{"title":"A simple and low-cost method for fluoride analysis of plant materials using alkali extraction and ion-selective electrode.","authors":"Chenyu Zhang, Mark G M Aarts, Antony van der Ent","doi":"10.1186/s13007-025-01412-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>Existing methods for fluoride (F<sup>-</sup>) determination in plant material require expensive equipment and specialized reagents. This study aimed to develop a simple and cost-effective method for fluoride analysis in plant samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using an orthogonal assay design with certified reference material, this study optimized a sodium hydroxide extraction method (5 mol·L<sup>-1</sup>) with heating at 120 °C for 0.5 h, followed by the addition of potassium acetate, ionic strength adjustment, and measurement via an ion-selective electrode. The method achieved a limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of 1.41 and 4.71 mg·kg⁻¹, respectively. Recovery rates ranged from 84.74 to 89.34% in Arabidopsis thaliana (intraday relative standard deviation [RSD] ≤ 2.31%, inter-day RSD ≤ 4.17%) and from 83.53 to 91.55% in Camellia sinensis (intraday RSD ≤ 3.11%, inter-day RSD ≤ 4.98%). In A. thaliana cultivated in NaF-dosed (500 µM) nutrient solution, the fluoride concentration in the shoot was 16.00 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>; In C. sinensis grown under 250 µM NaF treatment, the shoot fluoride concentration was 292.71 mg·kg<sup>-1</sup>. Moreover, the fluoride concentration in Tea products purchased from local supermarkets ranged from 16.28 to 61.78 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a simple, reliable, and cost-effective method for fluoride analysis in plant materials, which can be further validated through inter-laboratory testing to establish a standardized approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":20100,"journal":{"name":"Plant Methods","volume":"21 1","pages":"98"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12269121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-025-01412-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgrounds: Existing methods for fluoride (F-) determination in plant material require expensive equipment and specialized reagents. This study aimed to develop a simple and cost-effective method for fluoride analysis in plant samples.
Results: Using an orthogonal assay design with certified reference material, this study optimized a sodium hydroxide extraction method (5 mol·L-1) with heating at 120 °C for 0.5 h, followed by the addition of potassium acetate, ionic strength adjustment, and measurement via an ion-selective electrode. The method achieved a limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of 1.41 and 4.71 mg·kg⁻¹, respectively. Recovery rates ranged from 84.74 to 89.34% in Arabidopsis thaliana (intraday relative standard deviation [RSD] ≤ 2.31%, inter-day RSD ≤ 4.17%) and from 83.53 to 91.55% in Camellia sinensis (intraday RSD ≤ 3.11%, inter-day RSD ≤ 4.98%). In A. thaliana cultivated in NaF-dosed (500 µM) nutrient solution, the fluoride concentration in the shoot was 16.00 mg·kg-1; In C. sinensis grown under 250 µM NaF treatment, the shoot fluoride concentration was 292.71 mg·kg-1. Moreover, the fluoride concentration in Tea products purchased from local supermarkets ranged from 16.28 to 61.78 mg kg-1.
Conclusion: This study presents a simple, reliable, and cost-effective method for fluoride analysis in plant materials, which can be further validated through inter-laboratory testing to establish a standardized approach.
期刊介绍:
Plant Methods is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal for the plant research community that encompasses all aspects of technological innovation in the plant sciences.
There is no doubt that we have entered an exciting new era in plant biology. The completion of the Arabidopsis genome sequence, and the rapid progress being made in other plant genomics projects are providing unparalleled opportunities for progress in all areas of plant science. Nevertheless, enormous challenges lie ahead if we are to understand the function of every gene in the genome, and how the individual parts work together to make the whole organism. Achieving these goals will require an unprecedented collaborative effort, combining high-throughput, system-wide technologies with more focused approaches that integrate traditional disciplines such as cell biology, biochemistry and molecular genetics.
Technological innovation is probably the most important catalyst for progress in any scientific discipline. Plant Methods’ goal is to stimulate the development and adoption of new and improved techniques and research tools and, where appropriate, to promote consistency of methodologies for better integration of data from different laboratories.