Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy with Prevena™ to prevent perineal surgical site infection.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ryo Ohno, Gumpei Yoshimatsu, Yoshiro Itatani, Ryosuke Okamura, Yu Yoshida, Hisatsugu Maekawa, Nobuaki Hoshino, Koya Hida, Kazutaka Obama, Suguru Hasegawa
{"title":"Prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy with Prevena™ to prevent perineal surgical site infection.","authors":"Ryo Ohno, Gumpei Yoshimatsu, Yoshiro Itatani, Ryosuke Okamura, Yu Yoshida, Hisatsugu Maekawa, Nobuaki Hoshino, Koya Hida, Kazutaka Obama, Suguru Hasegawa","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03102-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Surgical site infection (SSI) of perineal wounds after abdominoperineal resection (APR) or total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for pelvic malignancies is a common postoperative complication. Although several attempts have been made to prevent this complication, SSI of perineal wounds remain common. The efficacy of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in abdominal surgery has been reported; however, few studies have focused on perineal wounds, where the incidence of SSI is particularly high. This study investigated the prophylactic effect of NPWT on closed perineal wounds after APR/TPE to prevent SSI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 127 consecutive patients with malignant tumors who underwent elective APR/TPE between January 2013 and December 2022. We used the Prevena™ incision management system (IMS) on the perineal wound in 10 patients for prophylactic NPWT (pNPWT group), whereas 117 patients underwent conventional primary closure (cPC group). We compared the incidence of perineal wound SSI between the groups and explored the risk factors associated with SSI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients' backgrounds were essentially the same between the groups. There were no SSI cases in the pNPWT group, whereas 29 patients (25%) in the cPC group had SSI (P = 0.067). Exploratory analyses revealed that a body mass index ≥ 25, disinfection method, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly correlated with SSI in perineal wounds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic NPWT for closed perineal wounds after APR/TPE in patients with malignancies can be effective in preventing SSI.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03102-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Surgical site infection (SSI) of perineal wounds after abdominoperineal resection (APR) or total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for pelvic malignancies is a common postoperative complication. Although several attempts have been made to prevent this complication, SSI of perineal wounds remain common. The efficacy of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in abdominal surgery has been reported; however, few studies have focused on perineal wounds, where the incidence of SSI is particularly high. This study investigated the prophylactic effect of NPWT on closed perineal wounds after APR/TPE to prevent SSI.

Methods: This study enrolled 127 consecutive patients with malignant tumors who underwent elective APR/TPE between January 2013 and December 2022. We used the Prevena™ incision management system (IMS) on the perineal wound in 10 patients for prophylactic NPWT (pNPWT group), whereas 117 patients underwent conventional primary closure (cPC group). We compared the incidence of perineal wound SSI between the groups and explored the risk factors associated with SSI.

Results: Patients' backgrounds were essentially the same between the groups. There were no SSI cases in the pNPWT group, whereas 29 patients (25%) in the cPC group had SSI (P = 0.067). Exploratory analyses revealed that a body mass index ≥ 25, disinfection method, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly correlated with SSI in perineal wounds.

Conclusion: Prophylactic NPWT for closed perineal wounds after APR/TPE in patients with malignancies can be effective in preventing SSI.

预防性负压伤口治疗,预防会阴手术部位感染。
目的:腹会阴切除术(APR)或全盆腔切除术(TPE)后会阴伤口手术部位感染(SSI)是盆腔恶性肿瘤术后常见的并发症。虽然已经做了一些尝试来防止这种并发症,会阴伤口的SSI仍然很常见。预防性负压伤口治疗(NPWT)在腹部手术中的疗效已被报道;然而,很少有研究关注会阴伤口,那里的SSI发生率特别高。本研究探讨了NPWT对APR/TPE术后会阴闭合性创面的预防作用。方法:本研究在2013年1月至2022年12月期间招募了127例连续接受选择性APR/TPE的恶性肿瘤患者。我们采用preva™切口管理系统(IMS)对会阴创面进行预防性NPWT治疗10例(pNPWT组),而常规一期缝合117例(cPC组)。我们比较了两组会阴伤口SSI的发生率,并探讨了与SSI相关的危险因素。结果:两组患者背景基本一致。pNPWT组无SSI病例,而cPC组有29例(25%)SSI (P = 0.067)。探索性分析显示,体重指数≥25、消毒方法和新辅助化疗与会阴创面SSI显著相关。结论:恶性肿瘤APR/TPE术后闭合性会阴创面预防性NPWT可有效预防SSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信