Evaluation of Microgap Size and Microbial Microleakage at the Implant Fixture-Abutment Interface in Original and Compatible Abutments.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
BioMed Research International Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/bmri/2530986
Reza Sharifi, Tahereh Ghaffari, Shima Ghasemi, Hossein Samadi Kafil
{"title":"Evaluation of Microgap Size and Microbial Microleakage at the Implant Fixture-Abutment Interface in Original and Compatible Abutments.","authors":"Reza Sharifi, Tahereh Ghaffari, Shima Ghasemi, Hossein Samadi Kafil","doi":"10.1155/bmri/2530986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The microgap between implant and abutment can lead to mechanical and biological problems such as abutment screw breakage or peri-implantitis. The utilization of compatible abutments in place of the original components results in a decrease in costs and provides dentists with a broader selection of abutment options. The purpose of this study was to compare bacterial microleakage and microgap in the Korean Osstem, Dio, and Cis systems, whose regular abutments are compatible with each other. <b>Method:</b> Twelve implant abutments were used in this study, each four from Osstem (Seoul, South Korea), Dio (Seoul, South Korea), and Cis (Medimecca, Seoul, South Korea), all measuring 7 mm in length, 4.5 mm in diameter, and 3 mm in height. These were attached to Osstem fixtures of regular size (4.5 mm diameter and 11.5 mm length), which were contaminated with a bacterial suspension. Bacterial contamination was assessed at 5, 24, and 48 h, while microgap size was measured at four points using an electron microscope. Statistical analyses, including one-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis tests, were performed by SPSS 17 to evaluate differences in microgap and microleakage among the groups. <b>Results:</b> There is a statistically significant difference between the mean microgap in the Dio group and the other two groups. The mean microgap in the Dio group was higher than both of the other groups (<i>p</i> value < 0.001). There is no statistically significant difference between the mean microgap in the Osstem group and its mean in the Cis group (<i>p</i> value > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean number of colonies (CFU) in the study groups at any of the four evaluation times (<i>p</i> value > 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> Considering the limitations of this study, it can be inferred that the Cis-compatible abutment is also applicable for use with the Osstem fixtures.</p>","PeriodicalId":9007,"journal":{"name":"BioMed Research International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2530986"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267965/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMed Research International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/bmri/2530986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The microgap between implant and abutment can lead to mechanical and biological problems such as abutment screw breakage or peri-implantitis. The utilization of compatible abutments in place of the original components results in a decrease in costs and provides dentists with a broader selection of abutment options. The purpose of this study was to compare bacterial microleakage and microgap in the Korean Osstem, Dio, and Cis systems, whose regular abutments are compatible with each other. Method: Twelve implant abutments were used in this study, each four from Osstem (Seoul, South Korea), Dio (Seoul, South Korea), and Cis (Medimecca, Seoul, South Korea), all measuring 7 mm in length, 4.5 mm in diameter, and 3 mm in height. These were attached to Osstem fixtures of regular size (4.5 mm diameter and 11.5 mm length), which were contaminated with a bacterial suspension. Bacterial contamination was assessed at 5, 24, and 48 h, while microgap size was measured at four points using an electron microscope. Statistical analyses, including one-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis tests, were performed by SPSS 17 to evaluate differences in microgap and microleakage among the groups. Results: There is a statistically significant difference between the mean microgap in the Dio group and the other two groups. The mean microgap in the Dio group was higher than both of the other groups (p value < 0.001). There is no statistically significant difference between the mean microgap in the Osstem group and its mean in the Cis group (p value > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean number of colonies (CFU) in the study groups at any of the four evaluation times (p value > 0.05). Conclusion: Considering the limitations of this study, it can be inferred that the Cis-compatible abutment is also applicable for use with the Osstem fixtures.

原基牙与兼容基牙种植体-基牙界面微间隙大小及微生物微渗漏的评价。
种植体与基牙之间的微间隙会导致机械和生物问题,如基牙螺钉断裂或种植体周围炎。使用兼容的基台代替原来的部件可以降低成本,并为牙医提供更广泛的基台选择。本研究的目的是比较韩国系统、Dio系统和Cis系统的细菌微渗漏和微间隙,它们的规则基台相互兼容。方法:本研究使用12个种植基台,每4个来自Osstem (Seoul, South Korea)、Dio (Seoul, South Korea)和Cis (medi麦加,Seoul, South Korea),长7mm,直径4.5 mm,高3mm。这些被附着在常规尺寸(直径4.5毫米,长度11.5毫米)的系统装置上,该装置被细菌悬浮液污染。在5、24和48小时评估细菌污染,同时使用电子显微镜在四个点测量微间隙大小。采用SPSS 17进行统计分析,包括单因素方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验,以评估各组间微间隙和微渗漏的差异。结果:Dio组平均微间隙与其他两组比较,差异有统计学意义。Dio组的平均微间隙高于其他两组(p值p值bb0 0.05)。各组平均菌落数(CFU)在4次评估中均无统计学差异(p值为0.05)。结论:考虑到本研究的局限性,可以推断Cis-compatible基台也适用于与Osstem治具一起使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMed Research International
BioMed Research International BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1942
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMed Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in life sciences and medicine. The journal is divided into 55 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信