Capillary Blood Self-Sampling for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Usability Study of the True Dose® Kit.

IF 2.6 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
BioMed Research International Pub Date : 2025-07-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/bmri/9973081
Marie-Therése Crafoord, Elham Hedayati, Aina Johnsson
{"title":"Capillary Blood Self-Sampling for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Mixed-Methods Usability Study of the True Dose<sup>®</sup> Kit.","authors":"Marie-Therése Crafoord, Elham Hedayati, Aina Johnsson","doi":"10.1155/bmri/9973081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study evaluates the usability in accordance with EN 62366 of the True Dose kit for capillary blood self-sampling, to be used to analyze, specify, design, verify, and validate usability as it relates to the safety of medical devices focusing on user performance, experience, and user confidence through a mixed-methods approach. The usability engineering process is needed to fulfill user interface design requirements as part of product development at True Dose kit. <b>Methods:</b> The study employed a convergent parallel design, integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Twenty-five participants, recruited through convenience sampling, used the True Dose kit to perform capillary blood self-sampling. Quantitative data were collected using three key performance metrics-collection of sufficient blood volume, absence of air bubbles, and duration of the self-sampling process-along with two questionnaires, the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Test Feedback Questionnaire (TFQ), to comprehensively assess user performance and experience. In contrast, qualitative data were obtained from interviews and free-text responses. The integration of findings highlighted areas of convergence and divergence between the quantitative and qualitative data. <b>Results:</b> The overall SUS score was 82.70, indicating high usability. However, participants reported challenges with the complexity of instructions and stress associated with blood flow management. Qualitative insights revealed a preference for simplified visual guidance and highlighted the need for precise feedback mechanisms to ensure the correct execution of sampling steps. Despite these challenges, 92% of participants collected the required blood sample, with a median self-sampling duration of 10.42 min. <b>Conclusion:</b> The True Dose kit demonstrates high usability potential, but improvements in instructional design and stress management are needed to enhance user experience and ensure consistent performance. <b>Trial Registration:</b> EUCT Number: 2024-514818-12-00.</p>","PeriodicalId":9007,"journal":{"name":"BioMed Research International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"9973081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12267959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMed Research International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/bmri/9973081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the usability in accordance with EN 62366 of the True Dose kit for capillary blood self-sampling, to be used to analyze, specify, design, verify, and validate usability as it relates to the safety of medical devices focusing on user performance, experience, and user confidence through a mixed-methods approach. The usability engineering process is needed to fulfill user interface design requirements as part of product development at True Dose kit. Methods: The study employed a convergent parallel design, integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Twenty-five participants, recruited through convenience sampling, used the True Dose kit to perform capillary blood self-sampling. Quantitative data were collected using three key performance metrics-collection of sufficient blood volume, absence of air bubbles, and duration of the self-sampling process-along with two questionnaires, the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the Test Feedback Questionnaire (TFQ), to comprehensively assess user performance and experience. In contrast, qualitative data were obtained from interviews and free-text responses. The integration of findings highlighted areas of convergence and divergence between the quantitative and qualitative data. Results: The overall SUS score was 82.70, indicating high usability. However, participants reported challenges with the complexity of instructions and stress associated with blood flow management. Qualitative insights revealed a preference for simplified visual guidance and highlighted the need for precise feedback mechanisms to ensure the correct execution of sampling steps. Despite these challenges, 92% of participants collected the required blood sample, with a median self-sampling duration of 10.42 min. Conclusion: The True Dose kit demonstrates high usability potential, but improvements in instructional design and stress management are needed to enhance user experience and ensure consistent performance. Trial Registration: EUCT Number: 2024-514818-12-00.

用于治疗药物监测的毛细管血液自采样:真实剂量®试剂盒的混合方法可用性研究。
目的:本研究根据EN 62366评估毛细管血液自采样真剂量试剂盒的可用性,用于分析、指定、设计、验证和验证可用性,因为它涉及医疗器械的安全性,重点是用户性能、体验和用户信心,通过混合方法方法。作为True Dose kit产品开发的一部分,可用性工程过程需要满足用户界面设计要求。方法:采用收敛平行设计,定量与定性相结合。通过方便抽样招募的25名参与者使用真剂量试剂盒进行毛细管血液自采样。定量数据收集使用三个关键性能指标-收集足够的血容量,没有气泡,和自采样过程的持续时间-以及两份问卷,系统可用性量表(SUS)和测试反馈问卷(TFQ),以全面评估用户的性能和体验。相比之下,定性数据是从访谈和自由文本回复中获得的。调查结果的综合突出了数量和质量数据之间的趋同和分歧领域。结果:SUS总分为82.70分,可用性较高。然而,参与者报告了与血流管理相关的指令复杂性和压力的挑战。定性分析揭示了对简化视觉引导的偏好,并强调了精确反馈机制的必要性,以确保正确执行采样步骤。尽管存在这些挑战,92%的参与者采集了所需的血液样本,平均自我采样时间为10.42分钟。结论:真剂量试剂盒具有很高的可用性潜力,但需要在教学设计和压力管理方面进行改进,以增强用户体验并确保一致的性能。试验报名:EUCT号:2024-514818-12-00。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioMed Research International
BioMed Research International BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1942
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMed Research International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in life sciences and medicine. The journal is divided into 55 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信