Propulsion without penalty: Greater soleus force with stiffer footwear does not necessarily increase estimated soleus metabolic cost across walking speeds.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Daniel J Davis, Samuel F Ray, Jason R Franz, Kota Z Takahashi
{"title":"Propulsion without penalty: Greater soleus force with stiffer footwear does not necessarily increase estimated soleus metabolic cost across walking speeds.","authors":"Daniel J Davis, Samuel F Ray, Jason R Franz, Kota Z Takahashi","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00045.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous assistive devices have been designed to improve mobility by improving propulsion and reducing the metabolic cost of walking. Stiff carbon fiber insoles integrated into footwear have emerged as a potentially viable option by increasing longitudinal bending stiffness, providing additional leverage for the ankle joint musculature and increasing soleus force output. However, it remains unknown whether this increased leverage comes with a metabolic penalty at the individual muscle level, which would create a translational barrier for prescribing carbon fiber insoles as targeted interventions. We incorporated motion capture, cine B-mode ultrasound, and electromyography data (N=14) into a bioenergetic model to estimate soleus metabolic cost. Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill at 1.25, 1.75, and 2.0 m/s wearing standardized shoes containing either no carbon fiber insole (low stiffness), a 1.6 mm thick insole (medium stiffness), or a 3.2 mm thick insole (high stiffness). We found a significant main effect (p < 0.001) of walking speed, but not stiffness, for estimated soleus average metabolic power. These results indicate that increases in soleus force output while walking due to increased footwear bending stiffness do not statistically significantly alter muscle-specific metabolic cost, likely due to concomitant reductions in fascicle shortening velocity. As such, carbon fiber insoles may be a particularly useful assistive device for walking in those with ankle plantarflexion deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00045.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous assistive devices have been designed to improve mobility by improving propulsion and reducing the metabolic cost of walking. Stiff carbon fiber insoles integrated into footwear have emerged as a potentially viable option by increasing longitudinal bending stiffness, providing additional leverage for the ankle joint musculature and increasing soleus force output. However, it remains unknown whether this increased leverage comes with a metabolic penalty at the individual muscle level, which would create a translational barrier for prescribing carbon fiber insoles as targeted interventions. We incorporated motion capture, cine B-mode ultrasound, and electromyography data (N=14) into a bioenergetic model to estimate soleus metabolic cost. Participants walked on an instrumented treadmill at 1.25, 1.75, and 2.0 m/s wearing standardized shoes containing either no carbon fiber insole (low stiffness), a 1.6 mm thick insole (medium stiffness), or a 3.2 mm thick insole (high stiffness). We found a significant main effect (p < 0.001) of walking speed, but not stiffness, for estimated soleus average metabolic power. These results indicate that increases in soleus force output while walking due to increased footwear bending stiffness do not statistically significantly alter muscle-specific metabolic cost, likely due to concomitant reductions in fascicle shortening velocity. As such, carbon fiber insoles may be a particularly useful assistive device for walking in those with ankle plantarflexion deficits.

没有惩罚的推进力:更硬的鞋子带来更大的比目鱼肌力量并不一定会增加步行速度下比目鱼肌的代谢成本。
许多辅助装置被设计用来通过提高推进力和减少行走的代谢成本来提高机动性。坚硬的碳纤维鞋垫集成到鞋类中,通过增加纵向弯曲刚度,为踝关节肌肉组织提供额外的杠杆作用,增加比目鱼肌的力量输出,成为一种潜在的可行选择。然而,目前尚不清楚这种增加的杠杆是否会在个体肌肉水平上带来代谢损失,这将为将碳纤维鞋垫作为有针对性的干预措施提供翻译障碍。我们将运动捕捉、电影b超和肌电图数据(N=14)纳入生物能量模型,以估计比目鱼代谢成本。参与者穿着不含碳纤维鞋垫(低刚度)、1.6毫米厚鞋垫(中等刚度)或3.2毫米厚鞋垫(高刚度)的标准化鞋子,以1.25、1.75和2.0米/秒的速度在仪器化的跑步机上行走。我们发现行走速度对比目鱼平均代谢能力有显著的主要影响(p < 0.001),而不是僵硬度。这些结果表明,由于鞋类弯曲刚度的增加,行走时比目鱼肌力量输出的增加并没有统计学上显著改变肌肉特异性代谢成本,这可能是由于束缩短速度的减少。因此,碳纤维鞋垫可能是一个特别有用的辅助装置,对那些踝关节跖屈曲缺陷的行走。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信