Investigation of the Therapeutic Potential of Boric Acid in Enteritis-Induced Quails.

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Sultan Aslan, Ulku G Simsek, Hatice Eroksuz, Burcu Karagulle, Mehmet Eroglu, Gokhan K Incili, Canan A Incili
{"title":"Investigation of the Therapeutic Potential of Boric Acid in Enteritis-Induced Quails.","authors":"Sultan Aslan, Ulku G Simsek, Hatice Eroksuz, Burcu Karagulle, Mehmet Eroglu, Gokhan K Incili, Canan A Incili","doi":"10.1002/vms3.70481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of boric acid added to feed and water on intestinal histopathology, immune parameters, and intestinal bacterial flora in experimentally enteritis-induced Japanese quails. Eighty-four quails were used in the study, which were divided into seven groups. The following groups were used in the study: control (G1), infected (G2), infected + antibiotic (G3), infected + boric acid added to feed (100 mg/kg) (G4), infected + boric acid added to feed (300 mg/kg) (G5), infected + boric acid added into water (100 mg/L) (G6) and infected + boric acid added into water (300 mg/L) (G7). Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA, and differences between groups were determined by Tukey's honestly significant difference test. The highest levels of white blood cells were found in the infection group, whereas the lowest levels were found in the control group (p < 0.05). Boric acid taken with water decreased the number of Enterobacteriaceae, Escherchia coli, and total mesophilic aerobic bacteria. However, these differences were not significant compared with the infection group (p > 0.05). Compared to the Infected group (G2), the most notable reductions in coliform counts were observed in the boric acid water 300 mg/L group (G7), which decreased from 3.29 to 2.90 log CFU/g (p < 0.01), and in the 100 mg/L group (G6), which showed a decrease to 2.93 log CFU/g (p < 0.01), In contrast, boric acid given in feed (G4 and G5) had no significant effect on any bacterial count compared to the infected group p > 0.05). Consequently, Effective results were observed when boric acid was added to drinking water, even with short-term (7 days) use. Boron derivatives could provide an effective alternative treatment option, especially in combating the growing antibiotic resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23543,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","volume":"11 4","pages":"e70481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12272505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Medicine and Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.70481","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of boric acid added to feed and water on intestinal histopathology, immune parameters, and intestinal bacterial flora in experimentally enteritis-induced Japanese quails. Eighty-four quails were used in the study, which were divided into seven groups. The following groups were used in the study: control (G1), infected (G2), infected + antibiotic (G3), infected + boric acid added to feed (100 mg/kg) (G4), infected + boric acid added to feed (300 mg/kg) (G5), infected + boric acid added into water (100 mg/L) (G6) and infected + boric acid added into water (300 mg/L) (G7). Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA, and differences between groups were determined by Tukey's honestly significant difference test. The highest levels of white blood cells were found in the infection group, whereas the lowest levels were found in the control group (p < 0.05). Boric acid taken with water decreased the number of Enterobacteriaceae, Escherchia coli, and total mesophilic aerobic bacteria. However, these differences were not significant compared with the infection group (p > 0.05). Compared to the Infected group (G2), the most notable reductions in coliform counts were observed in the boric acid water 300 mg/L group (G7), which decreased from 3.29 to 2.90 log CFU/g (p < 0.01), and in the 100 mg/L group (G6), which showed a decrease to 2.93 log CFU/g (p < 0.01), In contrast, boric acid given in feed (G4 and G5) had no significant effect on any bacterial count compared to the infected group p > 0.05). Consequently, Effective results were observed when boric acid was added to drinking water, even with short-term (7 days) use. Boron derivatives could provide an effective alternative treatment option, especially in combating the growing antibiotic resistance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

硼酸对肠炎鹌鹑治疗作用的研究。
本试验研究了硼酸对实验性肠炎日本鹌鹑肠道组织病理学、免疫参数和肠道菌群的影响。84只鹌鹑被分为7组。采用对照组(G1)、感染组(G2)、感染组+抗生素组(G3)、感染组+饲料中添加硼酸(100 mg/kg) (G4)、感染组+饲料中添加硼酸(300 mg/kg) (G5)、感染组+水中添加硼酸(100 mg/L) (G6)和感染组+水中添加硼酸(300 mg/L) (G7)。数据分析采用单因素方差分析,组间差异采用Tukey's诚实显著性差异检验。感染组白细胞水平最高,对照组最低(p < 0.05)。与水一起服用硼酸可减少肠杆菌科、大肠杆菌和总嗜中温需氧细菌的数量。但与感染组比较差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。与感染组(G2)相比,300 mg/L硼酸水组(G7)和100 mg/L硼酸水组(G6)的大肠菌群数量下降最为显著,分别从3.29 log CFU/g降至2.90 log CFU/g (p < 0.01)和2.93 log CFU/g (p < 0.01),而饲料中添加硼酸(G4和G5)对细菌数量的影响均不显著(p < 0.05)。因此,将硼酸添加到饮用水中,即使是短期(7天)使用,也能观察到有效的效果。硼衍生物可以提供一种有效的替代治疗方案,特别是在对抗日益增长的抗生素耐药性方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Medicine and Science
Veterinary Medicine and Science Veterinary-General Veterinary
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
期刊介绍: Veterinary Medicine and Science is the peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of veterinary medicine and science. The journal aims to serve the research community by providing a vehicle for authors wishing to publish interesting and high quality work in both fundamental and clinical veterinary medicine and science. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. We aim to be a truly global forum for high-quality research in veterinary medicine and science, and believe that the best research should be published and made widely accessible as quickly as possible. Veterinary Medicine and Science publishes papers submitted directly to the journal and those referred from a select group of prestigious journals published by Wiley-Blackwell. Veterinary Medicine and Science is a Wiley Open Access journal, one of a new series of peer-reviewed titles publishing quality research with speed and efficiency. For further information visit the Wiley Open Access website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信