The Acute Effects of Caffeine and Normobaric Hypoxia on Cardiorespiratory Exercise Responses in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Benjamin Jonathan Narang, Ana Štritof, Tadej Debevec
{"title":"The Acute Effects of Caffeine and Normobaric Hypoxia on Cardiorespiratory Exercise Responses in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Benjamin Jonathan Narang, Ana Štritof, Tadej Debevec","doi":"10.1123/ijsnem.2025-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ergogenic effects of caffeine for endurance performance at sea level are well established. However, whether caffeine enhances exercise capacity or modulates cardiorespiratory responses in hypoxia remains unclear. Twenty-nine healthy, active volunteers (14 women) completed four tests in a pseudorandomized order, comprising 10 min of steady-state cycling (40% normoxic maximal aerobic power) followed by incremental exercise tests to exhaustion. Participants consumed 6 mg/kg body mass anhydrous caffeine, or placebo, 45 min before exercise. Tests were performed while breathing room air or a hypoxic gas mixture (simulating ∼3,500 m). At peak exercise intensity, oxygen uptake was affected by condition (hypoxia vs. normoxia; 44.8 ± 7.3 vs. 51.4 ± 7.9 ml·kg-1·min-1; p < .001) but not supplement (caffeine vs. placebo; 48.2 ± 8.2 vs. 48.0 ± 8.4 ml·kg-1·min-1; p = .501). Maximal aerobic power and pulse oxygen saturation were lower in hypoxia (both p < .001), but unaffected by caffeine (p = .061 and .898, respectively). Pulmonary ventilation was unaffected by hypoxia (p = .154) or caffeine (p = .117). Heart rate was higher in normoxia and with caffeine (both p < .001). During steady-state cycling, hypoxia (p < .001) and caffeine (p = .026) increased pulmonary ventilation. However, the hypoxia-induced pulse oxygen saturation decrease (p < .001) was not attenuated with caffeine (interaction p = .283). Perceived exertion was higher in hypoxia (p < .001) and lower with caffeine (p = .026). Caffeine increased vastus lateralis oxygenation in hypoxia (caffeine vs. placebo; 52 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 10%; p = .020) but not in normoxia (caffeine vs. placebo; 59 ± 7 vs. 59 ± 8%; p > .999). Overall, caffeine did not enhance exercise capacity in either environmental condition. However, during steady-state cycling, caffeine enhanced pulmonary ventilation, reduced perceived exertion, and mitigated hypoxia-induced muscle oxygenation reductions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14334,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sport nutrition and exercise metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.2025-0024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ergogenic effects of caffeine for endurance performance at sea level are well established. However, whether caffeine enhances exercise capacity or modulates cardiorespiratory responses in hypoxia remains unclear. Twenty-nine healthy, active volunteers (14 women) completed four tests in a pseudorandomized order, comprising 10 min of steady-state cycling (40% normoxic maximal aerobic power) followed by incremental exercise tests to exhaustion. Participants consumed 6 mg/kg body mass anhydrous caffeine, or placebo, 45 min before exercise. Tests were performed while breathing room air or a hypoxic gas mixture (simulating ∼3,500 m). At peak exercise intensity, oxygen uptake was affected by condition (hypoxia vs. normoxia; 44.8 ± 7.3 vs. 51.4 ± 7.9 ml·kg-1·min-1; p < .001) but not supplement (caffeine vs. placebo; 48.2 ± 8.2 vs. 48.0 ± 8.4 ml·kg-1·min-1; p = .501). Maximal aerobic power and pulse oxygen saturation were lower in hypoxia (both p < .001), but unaffected by caffeine (p = .061 and .898, respectively). Pulmonary ventilation was unaffected by hypoxia (p = .154) or caffeine (p = .117). Heart rate was higher in normoxia and with caffeine (both p < .001). During steady-state cycling, hypoxia (p < .001) and caffeine (p = .026) increased pulmonary ventilation. However, the hypoxia-induced pulse oxygen saturation decrease (p < .001) was not attenuated with caffeine (interaction p = .283). Perceived exertion was higher in hypoxia (p < .001) and lower with caffeine (p = .026). Caffeine increased vastus lateralis oxygenation in hypoxia (caffeine vs. placebo; 52 ± 8 vs. 50 ± 10%; p = .020) but not in normoxia (caffeine vs. placebo; 59 ± 7 vs. 59 ± 8%; p > .999). Overall, caffeine did not enhance exercise capacity in either environmental condition. However, during steady-state cycling, caffeine enhanced pulmonary ventilation, reduced perceived exertion, and mitigated hypoxia-induced muscle oxygenation reductions.

咖啡因和常压缺氧对健康成人心肺运动反应的急性影响:一项随机对照试验。
咖啡因在海平面上对耐力表现的人体作用已经得到了很好的证实。然而,咖啡因是否能增强运动能力或调节缺氧时的心肺反应仍不清楚。29名健康、活跃的志愿者(14名女性)按伪随机顺序完成了四项测试,包括10分钟的稳态循环(40%常氧最大有氧能力),然后是增量运动测试,直到精疲力竭。参与者在运动前45分钟摄入每公斤体重6毫克的无水咖啡因或安慰剂。在呼吸室内空气或低氧气体混合物(模拟~ 3500米)时进行测试。在运动强度达到峰值时,摄氧量受条件(缺氧vs.常氧)的影响;44.8±7.3 vs. 51.4±7.9 ml·kg-1·min-1;P < 0.001),但没有补充(咖啡因vs安慰剂;48.2±8.2 vs 48.0±8.4 ml·kg-1·min-1;P = .501)。最大有氧能力和脉搏氧饱和度在缺氧时较低(p < 0.001),但咖啡因对其没有影响(p分别为0.061和0.898)。肺通气不受缺氧(p = 0.154)或咖啡因(p = 0.117)的影响。常氧组和咖啡因组心率较高(p < 0.001)。在稳态循环中,缺氧(p < .001)和咖啡因(p = .026)增加了肺通气。然而,低氧诱导的脉搏血氧饱和度降低(p < 0.001)并没有因咖啡因而减弱(相互作用p = 0.283)。低氧组感觉运动强度高(p < 0.001),咖啡因组感觉运动强度低(p = 0.026)。咖啡因增加缺氧时股外侧肌氧合(咖啡因与安慰剂;52±8 vs. 50±10%;P = 0.020),但在正常缺氧情况下没有(咖啡因vs安慰剂;59±7% vs. 59±8%;P[0.99 .99]。总的来说,咖啡因在两种环境条件下都没有提高运动能力。然而,在稳态循环中,咖啡因增强了肺通气,减少了感知的劳累,减轻了缺氧引起的肌肉氧合减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism (IJSNEM) publishes original scientific investigations and scholarly reviews offering new insights into sport nutrition and exercise metabolism, as well as articles focusing on the application of the principles of biochemistry, physiology, and nutrition to sport and exercise. The journal also offers editorials, digests of related articles from other fields, research notes, and reviews of books, videos, and other media releases. To subscribe to either the print or e-version of IJSNEM, press the Subscribe or Renew button at the top of your screen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信