. The point estimate of the probability of urination recovery on the third day of therapy in group II was 1.5 times higher than that in group I. The difference between these estimates was not statistically significant. In group II, 1 (3.8%) patient recovered spontaneous urination within 1 day, 12 (46.2%) within 2 days, and 13 (50%) by the end of 3 days. On the seventh day, AUR recurred in three (2.3%) patients: two (2.8%) in group I and one (1.7%) in group II. Statistically significant relationships were found between the probability of developing gross haematuria and patient age, as well as between possible urethrorrhagia and a history of AUR, between age and the use of α1-blockers at the time of AUR.

Conclusion: Intermittent catheterisation is an effective treatment for AUR. Its main advantages include the possibility of outpatient management, earlier recovery of spontaneous urination and significantly less severe catheter-associated lower urinary tract symptoms.

间歇性导尿治疗急性尿潴留的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心对照研究。
目的:评估清洁间歇导尿(CIC)治疗急性尿潴留(AUR)的有效性和安全性,并确定影响自主排尿恢复可能性和不良事件发生的因素。材料和方法:一项前瞻性多中心比较随机研究纳入129例因良性前列腺增生而在泌尿科医院住院的AUR患者。患者被随机分为两组。在I组中,采用经典的TWOC策略(用尿道Foley导尿管引流膀胱3天),而在II组中,患者接受CIC 3天。对间歇性导尿的有效性进行了比较评估,并与经典的TWOC策略(无导管的试验/无导管的尝试)进行了比较。结果:ⅰ组25例(35.7%),ⅱ组26例(44%)恢复正常排尿。治疗第3天排尿恢复概率的点估计值是治疗第3天排尿恢复概率的点估计值的1.5倍,组间差异无统计学意义。II组1天内自行排尿1例(3.8%),2天内自行排尿12例(46.2%),3天内自行排尿13例(50%)。第7天,3例(2.3%)患者出现AUR复发:1组2例(2.8%),2组1例(1.7%)。发生肉眼血尿的概率与患者年龄、可能的尿道出血与AUR病史、年龄与AUR时使用α1受体阻滞剂之间存在统计学意义的关系。结论:间歇置管是治疗AUR的有效方法。其主要优点包括门诊管理的可能性,更早地恢复自主排尿和显著减轻导尿管相关的下尿路症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Journal
Urologia Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信