Using Convolutional Neural Networks for the Classification of Suboptimal Chest Radiographs.

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Emily Huanke Liu, Daniel Carrion, Mohamed Khaldoun Badawy
{"title":"Using Convolutional Neural Networks for the Classification of Suboptimal Chest Radiographs.","authors":"Emily Huanke Liu, Daniel Carrion, Mohamed Khaldoun Badawy","doi":"10.1002/jmrs.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chest X-rays (CXR) rank among the most conducted X-ray examinations. They often require repeat imaging due to inadequate quality, leading to increased radiation exposure and delays in patient care and diagnosis. This research assesses the efficacy of DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 neural networks in detecting suboptimal CXRs, which may minimise delays and enhance patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 3587 patients with a median age of 67 (0-102). It utilised an initial dataset comprising 10,000 CXRs randomly divided into a training subset (4000 optimal and 4000 suboptimal) and a validation subset (400 optimal and 400 suboptimal). The test subset (25 optimal and 25 suboptimal) was curated from the remaining images to provide adequate variation. Neural networks DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 were chosen due to their capabilities in image classification. DenseNet121 is a robust, well-tested model in the medical industry with high accuracy in object recognition. YOLOv8 is a cutting-edge commercial model targeted at all industries. Their performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and compared to radiologist classification, utilising the chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DenseNet121 attained an AUROC of 0.97, while YOLOv8 recorded a score of 0.95, indicating a strong capability in differentiating between optimal and suboptimal CXRs. The alignment between radiologists and models exhibited variability, partly due to the lack of clinical indications. However, the performance was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both AI models effectively classified chest X-ray quality, demonstrating the potential for providing radiographers with feedback to improve image quality. Notably, this was the first study to include both PA and lateral CXRs as well as paediatric cases and the first to evaluate YOLOv8 for this application.</p>","PeriodicalId":16382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chest X-rays (CXR) rank among the most conducted X-ray examinations. They often require repeat imaging due to inadequate quality, leading to increased radiation exposure and delays in patient care and diagnosis. This research assesses the efficacy of DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 neural networks in detecting suboptimal CXRs, which may minimise delays and enhance patient outcomes.

Method: The study included 3587 patients with a median age of 67 (0-102). It utilised an initial dataset comprising 10,000 CXRs randomly divided into a training subset (4000 optimal and 4000 suboptimal) and a validation subset (400 optimal and 400 suboptimal). The test subset (25 optimal and 25 suboptimal) was curated from the remaining images to provide adequate variation. Neural networks DenseNet121 and YOLOv8 were chosen due to their capabilities in image classification. DenseNet121 is a robust, well-tested model in the medical industry with high accuracy in object recognition. YOLOv8 is a cutting-edge commercial model targeted at all industries. Their performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and compared to radiologist classification, utilising the chi-squared test.

Results: DenseNet121 attained an AUROC of 0.97, while YOLOv8 recorded a score of 0.95, indicating a strong capability in differentiating between optimal and suboptimal CXRs. The alignment between radiologists and models exhibited variability, partly due to the lack of clinical indications. However, the performance was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Both AI models effectively classified chest X-ray quality, demonstrating the potential for providing radiographers with feedback to improve image quality. Notably, this was the first study to include both PA and lateral CXRs as well as paediatric cases and the first to evaluate YOLOv8 for this application.

使用卷积神经网络对次优胸片进行分类。
简介:胸片(CXR)是最常用的x线检查之一。由于质量不足,它们通常需要重复成像,导致辐射暴露增加和患者护理和诊断延误。本研究评估了DenseNet121和YOLOv8神经网络在检测次优cxr方面的功效,这可能会最大限度地减少延迟并提高患者的预后。方法:研究纳入3587例患者,中位年龄67岁(0 ~ 102岁)。它使用了一个初始数据集,其中包含10,000个cxr,随机分为训练子集(4000个最优和4000个次优)和验证子集(400个最优和400个次优)。测试子集(25个最优和25个次优)是从剩余的图像中挑选出来的,以提供足够的变化。选择神经网络DenseNet121和YOLOv8是因为它们具有图像分类的能力。DenseNet121是一个强大的,经过良好测试的模型,在医疗行业具有高精度的对象识别。YOLOv8是一款面向所有行业的前沿商业模式。他们的表现通过接受者工作曲线下面积(AUROC)进行评估,并利用卡方检验与放射科医生分类进行比较。结果:DenseNet121的AUROC为0.97,而YOLOv8的AUROC为0.95,表明其区分最佳和次优cxr的能力很强。放射科医生和模型之间的对齐表现出可变性,部分原因是缺乏临床适应症。然而,性能没有统计学意义。结论:两种人工智能模型都能有效地对胸部x线质量进行分类,展示了为放射技师提供反馈以提高图像质量的潜力。值得注意的是,这是第一个包括PA和侧位cxr以及儿科病例的研究,也是第一个评估YOLOv8在该应用中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences (JMRS) is an international and multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal that accepts manuscripts related to medical imaging / diagnostic radiography, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, medical ultrasound / sonography, and the complementary disciplines of medical physics, radiology, radiation oncology, nursing, psychology and sociology. Manuscripts may take the form of: original articles, review articles, commentary articles, technical evaluations, case series and case studies. JMRS promotes excellence in international medical radiation science by the publication of contemporary and advanced research that encourages the adoption of the best clinical, scientific and educational practices in international communities. JMRS is the official professional journal of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) and the New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology (NZIMRT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信