Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Anxiety-Related Disorders: A Review of the Innovations, Challenges, and Clinical Implications.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Hyungjin Kim, Emily C Han, Phoebe B Muntz, Joshua Kemp
{"title":"Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Anxiety-Related Disorders: A Review of the Innovations, Challenges, and Clinical Implications.","authors":"Hyungjin Kim, Emily C Han, Phoebe B Muntz, Joshua Kemp","doi":"10.1007/s11920-025-01624-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review aims to examine the evolving literature on virtual reality (VR) technology in the treatment of anxiety-related disorders. We explore recent evidence across categories of anxiety-related disorders, focusing on the advantages and limitations of VR as a means of delivering exposure therapy. Finally, we propose recommendations for incorporating VR in current clinical practice and areas for future innovation.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>VR-based exposure therapy (VRET) is the dominant application of VR for anxiety-related disorders. Growing evidence shows that it is a well-accepted intervention that is superior to waitlist conditions, especially for phobias, social anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder; however, more investigation is needed into how VRET compares to conventional treatment modalities. Recent innovations include successful self-directed VRET programs, augmenting VRET with neuromodulation, and beginning exploration of therapeutic processes in the delivery of VRET. Notable limitations include limited comparison to standard treatment and lack of standardization of VRET protocol, which limits translatability. VRET shows promise in enhancing treatment models for anxiety-related disorders, but uniformization of software and delivery protocols will be a key next step.</p>","PeriodicalId":11057,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-025-01624-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aims to examine the evolving literature on virtual reality (VR) technology in the treatment of anxiety-related disorders. We explore recent evidence across categories of anxiety-related disorders, focusing on the advantages and limitations of VR as a means of delivering exposure therapy. Finally, we propose recommendations for incorporating VR in current clinical practice and areas for future innovation.

Recent findings: VR-based exposure therapy (VRET) is the dominant application of VR for anxiety-related disorders. Growing evidence shows that it is a well-accepted intervention that is superior to waitlist conditions, especially for phobias, social anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder; however, more investigation is needed into how VRET compares to conventional treatment modalities. Recent innovations include successful self-directed VRET programs, augmenting VRET with neuromodulation, and beginning exploration of therapeutic processes in the delivery of VRET. Notable limitations include limited comparison to standard treatment and lack of standardization of VRET protocol, which limits translatability. VRET shows promise in enhancing treatment models for anxiety-related disorders, but uniformization of software and delivery protocols will be a key next step.

虚拟现实在焦虑相关障碍治疗中的应用:创新、挑战和临床意义综述。
综述目的:本综述旨在回顾虚拟现实(VR)技术在治疗焦虑相关障碍方面的最新文献。我们探索了焦虑相关障碍类别的最新证据,重点关注VR作为一种提供暴露疗法的手段的优点和局限性。最后,我们提出了将VR纳入当前临床实践和未来创新领域的建议。最新发现:基于虚拟现实的暴露疗法(VRET)是虚拟现实治疗焦虑相关障碍的主要应用。越来越多的证据表明,这是一种被广泛接受的干预措施,优于等候名单条件,特别是对于恐惧症,社交焦虑和创伤后应激障碍;然而,VRET与传统治疗方式的比较需要更多的调查。最近的创新包括成功的自主VRET计划,通过神经调节增强VRET,以及开始探索VRET的治疗过程。值得注意的限制包括与标准处理的有限比较和VRET协议缺乏标准化,这限制了可翻译性。VRET有望增强焦虑相关障碍的治疗模式,但软件和交付协议的统一将是下一步的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in psychiatry. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by psychiatric disorders. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anxiety, medicopsychiatric disorders, and schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信