PD-L1 expression predicts the efficacy of PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in treatment-naïve advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a pooled analysis of reconstructed individual patient-level data from two randomized trials.

IF 4.6 2区 生物学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcell.2025.1636288
Wei Zhou, Zeng-Zhi Cai, Zhuolin Fan, Xu Zheng, Yu-Tong Chen
{"title":"PD-L1 expression predicts the efficacy of PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in treatment-naïve advanced or metastatic gastric cancer: a pooled analysis of reconstructed individual patient-level data from two randomized trials.","authors":"Wei Zhou, Zeng-Zhi Cai, Zhuolin Fan, Xu Zheng, Yu-Tong Chen","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2025.1636288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy alone exhibits suboptimal efficacy in patients with treatment-naïve advanced gastric cancer (GC). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that combining Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 (PD-1) blockade with chemotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy alone. However, the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with low Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched for RCTs comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy to placebo plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in treatment-naïve advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients. Individual patient-level data (IPD) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were reconstructed. The KMSubtraction algorithm was employed to derive IPD for the PD-L1-low subgroup. Treatment effects in PD-L1-high and PD-L1-low subgroups were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models with shared frailty to account for between-study heterogeneity. Interaction tests were performed to assess differences in treatment effects between these subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis. A combined positive score (CPS) of 5 was selected as the cutoff for analysis, with CheckMate 649 and ORIENT-16 trials included. In the CPS<5 subgroup, OS (CheckMate 649: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.81-1.17, P = 0.758; ORIENT-16: HR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.68-1.31, P = 0.725) and PFS (CheckMate 649: HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.79-1.14, P = 0.580; ORIENT-16: HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.52-1.01, P = 0.055) did not significantly differ between patients receiving PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy and those receiving chemotherapy alone. Pooled analysis of reconstructed OS IPD from CheckMate 649 and ORIENT-16 (N = 2,231) revealed that PD-1 blockade significantly improved OS in the CPS≥5 subgroup (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.79, P < 0.001), but not in the CPS<5 subgroup (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.82-1.13, P = 0.643). Interaction tests showed a significantly attenuated treatment effect on OS in the CPS<5 subgroup compared to the CPS≥5 subgroup (Pinteraction = 0.002). Similar findings were observed in the pooled analysis of PFS data (Pinteraction = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of PD-1 inhibitors to first-line chemotherapy provides minimal benefit in patients with CPS<5. Therefore, PD-1 inhibitors should be individualized for this patient subset.</p>","PeriodicalId":12448,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1636288"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1636288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy alone exhibits suboptimal efficacy in patients with treatment-naïve advanced gastric cancer (GC). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that combining Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 (PD-1) blockade with chemotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) compared to chemotherapy alone. However, the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in patients with low Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remains unclear.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched for RCTs comparing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy to placebo plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in treatment-naïve advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients. Individual patient-level data (IPD) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were reconstructed. The KMSubtraction algorithm was employed to derive IPD for the PD-L1-low subgroup. Treatment effects in PD-L1-high and PD-L1-low subgroups were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models with shared frailty to account for between-study heterogeneity. Interaction tests were performed to assess differences in treatment effects between these subgroups.

Results: Nine RCTs were included in the qualitative analysis. A combined positive score (CPS) of 5 was selected as the cutoff for analysis, with CheckMate 649 and ORIENT-16 trials included. In the CPS<5 subgroup, OS (CheckMate 649: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.81-1.17, P = 0.758; ORIENT-16: HR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.68-1.31, P = 0.725) and PFS (CheckMate 649: HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.79-1.14, P = 0.580; ORIENT-16: HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.52-1.01, P = 0.055) did not significantly differ between patients receiving PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy and those receiving chemotherapy alone. Pooled analysis of reconstructed OS IPD from CheckMate 649 and ORIENT-16 (N = 2,231) revealed that PD-1 blockade significantly improved OS in the CPS≥5 subgroup (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.60-0.79, P < 0.001), but not in the CPS<5 subgroup (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.82-1.13, P = 0.643). Interaction tests showed a significantly attenuated treatment effect on OS in the CPS<5 subgroup compared to the CPS≥5 subgroup (Pinteraction = 0.002). Similar findings were observed in the pooled analysis of PFS data (Pinteraction = 0.011).

Conclusion: The addition of PD-1 inhibitors to first-line chemotherapy provides minimal benefit in patients with CPS<5. Therefore, PD-1 inhibitors should be individualized for this patient subset.

PD-L1表达预测PD-1阻断联合化疗与单独化疗在treatment-naïve晚期或转移性胃癌中的疗效:来自两项随机试验的重建个体患者水平数据的汇总分析。
背景:单独化疗对treatment-naïve晚期胃癌(GC)患者的疗效不理想。随机对照试验(rct)表明,与单独化疗相比,将程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1 (PD-1)阻断联合化疗可显著提高总生存率(OS)。然而,PD-1抑制剂对程序性细胞死亡配体1 (PD-L1)低表达患者的疗效尚不清楚。方法:检索电子数据库,比较treatment-naïve晚期胃或胃食管结腺癌患者PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂加化疗与安慰剂加化疗或单独化疗的rct。重建总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的个体患者水平数据(IPD)。采用km - subtraction算法推导PD-L1-low子组的IPD。pd - l1高亚组和pd - l1低亚组的治疗效果使用Cox比例风险模型进行评估,该模型具有共同的脆弱性,以解释研究间的异质性。进行相互作用试验以评估这些亚组之间治疗效果的差异。结果:定性分析纳入9项rct。综合阳性评分(CPS)为5作为分析的截止点,包括CheckMate 649和ORIENT-16试验。结论:在一线化疗中加入PD-1抑制剂对CPS患者的益处微乎其微
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
2531
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board. The journal welcomes submissions on a wide spectrum of cell and developmental biology, covering intracellular and extracellular dynamics, with sections focusing on signaling, adhesion, migration, cell death and survival and membrane trafficking. Additionally, the journal offers sections dedicated to the cutting edge of fundamental and translational research in molecular medicine and stem cell biology. With a collaborative, rigorous and transparent peer-review, the journal produces the highest scientific quality in both fundamental and applied research, and advanced article level metrics measure the real-time impact and influence of each publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信