Rib-indexed quantitative lung ultrasound versus chest X-ray for lung recruitment assessment in neonates with moderate-severe ARDS on surfactant therapy combined with prone position: a prospective observational study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Xia Ouyang, Li Fang, Huichen Yang, Qiongxia Ou, Haihong Zhang, Shaoru Huang, Fa Chen, Yanfang Fan, Wen Ling, Yunfeng Lin
{"title":"Rib-indexed quantitative lung ultrasound versus chest X-ray for lung recruitment assessment in neonates with moderate-severe ARDS on surfactant therapy combined with prone position: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Xia Ouyang, Li Fang, Huichen Yang, Qiongxia Ou, Haihong Zhang, Shaoru Huang, Fa Chen, Yanfang Fan, Wen Ling, Yunfeng Lin","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06313-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serial lung recruitment assessment in neonates with moderate-to-severe neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) is crucial. However, current methods involve ionizing radiation or invasiveness, which limits their serial use in neonates. This study evaluated the feasibility of rib-indexed quantitative lung ultrasound (LUS) as a radiation-free alternative for monitoring lung aeration in neonates with moderate-to-severe NARDS on surfactant therapy combined with prone position. A prospective observational study enrolled 35 term neonates with moderate-to-severe NARDS. Lung recruitment was assessed via anterior-posterior approach rib-indexed quantitative LUS and posteroanterior chest X-ray (CXR) before and 6 h after combined surfactant therapy and prone position. Following the intervention, it demonstrated a significant reduction in the LUS aeration score, from a pre-intervention median of 18 points (IQR 16, 22) to a post-intervention median of 15 points (IQR 12, 20) (P < 0.001). In contrast, the decrease in the CXR score (pre-intervention median 3 (IQR 3, 4) vs. post-intervention median 2 (IQR 2, 3)) did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.059). Posterior approach rib-indexed quantitative LUS showed high concordance with posteroanterior CXR in determining the rib level of the pulmonary-diaphragmatic interface (ICC > 0.95, kappa > 0.94, P < 0.001). No adverse events occurred during the LUS assessments.Conclusion: Posterior approach rib-indexed quantitative LUS is a reliable and non-invasive modality for real-time lung recruitment assessment in neonates with NARDS. It significantly detected improved lung aeration following surfactant therapy combined with prone position, whereas CXR failed to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement. Posterior approach rib-indexed quantitative LUS can also determine the rib level of the pulmonary-diaphragmatic interface, similarly to posteroanterior CXR. The superior sensitivity and safety of rib-indexed quantitative LUS offer a clinically valuable and innovative alternative for dynamic monitoring of lung recruitment in neonatal critical care. Future multi-centre studies should integrate CT validation to confirm broader applicability.Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300074652) on August 11, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 8","pages":"489"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06313-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serial lung recruitment assessment in neonates with moderate-to-severe neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS) is crucial. However, current methods involve ionizing radiation or invasiveness, which limits their serial use in neonates. This study evaluated the feasibility of rib-indexed quantitative lung ultrasound (LUS) as a radiation-free alternative for monitoring lung aeration in neonates with moderate-to-severe NARDS on surfactant therapy combined with prone position. A prospective observational study enrolled 35 term neonates with moderate-to-severe NARDS. Lung recruitment was assessed via anterior-posterior approach rib-indexed quantitative LUS and posteroanterior chest X-ray (CXR) before and 6 h after combined surfactant therapy and prone position. Following the intervention, it demonstrated a significant reduction in the LUS aeration score, from a pre-intervention median of 18 points (IQR 16, 22) to a post-intervention median of 15 points (IQR 12, 20) (P < 0.001). In contrast, the decrease in the CXR score (pre-intervention median 3 (IQR 3, 4) vs. post-intervention median 2 (IQR 2, 3)) did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.059). Posterior approach rib-indexed quantitative LUS showed high concordance with posteroanterior CXR in determining the rib level of the pulmonary-diaphragmatic interface (ICC > 0.95, kappa > 0.94, P < 0.001). No adverse events occurred during the LUS assessments.Conclusion: Posterior approach rib-indexed quantitative LUS is a reliable and non-invasive modality for real-time lung recruitment assessment in neonates with NARDS. It significantly detected improved lung aeration following surfactant therapy combined with prone position, whereas CXR failed to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement. Posterior approach rib-indexed quantitative LUS can also determine the rib level of the pulmonary-diaphragmatic interface, similarly to posteroanterior CXR. The superior sensitivity and safety of rib-indexed quantitative LUS offer a clinically valuable and innovative alternative for dynamic monitoring of lung recruitment in neonatal critical care. Future multi-centre studies should integrate CT validation to confirm broader applicability.Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300074652) on August 11, 2023.

肋指数定量肺超声对比胸部x线对表面活性剂联合俯卧位治疗的中重度ARDS新生儿肺功能补充的评估:一项前瞻性观察研究。
对中重度新生儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(NARDS)的新生儿进行连续肺功能恢复评估是至关重要的。然而,目前的方法涉及电离辐射或侵入性,这限制了它们在新生儿中的系列应用。本研究评估了肋指数定量肺超声(LUS)作为一种无辐射替代方法,用于监测表面活性剂联合俯卧位治疗的中重度NARDS新生儿肺通气的可行性。一项前瞻性观察研究纳入了35名中重度ards足月新生儿。在联合表面活性物质治疗前和治疗后6小时,通过前后入路肋骨指数定量LUS和前后胸部x线片(CXR)评估肺恢复情况。干预后,LUS通气评分显著降低,从干预前的中位数18分(IQR 16,22)降至干预后的中位数15分(IQR 12,20) (P 0.95, kappa > 0.94, P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信