Withstand Context: Standing Posture Improves Contextual Cueing in Challenging Visual Search.

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Artyom Zinchenko, Nuno Busch, Gordon Dodwell, Thomas Geyer
{"title":"Withstand Context: Standing Posture Improves Contextual Cueing in Challenging Visual Search.","authors":"Artyom Zinchenko, Nuno Busch, Gordon Dodwell, Thomas Geyer","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Humans can learn to use repeated spatial arrangements of irrelevant, non-target items to direct the focus of attention towards behaviorally relevant-target-items, a phenomenon known as contextual cueing (CC). However, whether CC is itself dependent on attentional resources is a controversial issue. Here, we used visual search to test how CC is affected when attention varies through two types of manipulations: perceptual load (as induced by target-distractor similarity) and postural load (sitting vs. standing). For easy searches (low target-distractor similarity), we observed reliable facilitation of search in repeated-context displays, which was independent of participants' body posture. For difficult searches (high target-distractor similarity), contextual facilitation was evident only with standing posture. Posture-related benefits remained significant even after controlling for heart rate variability (HRV), body mass index, and physical activity. Decomposing aggregated reaction times by drift-diffusion modeling revealed that CC in difficult searches decreased the amount of evidence required for target-response decisions. Our results suggest that statistical learning is effectively supplemented during standing posture when visual search is challenging, possibly because posture manipulation and contextual manipulation affect common response-selection stages of processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 7","pages":"e70108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12272028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans can learn to use repeated spatial arrangements of irrelevant, non-target items to direct the focus of attention towards behaviorally relevant-target-items, a phenomenon known as contextual cueing (CC). However, whether CC is itself dependent on attentional resources is a controversial issue. Here, we used visual search to test how CC is affected when attention varies through two types of manipulations: perceptual load (as induced by target-distractor similarity) and postural load (sitting vs. standing). For easy searches (low target-distractor similarity), we observed reliable facilitation of search in repeated-context displays, which was independent of participants' body posture. For difficult searches (high target-distractor similarity), contextual facilitation was evident only with standing posture. Posture-related benefits remained significant even after controlling for heart rate variability (HRV), body mass index, and physical activity. Decomposing aggregated reaction times by drift-diffusion modeling revealed that CC in difficult searches decreased the amount of evidence required for target-response decisions. Our results suggest that statistical learning is effectively supplemented during standing posture when visual search is challenging, possibly because posture manipulation and contextual manipulation affect common response-selection stages of processing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经得起语境:站立姿势在具有挑战性的视觉搜索中提高语境线索。
人类可以学会使用不相关的、非目标物品的重复空间排列,将注意力集中在与行为相关的目标物品上,这种现象被称为情境线索(CC)。然而,CC本身是否依赖于注意资源是一个有争议的问题。在这里,我们使用视觉搜索来测试当注意力通过两种类型的操作变化时,CC是如何受到影响的:知觉负荷(由目标-分心物相似性引起)和姿势负荷(坐着与站着)。对于容易搜索(低目标-分心物相似性),我们观察到在重复上下文显示中可靠的搜索促进,这与参与者的身体姿势无关。对于困难搜索(目标-干扰物相似性高),语境促进作用仅在站立姿势下才明显。即使在控制心率变异性(HRV)、身体质量指数和身体活动之后,与姿势相关的益处仍然显著。通过漂移-扩散模型分解聚合反应时间表明,CC在困难搜索中减少了目标响应决策所需的证据量。我们的研究结果表明,当视觉搜索具有挑战性时,站立姿势的统计学习得到了有效的补充,这可能是因为姿势操作和上下文操作影响了处理的共同反应选择阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信