Lack of Survival Benefit with Immunotherapy in Combination with Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Pathologic Stage II-IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17766-z
Natasha Venugopal, Jorge Raul Vazquez-Urrutia, Junjia Zhu, Asato Hashinokuchi, Shinkichi Takamori, Takefumi Komiya
{"title":"Lack of Survival Benefit with Immunotherapy in Combination with Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Pathologic Stage II-IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Natasha Venugopal, Jorge Raul Vazquez-Urrutia, Junjia Zhu, Asato Hashinokuchi, Shinkichi Takamori, Takefumi Komiya","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17766-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, atezolizumab and pembrolizumab are standard management for curatively resected stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) owing to prior studies showing that they improve disease-free survival. However, these studies excluded the planned use of adjuvant radiation therapy. Survival benefit of adding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation (CT+RT) has not been fully assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified and, based on therapy received, stratified 4,934 cases involving patients undergoing complete resection with pathologic stage II-IIIB NSCLC who survived at least 1 month without neoadjuvant CT or RT and subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier methods and multi-variable Cox regression models were used for survival analysis. Propensity score matching was performed to compare adjuvant CT+RT+ICI vs. CT+RT. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The addition of ICI to adjuvant CT improved overall survival (OS) (2-year OS 90.1% vs. 86%, univariate and multivariate hazard ratios [HRs] 0.72 and 0.66, p = 0.0024 and 0.0003, respectively). However, no OS benefit was seen in those who received adjuvant CT+RT (2-year OS 77.8% vs. 76.1%, univariate and multivariate HRs 0.83 and 0.85, p = 0.3677 and 0.4369, respectively). Propensity score matching analysis showed similar results (2-year OS 77.8% vs. 79.6%, univariate and multivariate HRs 0.91 and 0.87, p = 0.7143 and 0.5868, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our retrospective real-world analysis suggests that adjuvant ICIs do not improve survival outcome when combined with adjuvant CT+RT. This result mirrors recent negative trials studying ICI+CT+RT in unresectable stage III NSCLC and limited-stage SCLC. Further investigations are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"7883-7890"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17766-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, atezolizumab and pembrolizumab are standard management for curatively resected stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) owing to prior studies showing that they improve disease-free survival. However, these studies excluded the planned use of adjuvant radiation therapy. Survival benefit of adding immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation (CT+RT) has not been fully assessed.

Methods: Using National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified and, based on therapy received, stratified 4,934 cases involving patients undergoing complete resection with pathologic stage II-IIIB NSCLC who survived at least 1 month without neoadjuvant CT or RT and subsequently received adjuvant chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier methods and multi-variable Cox regression models were used for survival analysis. Propensity score matching was performed to compare adjuvant CT+RT+ICI vs. CT+RT. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The addition of ICI to adjuvant CT improved overall survival (OS) (2-year OS 90.1% vs. 86%, univariate and multivariate hazard ratios [HRs] 0.72 and 0.66, p = 0.0024 and 0.0003, respectively). However, no OS benefit was seen in those who received adjuvant CT+RT (2-year OS 77.8% vs. 76.1%, univariate and multivariate HRs 0.83 and 0.85, p = 0.3677 and 0.4369, respectively). Propensity score matching analysis showed similar results (2-year OS 77.8% vs. 79.6%, univariate and multivariate HRs 0.91 and 0.87, p = 0.7143 and 0.5868, respectively).

Conclusions: Our retrospective real-world analysis suggests that adjuvant ICIs do not improve survival outcome when combined with adjuvant CT+RT. This result mirrors recent negative trials studying ICI+CT+RT in unresectable stage III NSCLC and limited-stage SCLC. Further investigations are warranted.

病理II-IIIB期非小细胞肺癌免疫治疗联合辅助放化疗缺乏生存获益
背景:目前,atezolizumab和pembrolizumab是治疗切除的II-III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的标准治疗方法,因为先前的研究表明它们可以提高无病生存率。然而,这些研究排除了计划使用辅助放射治疗。在接受辅助放化疗(CT+RT)的患者中添加免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的生存获益尚未得到充分评估。方法:使用国家癌症数据库(NCDB),我们确定并根据所接受的治疗对4934例接受完全切除的病理II-IIIB期NSCLC患者进行分层,这些患者在没有新辅助CT或RT的情况下存活了至少1个月,随后接受了辅助化疗。生存率分析采用Kaplan-Meier法和多变量Cox回归模型。采用倾向评分匹配比较辅助CT+RT+ICI与CT+RT。结果的p值:在辅助CT上增加ICI可提高总生存率(OS)(2年OS 90.1% vs. 86%,单因素和多因素风险比[hr]分别为0.72和0.66,p = 0.0024和0.0003)。然而,接受辅助CT+RT的患者没有OS获益(2年OS 77.8% vs 76.1%,单因素和多因素hr分别为0.83和0.85,p = 0.3677和0.4369)。倾向评分匹配分析结果相似(2年OS 77.8% vs 79.6%,单因素和多因素hr分别为0.91和0.87,p = 0.7143和0.5868)。结论:我们的回顾性现实世界分析表明,当辅助ICIs与辅助CT+RT联合使用时,并不能改善生存结果。这一结果反映了最近ICI+CT+RT在不可切除的III期NSCLC和有限期SCLC中的阴性试验。有必要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信