Laith Alhuneafat, Fares Ghanem, Omar Obeidat, Anas Alzyoud, Abdel Latif Ma'aita, Mustafa Ajam, Ahmed M Altibi
{"title":"Short-term outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: insights from nationwide readmission analysis.","authors":"Laith Alhuneafat, Fares Ghanem, Omar Obeidat, Anas Alzyoud, Abdel Latif Ma'aita, Mustafa Ajam, Ahmed M Altibi","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01173-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) TAVI outcomes for patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and severe aortic stenosis are uncertain due to their exclusion from major clinical trials. We analyzed TAVI patients in the United States using data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2019) identified using ICD-10 codes. We established matched cohorts of BAV and trileaflet aortic valve (TAV) patients using propensity-score matching (PSM). Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Out of 233,683 TAVI patients identified, 3169 (1.4%) had BAV. BAV patients were younger with fewer comorbidities. After PSM, 2,840 pairs were analyzed. Compared to TAV patients, TAVI in BAV patients showed comparable in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs. 2.0%; OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.36-1.04; p = 0.07) and 30-day readmission rates (10.0% vs. 12.3%; OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.60-1.03; p = 0.08), with lower 30-day mortality rates (0.88% vs. 1.96%; OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.84; p = 0.01). Post-TAVI in-hospital complications rates, including stroke, acute kidney injury, pacemaker need, and others, were similar between BAV and TAV patients. TAVI in BAV shows acceptable safety compared to TAV, but further randomized trials are needed to establish long-term outcomes and durability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01173-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) TAVI outcomes for patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and severe aortic stenosis are uncertain due to their exclusion from major clinical trials. We analyzed TAVI patients in the United States using data from the Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2019) identified using ICD-10 codes. We established matched cohorts of BAV and trileaflet aortic valve (TAV) patients using propensity-score matching (PSM). Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. Out of 233,683 TAVI patients identified, 3169 (1.4%) had BAV. BAV patients were younger with fewer comorbidities. After PSM, 2,840 pairs were analyzed. Compared to TAV patients, TAVI in BAV patients showed comparable in-hospital mortality (1.2% vs. 2.0%; OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.36-1.04; p = 0.07) and 30-day readmission rates (10.0% vs. 12.3%; OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.60-1.03; p = 0.08), with lower 30-day mortality rates (0.88% vs. 1.96%; OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.23-0.84; p = 0.01). Post-TAVI in-hospital complications rates, including stroke, acute kidney injury, pacemaker need, and others, were similar between BAV and TAV patients. TAVI in BAV shows acceptable safety compared to TAV, but further randomized trials are needed to establish long-term outcomes and durability.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)对于患有双尖瓣主动脉瓣(BAV)和严重主动脉瓣狭窄的患者,TAVI的治疗结果不确定,因为他们被排除在主要的临床试验之外。我们使用使用ICD-10代码识别的全国再入院数据库(2016-2019)的数据分析了美国的TAVI患者。我们使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)建立了BAV和三瓣主动脉瓣(TAV)患者的匹配队列。主要结局是住院死亡率、30天死亡率和30天再入院率。在确定的233,683例TAVI患者中,3169例(1.4%)患有BAV。BAV患者较年轻,合并症较少。经PSM分析2840对。与TAV患者相比,BAV患者的TAVI显示出相当的住院死亡率(1.2% vs. 2.0%;或0.62;95% ci 0.36-1.04;P = 0.07)和30天再入院率(10.0% vs. 12.3%;或0.79;95% ci 0.60-1.03;P = 0.08), 30天死亡率较低(0.88% vs. 1.96%;或0.44;95% ci 0.23-0.84;p = 0.01)。tavi后的住院并发症发生率,包括中风、急性肾损伤、起搏器需求等,在BAV和TAV患者之间相似。与TAV相比,BAV中的TAVI显示出可接受的安全性,但需要进一步的随机试验来确定长期结果和持久性。
期刊介绍:
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.