Spinal collagen mesotherapy in patients with chronic thoracic back pain: a retrospective analysis of effectiveness and safety in a 3-month follow-up.

IF 1.7 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Reumatologia Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5114/reum/200192
Kamil Koszela, Marta Woldańska-Okońska, Agnieszka Skoczylas, Michał Słupiński, Robert Gasik
{"title":"Spinal collagen mesotherapy in patients with chronic thoracic back pain: a retrospective analysis of effectiveness and safety in a 3-month follow-up.","authors":"Kamil Koszela, Marta Woldańska-Okońska, Agnieszka Skoczylas, Michał Słupiński, Robert Gasik","doi":"10.5114/reum/200192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thoracic spine pain syndrome is far less common than lumbosacral or cervical pain. This pathology is often caused by work-related overload, especially sedentary work, lack of regular sport activities, and adopting incorrect postures. Thoracic spine pain may result, for instance, from degenerative joint lesions. In consequence, there is a reflex contraction of the soft, paraspinal tissues (muscles, fascia, ligaments). In this case, one of the treatment methods is spinal mesotherapy. The purpose of the present research was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thoracic spinal mesotherapy with collagen type I vs. lignocaine.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the results of the treatment of patients with chronic thoracic back pain syndrome using mesotherapy was performed. A total of 130 patients (49 men and 81 women; mean age: 49 ±9 years) were divided into 2 groups: group A (<i>n</i> = 65), treated with collagen type I, and group B (<i>n</i> = 65), treated with lignocaine 1%. Mesotherapy was performed weekly over 5 weeks. Patients were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Laitinen scales before the therapy, after the therapy, and after a 3-month follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant improvement was observed after the use of thoracic spinal mesotherapy both with collagen type I and lignocaine, on the VAS and Laitinen scales, with the collagen treatment having better results at the 3-month follow-up visit. No adverse effects were observed after the procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Spinal mesotherapy is an effective and safe method of treating chronic thoracic back pain syndrome using collagen type I and lignocaine. However, in an average observation, collagen mesotherapy seems to be more effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":21312,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia","volume":"63 3","pages":"159-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/reum/200192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracic spine pain syndrome is far less common than lumbosacral or cervical pain. This pathology is often caused by work-related overload, especially sedentary work, lack of regular sport activities, and adopting incorrect postures. Thoracic spine pain may result, for instance, from degenerative joint lesions. In consequence, there is a reflex contraction of the soft, paraspinal tissues (muscles, fascia, ligaments). In this case, one of the treatment methods is spinal mesotherapy. The purpose of the present research was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of thoracic spinal mesotherapy with collagen type I vs. lignocaine.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of the results of the treatment of patients with chronic thoracic back pain syndrome using mesotherapy was performed. A total of 130 patients (49 men and 81 women; mean age: 49 ±9 years) were divided into 2 groups: group A (n = 65), treated with collagen type I, and group B (n = 65), treated with lignocaine 1%. Mesotherapy was performed weekly over 5 weeks. Patients were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Laitinen scales before the therapy, after the therapy, and after a 3-month follow-up visit.

Results: A statistically significant improvement was observed after the use of thoracic spinal mesotherapy both with collagen type I and lignocaine, on the VAS and Laitinen scales, with the collagen treatment having better results at the 3-month follow-up visit. No adverse effects were observed after the procedures.

Conclusions: Spinal mesotherapy is an effective and safe method of treating chronic thoracic back pain syndrome using collagen type I and lignocaine. However, in an average observation, collagen mesotherapy seems to be more effective.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脊柱胶原疗法治疗慢性胸背部疼痛患者:3个月随访的有效性和安全性回顾性分析
胸椎疼痛综合征远不如腰骶或颈椎疼痛常见。这种病理通常是由工作负荷过重引起的,特别是久坐不动的工作,缺乏规律的体育活动,以及采取不正确的姿势。例如,退行性关节病变可能导致胸椎疼痛。因此,软的、棘旁组织(肌肉、筋膜、韧带)会反射性收缩。在这种情况下,其中一种治疗方法是脊柱化疗。本研究的目的是评价I型胶原与利多卡因胸椎化疗的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:回顾性分析采用美射疗法治疗慢性胸背部疼痛综合征患者的结果。共130例患者(男49例,女81例;平均年龄:49±9岁)分为2组:A组(n = 65),采用I型胶原治疗;B组(n = 65),采用1%的利多卡因治疗。每周进行美射治疗,持续5周。在治疗前、治疗后和随访3个月后,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Laitinen量表对患者进行评估。结果:采用ⅰ型胶原蛋白和利多卡因进行胸椎美施治疗后,VAS评分和Laitinen评分均有统计学意义的改善,随访3个月时,胶原蛋白治疗效果更好。术后未见不良反应。结论:采用I型胶原蛋白联合利多卡因治疗慢性胸背部疼痛综合征是一种安全有效的方法。然而,在平均观察中,胶原疗法似乎更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reumatologia
Reumatologia Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信