Management of periodontitis by three different approaches to non-surgical periodontal debridement- a randomized comparative clinical study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Kodikara Mudiyanselage Chathurika Padmakumari, Uthpala Muhandiramge Gunasekara, Ranjith Pallegama, Aruni Tilakaratne
{"title":"Management of periodontitis by three different approaches to non-surgical periodontal debridement- a randomized comparative clinical study.","authors":"Kodikara Mudiyanselage Chathurika Padmakumari, Uthpala Muhandiramge Gunasekara, Ranjith Pallegama, Aruni Tilakaratne","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06595-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) is the cornerstone of periodontitis management. This comparative clinical study evaluates the effectiveness of three different non-surgical treatment approaches in three treatment groups, namely, Quadrant-wise Scaling and Root Surface Debridement (Q-Sc + RSD), Full-mouth Disinfection (FMDis), and Full-mouth Debridement (FMDeb).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 patients with generalised stage II and III periodontitis were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Plaque scores (PS), bleeding scores (BS) and probing pocket depths (PD) were recorded at baseline and post-NSPT. Data were analyzed to compare the changes in PS, BS, and PD distribution at baseline and post-NSPT in all three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three treatment approaches resulted in statistically significant reductions in PS, BS, and PD distribution compared to baseline. However, FMDeb and FMDis protocols demonstrated greater reductions in BS and PD distribution compared to the Q-Sc + RSD protocol. Remarkably low BS were observed in all three study groups at the post-treatment evaluation, with statistically significant differences compared to their respective pre-treatment BS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All three treatment approaches were effective in reducing PS, BS, and PD in patients with periodontitis, while FMDeb and FMDis protocols demonstrated superior effectiveness in terms of reduction of BS and PD, compared to the Q-Sc + RSD protocol. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods may be warranted to confirm these findings and evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of these different debridement approaches of NSPT.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial no: </strong>The UK's Clinical Study Registry ISRCTN13350022, 28/05/2025, retrospectively registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06595-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) is the cornerstone of periodontitis management. This comparative clinical study evaluates the effectiveness of three different non-surgical treatment approaches in three treatment groups, namely, Quadrant-wise Scaling and Root Surface Debridement (Q-Sc + RSD), Full-mouth Disinfection (FMDis), and Full-mouth Debridement (FMDeb).

Methods: A total of 45 patients with generalised stage II and III periodontitis were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Plaque scores (PS), bleeding scores (BS) and probing pocket depths (PD) were recorded at baseline and post-NSPT. Data were analyzed to compare the changes in PS, BS, and PD distribution at baseline and post-NSPT in all three groups.

Results: All three treatment approaches resulted in statistically significant reductions in PS, BS, and PD distribution compared to baseline. However, FMDeb and FMDis protocols demonstrated greater reductions in BS and PD distribution compared to the Q-Sc + RSD protocol. Remarkably low BS were observed in all three study groups at the post-treatment evaluation, with statistically significant differences compared to their respective pre-treatment BS.

Conclusions: All three treatment approaches were effective in reducing PS, BS, and PD in patients with periodontitis, while FMDeb and FMDis protocols demonstrated superior effectiveness in terms of reduction of BS and PD, compared to the Q-Sc + RSD protocol. Further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods may be warranted to confirm these findings and evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of these different debridement approaches of NSPT.

Clinical trial no: The UK's Clinical Study Registry ISRCTN13350022, 28/05/2025, retrospectively registered.

通过三种不同的非手术牙周清创方法治疗牙周炎-一项随机比较临床研究。
背景:非手术牙周治疗(NSPT)是牙周炎治疗的基石。本比较临床研究评估了三种不同的非手术治疗方法在三个治疗组中的有效性,即象限刮除和根表面清创(Q-Sc + RSD)、全口消毒(FMDis)和全口清创(FMDeb)。方法:45例广泛性II期和III期牙周炎患者随机分为三个治疗组。在基线和nspt后记录斑块评分(PS)、出血评分(BS)和探查口袋深度(PD)。分析数据,比较三组患者在基线和nspt后PS、BS和PD分布的变化。结果:与基线相比,所有三种治疗方法均显著降低了PS、BS和PD分布。然而,与Q-Sc + RSD方案相比,FMDeb和FMDis方案显示出更大的BS和PD分布减少。在治疗后评估中,三个研究组的BS都很低,与各自的治疗前BS相比,差异有统计学意义。结论:所有三种治疗方法均可有效降低牙周炎患者的PS、BS和PD,而FMDeb和FMDis方案在降低BS和PD方面的效果优于Q-Sc + RSD方案。进一步的研究可能需要更大的样本量和更长的随访时间来证实这些发现,并评估这些不同的NSPT清创方法的长期临床结果。临床试验编号:英国临床研究注册中心ISRCTN13350022, 28/05/2025,回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信