The Effect of Suture Materials on the Development of Capsular Contracture in Silicone Implants.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Emrah Işıktekin, Burçin Acuner, Merve Torun Karadere, Banu Doğan Gün, Ahmet Eksal Kargı
{"title":"The Effect of Suture Materials on the Development of Capsular Contracture in Silicone Implants.","authors":"Emrah Işıktekin, Burçin Acuner, Merve Torun Karadere, Banu Doğan Gün, Ahmet Eksal Kargı","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Capsular contracture leads to undesirable outcomes when using breast prostheses. While implant characteristics and surgical techniques have been studied extensively, the impact of suture materials on capsule formation remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effects of different suture materials on capsular contracture development in a rat model with silicone implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The rats were divided into five groups. Silicone measuring 1.0x1.0x0.5 cm was implanted in the thoracodorsal region. The incisions were closed using poly(glycolide-co-lactide), polypropylene, polydioxanone, glycomer 631, and polyglycolide-co-caprolactone in Groups 1 to 5, respectively. The capsule surrounding the implant was examined in histopathological specimens collected during the 12th week after implantation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Capsule thickness varied significantly among groups, with Group 1 exhibiting the highest mean thickness and Group 4 the lowest. Inflammation levels also differed, with Group 3 showing the highest proportion of moderate to severe inflammation, whereas Group 4 primarily exhibited mild inflammation. The type of inflammation varied, with Groups 3, 4, and 5 predominantly showing mixed-type inflammation. The presence of foreign body giant cells was highest in Groups 1 and 2, while Group 4 had the lowest. No significant differences were observed in hemosiderin presence, collagen organization, or myofibroblast density.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of the type and degree of inflammation, presence of foreign body giant cells, and average capsule thickness, Group 4 (glycomer 631) suture had the best overall performance, and Group 1 (poly(glycolide-co-lactide) performed the worst. Glycomer 631 sutures may reduce capsular contracture in silicone implant surgeries compared to other suture materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Capsular contracture leads to undesirable outcomes when using breast prostheses. While implant characteristics and surgical techniques have been studied extensively, the impact of suture materials on capsule formation remains unclear.

Objectives: To evaluate the effects of different suture materials on capsular contracture development in a rat model with silicone implants.

Methods: The rats were divided into five groups. Silicone measuring 1.0x1.0x0.5 cm was implanted in the thoracodorsal region. The incisions were closed using poly(glycolide-co-lactide), polypropylene, polydioxanone, glycomer 631, and polyglycolide-co-caprolactone in Groups 1 to 5, respectively. The capsule surrounding the implant was examined in histopathological specimens collected during the 12th week after implantation.

Results: Capsule thickness varied significantly among groups, with Group 1 exhibiting the highest mean thickness and Group 4 the lowest. Inflammation levels also differed, with Group 3 showing the highest proportion of moderate to severe inflammation, whereas Group 4 primarily exhibited mild inflammation. The type of inflammation varied, with Groups 3, 4, and 5 predominantly showing mixed-type inflammation. The presence of foreign body giant cells was highest in Groups 1 and 2, while Group 4 had the lowest. No significant differences were observed in hemosiderin presence, collagen organization, or myofibroblast density.

Conclusions: In terms of the type and degree of inflammation, presence of foreign body giant cells, and average capsule thickness, Group 4 (glycomer 631) suture had the best overall performance, and Group 1 (poly(glycolide-co-lactide) performed the worst. Glycomer 631 sutures may reduce capsular contracture in silicone implant surgeries compared to other suture materials.

缝合材料对硅胶植入物囊挛缩发展的影响。
背景:乳房假体使用时,乳房包膜挛缩会导致不良后果。虽然种植体的特性和手术技术已被广泛研究,但缝合材料对囊形成的影响仍不清楚。目的:探讨不同缝合材料对硅胶植入大鼠关节囊挛缩的影响。方法:将大鼠分为5组。在胸背区植入尺寸为1.0 × 1.0 × 0.5 cm的硅胶。第1 ~ 5组分别用聚乙二醇-共丙交酯、聚丙烯、聚二恶酮、糖聚物631、聚乙二醇-共己内酯缝合切口。植入后第12周采集组织病理学标本,对种植体周围的包膜进行检查。结果:各组间胶囊厚度差异显著,1组平均厚度最大,4组平均厚度最小。炎症水平也有所不同,第3组出现中度至重度炎症的比例最高,而第4组主要表现为轻度炎症。炎症类型不同,3、4、5组以混合型炎症为主。第1、2组异物巨细胞最多,第4组最少。在含铁血黄素的存在、胶原组织或肌成纤维细胞密度方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:在炎症类型、炎症程度、异物巨细胞的存在、平均囊膜厚度方面,4组(糖蛋白631)缝线的综合性能最好,1组(聚乙二醇-聚乳酸)缝线的综合性能最差。与其他缝线材料相比,Glycomer 631缝线可以减少硅胶植入手术中囊膜挛缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信