Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block for postoperative pain management in procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids: a randomized, double-blinded trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Peng Pan, Jingjing Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Wang Yang, Wengang Ding
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block for postoperative pain management in procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids: a randomized, double-blinded trial.","authors":"Peng Pan, Jingjing Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Wang Yang, Wengang Ding","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04953-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) versus local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) in managing the pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 78 patients undergoing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided PNB or LAI. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale at multiple time points within the first 48 h. Secondary outcomes included tramadol consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial ultimately involved 71 patients. Results showed that the PNB group had significantly lower pain scores at 6, 12, and 18 h postoperatively compared with the LAI group (all P < 0.01), with no significant differences noted at 24 and 48 h. PNB group also had fewer patients requiring supplemental tramadol (5/36) than the LAI group (12/35) (P < 0.05) and experienced a delayed onset of pain (13.83 ± 11.21 h vs. 6.94 ± 2.88 h; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of anal sphincter spasms was lower in the PNB group (5/36) compared with the LAI group (12/35) (P < 0.04). QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively were significantly higher in the PNB group (119.11 ± 5.87) compared with the LAI group (112.03 ± 7.04) (P < 0.05), indicating a better early recovery experience. Patient satisfaction was higher in the PNB group (28/36 vs. 22/35, P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided PNB was more effective than LAI in pain control and recovery quality. It can be considered an effective method for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing PPH surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , Registration No. ChiCTR-IPR-15006427) on May 21<sup>st</sup>, 2015.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12271287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04953-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided pudendal nerve block (PNB) versus local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) in managing the pain.

Methods: This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial, 78 patients undergoing procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided PNB or LAI. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores using the visual analogue scale at multiple time points within the first 48 h. Secondary outcomes included tramadol consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores.

Results: The trial ultimately involved 71 patients. Results showed that the PNB group had significantly lower pain scores at 6, 12, and 18 h postoperatively compared with the LAI group (all P < 0.01), with no significant differences noted at 24 and 48 h. PNB group also had fewer patients requiring supplemental tramadol (5/36) than the LAI group (12/35) (P < 0.05) and experienced a delayed onset of pain (13.83 ± 11.21 h vs. 6.94 ± 2.88 h; P < 0.001). Furthermore, the incidence of anal sphincter spasms was lower in the PNB group (5/36) compared with the LAI group (12/35) (P < 0.04). QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively were significantly higher in the PNB group (119.11 ± 5.87) compared with the LAI group (112.03 ± 7.04) (P < 0.05), indicating a better early recovery experience. Patient satisfaction was higher in the PNB group (28/36 vs. 22/35, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided PNB was more effective than LAI in pain control and recovery quality. It can be considered an effective method for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing PPH surgery.

Trial registration: This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , Registration No. ChiCTR-IPR-15006427) on May 21st, 2015.

超声引导下阴部神经阻滞治疗脱垂和痔疮术后疼痛:一项随机双盲试验。
目的:评价超声引导下阴部神经阻滞(PNB)与局麻浸润(LAI)治疗疼痛的疗效。方法:这是一项前瞻性,随机,双盲试验,78例接受脱垂和痔疮(PPH)手术的患者随机分配接受超声引导的PNB或LAI。主要结局是术后48小时内多个时间点的视觉模拟评分。次要结局包括曲马多用量、术后恶心呕吐发生率和恢复质量-15 (QoR-15)评分。结果:该试验最终涉及71例患者。结果显示,PNB组术后6、12、18 h疼痛评分明显低于LAI组(均P)。结论:超声引导下PNB组在疼痛控制和恢复质量方面优于LAI组。它可以被认为是PPH手术患者术后疼痛管理的有效方法。试验注册:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(https://www.chictr.org.cn/,注册号:ChiCTR-IPR-15006427)于2015年5月21日发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信