{"title":"Relational Impact of Emotional Stimuli on Putative Mirror Neuron Activity: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.","authors":"Atefeh Zabihi, Mohammad-Ali Mazaheri, Reza Rostami, Mansoureh Sadat Sadeghi, Narjes Hosein-Zadehbahreini, Amir-Homayoun Hallajian, Vahid Nejati","doi":"10.32598/bcn.2023.1060.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mirror neurons' function is thought to be enhanced by emotion processing. There is some evidence that the valence of an emotional presentation (positive or negative) can influence subsequent mirror neuron activity differently. Additionally, mirror neurons are claimed to provide the mechanism necessary for the embodied simulation of others' mental states. Therefore, there is an assumption that relational emotion processing may manipulate mirror neuron functions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (PMC) and electromyography recording from contralateral hand muscles, 20 participants viewed videos of either a static hand or a transitive hand action preceded by either neutral or general (negative and positive) and relational (negative and positive) images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Corticospinal excitability facilitation during action observation was significantly greater following the positive general than negative general emotion stimuli. Regarding relational emotions, we observed an increased mirror neuron system (MNS) activity following relational negative compared to relational positive, relational negative compared to general negative, and general positive compared to relational positive stimuli.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This finding supports the assumption that relational content interferes with mentalizing capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8701,"journal":{"name":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"16 Spec","pages":"193-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265428/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/bcn.2023.1060.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Mirror neurons' function is thought to be enhanced by emotion processing. There is some evidence that the valence of an emotional presentation (positive or negative) can influence subsequent mirror neuron activity differently. Additionally, mirror neurons are claimed to provide the mechanism necessary for the embodied simulation of others' mental states. Therefore, there is an assumption that relational emotion processing may manipulate mirror neuron functions.
Methods: Via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the primary motor cortex (PMC) and electromyography recording from contralateral hand muscles, 20 participants viewed videos of either a static hand or a transitive hand action preceded by either neutral or general (negative and positive) and relational (negative and positive) images.
Results: Corticospinal excitability facilitation during action observation was significantly greater following the positive general than negative general emotion stimuli. Regarding relational emotions, we observed an increased mirror neuron system (MNS) activity following relational negative compared to relational positive, relational negative compared to general negative, and general positive compared to relational positive stimuli.
Conclusion: This finding supports the assumption that relational content interferes with mentalizing capacity.
期刊介绍:
BCN is an international multidisciplinary journal that publishes editorials, original full-length research articles, short communications, reviews, methodological papers, commentaries, perspectives and “news and reports” in the broad fields of developmental, molecular, cellular, system, computational, behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. No area in the neural related sciences is excluded from consideration, although priority is given to studies that provide applied insights into the functioning of the nervous system. BCN aims to advance our understanding of organization and function of the nervous system in health and disease, thereby improving the diagnosis and treatment of neural-related disorders. Manuscripts submitted to BCN should describe novel results generated by experiments that were guided by clearly defined aims or hypotheses. BCN aims to provide serious ties in interdisciplinary communication, accessibility to a broad readership inside Iran and the region and also in all other international academic sites, effective peer review process, and independence from all possible non-scientific interests. BCN also tries to empower national, regional and international collaborative networks in the field of neuroscience in Iran, Middle East, Central Asia and North Africa and to be the voice of the Iranian and regional neuroscience community in the world of neuroscientists. In this way, the journal encourages submission of editorials, review papers, commentaries, methodological notes and perspectives that address this scope.