The influence of catheter type, the number of sutures and patients' age on percutaneous nephrostomy displacement.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Dimitrij Kuhelj, Ana Sustersic, Urban Zdesar
{"title":"The influence of catheter type, the number of sutures and patients' age on percutaneous nephrostomy displacement.","authors":"Dimitrij Kuhelj, Ana Sustersic, Urban Zdesar","doi":"10.2478/raon-2025-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous nephrostomy displacement results in procedure failure, reducing quality of life in patients with hydronephrosis. Scarce data about factors influencing displacement led to evaluation of our data in order to give better insight into this topic.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients admitted for percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) exchange between March 3<sup>rd</sup> and October 3<sup>rd</sup> 2023 were included in our prospective observational study aiming to determine possible factors influencing PCN displacement. Catheter type, number of sutures and patients' age over 70 years were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-square test were used; value less than 0.05 was determined as statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 57 patients (35 males; mean age 71.4 years) in the study. Loop catheters with strings were implanted 58 times and without strings 17 times. Fixation was achieved by 55 single and by 20 double sutures. 17 PCN (22.7%) were displaced in designated period. The mean time from PCN implantation to exchange was 4.16 months. Neither catheter type, number of sutures or patients' age significantly influenced PCN displacement (chi-square 0.57, 0.34 and 0.61, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference in PCN displacement between two types of catheters and the number of fixing sutures was detected. Elderly patients had similar rates of PCN displacements as younger ones. The most important causes of PCN displacement remained probably patients' activity and a care for PCN during months after the implantation. Proper patients' education and care of the PCN are possibly the keys for long-term success.</p>","PeriodicalId":21034,"journal":{"name":"Radiology and Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2025-0037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous nephrostomy displacement results in procedure failure, reducing quality of life in patients with hydronephrosis. Scarce data about factors influencing displacement led to evaluation of our data in order to give better insight into this topic.

Patients and methods: Patients admitted for percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) exchange between March 3rd and October 3rd 2023 were included in our prospective observational study aiming to determine possible factors influencing PCN displacement. Catheter type, number of sutures and patients' age over 70 years were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's chi-square test were used; value less than 0.05 was determined as statistically significant.

Results: We included 57 patients (35 males; mean age 71.4 years) in the study. Loop catheters with strings were implanted 58 times and without strings 17 times. Fixation was achieved by 55 single and by 20 double sutures. 17 PCN (22.7%) were displaced in designated period. The mean time from PCN implantation to exchange was 4.16 months. Neither catheter type, number of sutures or patients' age significantly influenced PCN displacement (chi-square 0.57, 0.34 and 0.61, respectively).

Conclusions: No significant difference in PCN displacement between two types of catheters and the number of fixing sutures was detected. Elderly patients had similar rates of PCN displacements as younger ones. The most important causes of PCN displacement remained probably patients' activity and a care for PCN during months after the implantation. Proper patients' education and care of the PCN are possibly the keys for long-term success.

导管类型、缝线次数及患者年龄对经皮肾造口移位的影响。
背景:经皮肾造口移位导致手术失败,降低肾积水患者的生活质量。关于影响位移因素的稀缺数据导致对我们的数据进行评估,以便更好地了解这一主题。患者和方法:我们的前瞻性观察研究纳入了2023年3月3日至10月3日期间接受经皮肾造口术(PCN)置换的患者,旨在确定影响PCN移位的可能因素。分析导管类型、缝合次数及患者年龄≥70岁。采用描述性统计和Pearson卡方检验;值小于0.05为有统计学意义。结果:我们纳入了57例患者(男性35例;平均年龄71.4岁)。带线环形导管植入术58次,无线环形导管植入术17次。55个单缝线和20个双缝线完成固定。17名PCN(22.7%)在指定时间内流离失所。从PCN植入到交换的平均时间为4.16个月。导管类型、缝线数和患者年龄对PCN移位均无显著影响(卡方分别为0.57、0.34和0.61)。结论:两种导管PCN移位及固定线数无显著差异。老年患者的PCN移位率与年轻患者相似。PCN移位的最重要原因可能仍然是患者的活动和植入后数月对PCN的护理。适当的患者教育和护理PCN可能是长期成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiology and Oncology
Radiology and Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology and Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to the publishing original and high quality scientific papers and review articles, pertinent to diagnostic and interventional radiology, computerized tomography, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy, clinical and experimental oncology, radiobiology, medical physics and radiation protection. Therefore, the scope of the journal is to cover beside radiology the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects in oncology, which distinguishes it from other journals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信