Relational Impact of Emotional Stimuli on Putative Mirror Neuron Activity: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.

IF 1 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-18 DOI:10.32598/bcn.2023.1060.2
Atefeh Zabihi, Mohammad-Ali Mazaheri, Reza Rostami, Mansoureh Sadat Sadeghi, Narjes Hosein-Zadehbahreini, Amir-Homayoun Hallajian, Vahid Nejati
{"title":"Relational Impact of Emotional Stimuli on Putative Mirror Neuron Activity: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.","authors":"Atefeh Zabihi, Mohammad-Ali Mazaheri, Reza Rostami, Mansoureh Sadat Sadeghi, Narjes Hosein-Zadehbahreini, Amir-Homayoun Hallajian, Vahid Nejati","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2023.1060.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mirror neurons' function is thought to be enhanced by emotion processing. There is some evidence that the valence of an emotional presentation (positive or negative) can influence subsequent mirror neuron activity differently. Additionally, mirror neurons are claimed to provide the mechanism necessary for the embodied simulation of others' mental states. Therefore, there is an assumption that relational emotion processing may manipulate mirror neuron functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (PMC) and electromyography recording from contralateral hand muscles, 20 participants viewed videos of either a static hand or a transitive hand action preceded by either neutral or general (negative and positive) and relational (negative and positive) images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Corticospinal excitability facilitation during action observation was significantly greater following the positive general than negative general emotion stimuli. Regarding relational emotions, we observed an increased mirror neuron system (MNS) activity following relational negative compared to relational positive, relational negative compared to general negative, and general positive compared to relational positive stimuli.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This finding supports the assumption that relational content interferes with mentalizing capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8701,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"16 Spec","pages":"193-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2023.1060.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mirror neurons' function is thought to be enhanced by emotion processing. There is some evidence that the valence of an emotional presentation (positive or negative) can influence subsequent mirror neuron activity differently. Additionally, mirror neurons are claimed to provide the mechanism necessary for the embodied simulation of others' mental states. Therefore, there is an assumption that relational emotion processing may manipulate mirror neuron functions.

Methods: Via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (PMC) and electromyography recording from contralateral hand muscles, 20 participants viewed videos of either a static hand or a transitive hand action preceded by either neutral or general (negative and positive) and relational (negative and positive) images.

Results: Corticospinal excitability facilitation during action observation was significantly greater following the positive general than negative general emotion stimuli. Regarding relational emotions, we observed an increased mirror neuron system (MNS) activity following relational negative compared to relational positive, relational negative compared to general negative, and general positive compared to relational positive stimuli.

Conclusion: This finding supports the assumption that relational content interferes with mentalizing capacity.

情绪刺激对假定镜像神经元活动的相关影响:经颅磁刺激研究。
镜像神经元的功能被认为是通过情绪处理而增强的。有证据表明,情绪表现的效价(积极或消极)会对随后的镜像神经元活动产生不同的影响。此外,镜像神经元被认为提供了对他人心理状态的具身模拟所必需的机制。因此,有一种假设认为,关系情绪处理可能操纵镜像神经元的功能。方法:通过对初级运动皮层(PMC)的经颅磁刺激(TMS)和对侧手部肌肉的肌电记录,20名参与者观看了静态手或传递手动作的视频,视频前有中性或一般(消极和积极)和相关(消极和积极)图像。结果:一般情绪刺激下,动作观察时皮质脊髓兴奋性促进显著高于一般情绪刺激。关于关系情绪,我们观察到在关系消极刺激相比于关系积极刺激,关系消极刺激相比于一般消极刺激,一般积极刺激相比于关系积极刺激后,镜像神经元系统(MNS)的活动增加。结论:这一发现支持了关系内容干扰心智化能力的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: BCN is an international multidisciplinary journal that publishes editorials, original full-length research articles, short communications, reviews, methodological papers, commentaries, perspectives and “news and reports” in the broad fields of developmental, molecular, cellular, system, computational, behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. No area in the neural related sciences is excluded from consideration, although priority is given to studies that provide applied insights into the functioning of the nervous system. BCN aims to advance our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system in health and disease, thereby improving the diagnosis and treatment of neural-related disorders. Manuscripts submitted to BCN should describe novel results generated by experiments that were guided by clearly defined aims or hypotheses. BCN aims to provide serious ties in interdisciplinary communication, accessibility to a broad readership inside Iran and the region and also in all other international academic sites, effective peer review process, and independence from all possible non-scientific interests. BCN also tries to empower national, regional and international collaborative networks in the field of neuroscience in Iran, Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa and to be the voice of the Iranian and regional neuroscience community in the world of neuroscientists. In this way, the journal encourages submission of editorials, review papers, commentaries, methodological notes and perspectives that address this scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信